30.06.2014 Views

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Catch ( t x 10 5 )<br />

<strong>Total</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>extractions</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: 1950-present, Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Booth and Zeller 19<br />

cod, and negative adjustments rang<strong>in</strong>g from – 88,096 t to -183 t were<br />

added to our rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g taxa (Table 11).<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> entire period of study (1950-2007), adjustments added to<br />

reported land<strong>in</strong>gs for Latvia, Russia and Estonia comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

represented 80% of <strong>the</strong> adjustments made for all countries (Table 12).<br />

The majority of <strong>the</strong>se adjustments were added to <strong>the</strong>se countries prior<br />

to 1990 (see <strong>country</strong> specific reports) and illustrates our preference for<br />

adjustments to reflect purely <strong>country</strong> specific catch account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

preferences. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g countries‘ adjustments contributed <strong>the</strong><br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 15% of <strong>the</strong> total adjustments made to all countries (Table<br />

12). F<strong>in</strong>land, Sweden and Denmark all had net negative adjustments<br />

added to ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics between 1950 and 2007 (Table 12).<br />

Overall, Denmark received <strong>the</strong> smallest magnitude of adjustments to<br />

reported land<strong>in</strong>gs (Table 12).<br />

Unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Table 12. Adjustments (t) to<br />

reported land<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

proportion (%) of <strong>the</strong> overall total<br />

<strong>Baltic</strong>-wide adjustments to land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

reported <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

statistics, <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong>, for <strong>the</strong> period<br />

from 1950 to 2007.<br />

Country Adjustments (t) (%)<br />

Latvia 3,062,556 31.2<br />

Russia 2,660,518 27.1<br />

Estonia 2,585,171 26.3<br />

Lithuania 895,941 9.1<br />

Germany 628,609 6.4<br />

Poland 328,085 3.3<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land -180,437 -1.8<br />

Sweden -143,739 -1.5<br />

Denmark -8,493 -0.1<br />

Unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs totaled approximately 5.7 million t between 1950 and 2007 for all taxa and all<br />

countries fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> LME (Figure 3). Estimated unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>creased slowly from<br />

approximately 9,000 t∙year -1 <strong>in</strong> 1950, to<br />

approximately 50,000 t∙year -1 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late<br />

1970s. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1980s <strong>the</strong>y <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

to approximately 110,000 t∙year -1 , before<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g to approximately 350,000<br />

t∙year -1 <strong>in</strong> 1996-1997. Unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs apparently decl<strong>in</strong>ed steadily<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>n, reach<strong>in</strong>g approximately<br />

155,000 t∙year -1 <strong>in</strong> 2007 (Figure 3).<br />

Cod had <strong>the</strong> greatest amount of<br />

unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs, total<strong>in</strong>g about 2.3<br />

million t over <strong>the</strong> period of study (1950-<br />

2007; Table 13). By <strong>the</strong> 2000s (2000-<br />

2007) unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs of cod<br />

averaged 66,000 t∙year -1 (Figure 3). The<br />

total unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of cod (1950-2007) were<br />

about 18% greater than<br />

those of herr<strong>in</strong>g, which<br />

had <strong>the</strong> second greatest<br />

volume of unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs (Table 13). By <strong>the</strong><br />

2000s unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs of herr<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

sprat were on average<br />

62,000 t∙year -1 and 52,000<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Flatfish<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

Year<br />

Figure 3. <strong>Total</strong> unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs for cod, herr<strong>in</strong>g, sprat,<br />

flatfishes and ‗o<strong>the</strong>rs‘ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> Large Mar<strong>in</strong>e Ecosystem<br />

for <strong>the</strong> period 1950-2007.<br />

Table 13. <strong>Total</strong> estimated unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs (t) <strong>by</strong> major taxa for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong><br />

Large Mar<strong>in</strong>e Ecosystem for <strong>the</strong> period from 1950-2007.<br />

Common<br />

name<br />

1950-<br />

1959<br />

1960-<br />

1969<br />

1970-<br />

1979<br />

1980-<br />

1989<br />

1990-<br />

1999<br />

2000-<br />

2007<br />

Cod 47,187 98,764 200,939 593,744 844,289 525,182<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g 54,547 92,751 166,211 292,845 860,401 495,525<br />

Sprat 3,225 5,768 13,722 17,051 669,814 416,659<br />

Flatfishes 4,481 8,399 8,621 9,390 35,463 24,016<br />

Salmon 1,238 2,233 2,555 2,365 3,885 1,679<br />

'O<strong>the</strong>rs' 17,016 21,188 25,507 29,150 93,411 51,267<br />

t∙year -1 , respectively.<br />

Unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs of all species peaked <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s, with those of cod and herr<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most<br />

signficiant (Table 13). The only species whose estimates of unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs rema<strong>in</strong>ed quite stable<br />

between 1950 and 2007 were those of salmon (Table 13).<br />

For <strong>the</strong> entire period, unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs were greatest <strong>in</strong> Poland, Denmark, and Sweden (Table 14). For<br />

<strong>country</strong>-specific data, see <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>country</strong> reports (this volume). Each of <strong>the</strong>se countries had unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs that totaled more than 1 million t over <strong>the</strong> period of study (Table 14), with Poland hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

greatest amount of unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs total<strong>in</strong>g approximately 1.7 million t, or 29% of <strong>the</strong> total<br />

unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs of all <strong>Baltic</strong> countries between 1950 and 2007. The total unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land were representative of <strong>the</strong> mean proportion of unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>Baltic</strong>-wide, with<br />

Sprat<br />

Cod

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!