30.06.2014 Views

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Catch (t x 10³)<br />

Thousands<br />

Thousands<br />

236 <strong>Total</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>extractions</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: 1950-present, Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Booth and Zeller<br />

for each year was applied to <strong>the</strong> total population number to derive a complete time series of number of<br />

recreational fishers. For example, <strong>the</strong> number of fishers <strong>in</strong> 1975 was 2 million, and given a total Swedish<br />

population of 8.2 million, <strong>the</strong> percentage of recreational fishers was 24.4%.<br />

The above recreational surveys were used to derive effort estimates (number of fish<strong>in</strong>g days per fisher per<br />

year), and a recreational catch rate per fisher per day. The number of recreational fish<strong>in</strong>g days <strong>in</strong> 1975 was<br />

25 million, which implies that <strong>the</strong> average number of fish<strong>in</strong>g days per fisher <strong>in</strong> 1975 was 12.5. The<br />

recreational catch <strong>in</strong> 1975 was 13,334 t, which gives a catch rate of 0.00053 t∙fisher -1 ∙day -1 . The 1975<br />

number of fish<strong>in</strong>g days and catch rate per fisher were carried back fixed to 1950. Thus, <strong>the</strong> recreational<br />

catch per year from 1950-2007 was estimated as <strong>the</strong> product of estimated number of recreational fishers,<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir average fish<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>in</strong> days, and daily catch rate. The species specific catch for each study was used<br />

to derive a fraction of total recreational catch per species where it was possible. These fractions were <strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolated and applied to <strong>the</strong> calculated total recreational catch.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The present results represent a first attempt at assumption-based reconstruction of total catch time series<br />

for Swedish <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>, from 1950-2007. Presented are data <strong>by</strong> species for <strong>the</strong> major<br />

species, followed <strong>by</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ation of recreational catch estimates, and total estimates for Sweden. When<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g total reconstructed catch <strong>in</strong> comparison to official reported land<strong>in</strong>gs of species, <strong>the</strong><br />

reconstructed catch has been compared to <strong>the</strong> official land<strong>in</strong>gs data as def<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> present purposes,<br />

namely ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics. For time series data of each category <strong>by</strong> species, see Appendix Tables A1-<br />

A9. For results presented <strong>by</strong> IUU components (ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>by</strong> species) see Appendix B.<br />

Cod<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics for Swedish cod land<strong>in</strong>gs decreased from approx. 22,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1950s<br />

to around 17,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1970s, and <strong>the</strong>reafter <strong>in</strong>creased substantially to about 51,000 t∙year -1<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1980s with <strong>the</strong> all time high reported land<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>by</strong> ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics <strong>in</strong> 1984 of almost<br />

66,000 t (Figure 2a). ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics for cod decl<strong>in</strong>ed rapidly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last<br />

five years averaged about 13,000 t∙year -1 (Figure 2a, Appendix Table A2).<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics were adjusted <strong>by</strong> around 3%,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly us<strong>in</strong>g adjustments from 1965-1975 from ICES<br />

stock assessment work<strong>in</strong>g group report data (Figure 2a).<br />

The adjustments resulted <strong>in</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g reported land<strong>in</strong>gs to<br />

around 23,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1960s and around<br />

18,000 t∙year -1 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1970s (Figure 2a, Appendix<br />

Table A2).<br />

Prior to <strong>the</strong> 1980s, unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs of cod were<br />

estimated to be relatively small, averag<strong>in</strong>g around 2,000<br />

t∙year -1 (Figure 2b). From 1980 until <strong>the</strong> 2000s,<br />

estimated unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs of between 3,000 and<br />

17,400 t∙year -1 made up a large proportion of<br />

unaccounted catches (Figure 2b). In more recent years,<br />

unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs of cod for Sweden have decl<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

around 1,900 t∙year -1 (Figure 2b; Appendix Table A2).<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1950s to 1970s, discards ranged between<br />

1,900 and 3,400 t∙year -1 (Figure 2b). Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1980s<br />

discards <strong>in</strong>creased to an average of around 7,100 t∙year -1 ,<br />

however, discard<strong>in</strong>g behavior rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to land<strong>in</strong>gs from 1950-1996 due to<br />

conservatively assumed fixed discard rate and <strong>the</strong>reafter<br />

varied year to year. In <strong>the</strong> last five years, <strong>the</strong> discards<br />

were <strong>the</strong> largest component of <strong>the</strong> unaccounted catches,<br />

with average discards of 2,500 t∙year -1 (Figure 2b).<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

a)<br />

Adjustments<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics<br />

100<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

b)<br />

90<br />

Recreational<br />

80<br />

70<br />

Discards<br />

60<br />

50<br />

Unreported<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics + adjustments<br />

0<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

Year<br />

Figure 2. Swedish cod land<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: a) ICES<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics and adjustments; b) Sweden‘s<br />

reconstructed cod catches <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!