30.06.2014 Views

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Catch (t)<br />

<strong>Total</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>extractions</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: 1950-present, Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Booth and Zeller 241<br />

due to seal damage.<br />

The estimated recreational catches of eel were larger than both unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs and discards<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed, and made up a substantial part of IUU catches (Figure 8b). The largest recreational catches<br />

were taken dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1970s with average catches of 460 t∙year -1 (55% of ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

1970s). Between 2000 and 2006, before <strong>the</strong> regulation of eel fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2007, <strong>the</strong> recreational catch was on<br />

average 210 t∙year -1 , equal<strong>in</strong>g approximately 70% of reported ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs for 2000-2006 (Figure 8b).<br />

The total reconstructed catch of eel was 50% larger than ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics from 1950-2007 (Figure<br />

8b). For <strong>the</strong> most recent years, <strong>the</strong> total reconstructed catches were on average twice as high as ICES<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics.<br />

Whitefish<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics for whitefish (whitefish and ‗whitefishes nei‘ comb<strong>in</strong>ed) didn‘t report any land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1950s and 1960s. After <strong>the</strong> mid 1970s, <strong>the</strong>y ranged between on average 300 – 400 t∙year -1 until<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2000s, when <strong>the</strong>y decl<strong>in</strong>ed and were around 200 t∙year -1 (Figure 9a).<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics were adjusted with Swedish national land<strong>in</strong>gs data from 1950-1969 to account for<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g data (Figure 9a). This adjustment added an additional 95% to reported data (Figure 9a; Appendix<br />

Table A9). Therefore, ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs + adjustments for whitefish decl<strong>in</strong>ed from a high <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1950s of<br />

around 860 t <strong>in</strong> 1951 to around 200 t∙year -1 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2000s (Figure 9a; Appendix Table A9).<br />

Estimated unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs were relatively low<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> whole time period and never exceeded 70<br />

t∙year -1 (Figure 9b). Prior to 1980, <strong>the</strong> estimated<br />

discards were relatively low and ranged between 20<br />

and 70 t∙year-1. After <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> seal<br />

population from <strong>the</strong> 1980s onwards, discards<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased considerably. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s <strong>the</strong><br />

estimated discards ranged between 130 and 260<br />

t∙year -1 , but decl<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2000s with an<br />

average discard of 90 t∙year -1 (Figure 9b).<br />

The estimated recreational whitefish catches were<br />

very large compared to reported land<strong>in</strong>gs, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about 4.5 times larger than reported land<strong>in</strong>gs from<br />

1950-2007. Recreational catches <strong>in</strong>creased from an<br />

estimated 300 t <strong>in</strong> 1950 to a peak of 1,600 t <strong>in</strong> 1975<br />

(Figure 9b). Thereafter, <strong>the</strong> recreational catches<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed from an average of 1,500 t∙year -1 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

1970s to annual catches of around 1,000 t∙year -1<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s. The recreational catches decl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

even more dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2000s to about 500 t∙year -1 .<br />

The total reconstructed whitefish catches were 7<br />

times larger than ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics from 1950-<br />

2007 (Figure 9b). For <strong>the</strong> most recent years, total<br />

reconstructed catches of whitefish were, on average,<br />

3.5 times larger than ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics (Figure<br />

9b).<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2,5001950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

b)<br />

Recreational<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

a)<br />

Adjustments<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

statistics<br />

+ adjustments<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics<br />

Discards<br />

Unreported<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

Year<br />

Figure 9. Swedish whitefish land<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> 1950-<br />

2007: a) ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics and adjustments; d) Sweden‘s<br />

reconstructed whitefish catches <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>.<br />

<strong>Total</strong> reconstructed catches<br />

Overall for Sweden, reported ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics were about 61,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1950s,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased to about 66,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1960s, and to 78,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1970s. ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

statistics <strong>the</strong>reafter <strong>in</strong>creased substantially to 125,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1980s, and to 216,000 t∙year -1<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s (Figure 10a). For <strong>the</strong> last eight years <strong>the</strong>y decl<strong>in</strong>ed and were on average 165,000 t∙year -1<br />

(Figure 10a).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!