30.06.2014 Views

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Catch ( t x 10 5 )<br />

132 <strong>Total</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>extractions</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: 1950-present, Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Booth and Zeller<br />

Three ports have offered boat charters to catch cod recreationally<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004. In one harbor, Liepaja, 15 boats were estimated to catch<br />

between 3-5 tonnes <strong>in</strong> 2007 (M. Plikshs, unpubl. data). Assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> same catch rates for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two harbors, we estimated <strong>the</strong><br />

recreational catch of cod to be 12 tonnes per year s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004.<br />

LATFRA reported that Latvian recreational fishers also caught<br />

herr<strong>in</strong>g, salmon, flounder, garfish, seatrout, perch and smelt. We<br />

relied on recreational catch <strong>in</strong>formation from Estonia to estimate<br />

<strong>the</strong>se catches from 2004-2007. To rema<strong>in</strong> conservative, we used half<br />

of <strong>the</strong> average reported recreational catch rates from Estonia. These<br />

were transformed <strong>in</strong>to per capita catch rates for <strong>the</strong> coastal<br />

population (see Methods <strong>in</strong> Veitch et al., this volume). We estimated<br />

<strong>the</strong> coastal population for Latvia as <strong>the</strong> total population of coastal<br />

districts to be approximately 1,676,000 <strong>in</strong>habitants (Anon., 2006c).<br />

Multiply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> estimated coastal population of Latvia with <strong>the</strong> per<br />

capita catch rates, we estimated Latvia‘s recreational catches for <strong>the</strong><br />

Table 5. Anchor po<strong>in</strong>ts for Latvia‘s<br />

recreational catch for <strong>the</strong> period<br />

2004-2007, based on half <strong>the</strong> average<br />

Estonian reported recreational catch<br />

for 2004 and 2007 (Anon., 2006b;<br />

2007). See Veitch et al. (this volume).<br />

Common Recreational catch 2004-<br />

Name 2007 t·year -1<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g 1.24<br />

Salmon 2.04<br />

Flounder 50.67<br />

Garfish 30.73<br />

<strong>Sea</strong> trout 1.65<br />

Perch 2.17<br />

Smelt 35.48<br />

above species from 2004-2007 (Table 5). For all species, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cod, we assumed a recreational catch of<br />

zero <strong>in</strong> 1990. L<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong>terpolations for all Latvian recreational catches were performed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g<br />

years from 1991-2003.<br />

RESULTS<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics for Latvia have only been <strong>in</strong>corporated<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce 1991, prior to that <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> land<strong>in</strong>g<br />

statistics of <strong>the</strong> USSR (Table 6). In 1991, <strong>the</strong> ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

statistics reported land<strong>in</strong>gs of 55,461 t, which decreased<br />

slightly for <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g two years, but <strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong>creased to reach<br />

86,123 t <strong>in</strong> 1997. From 1998-2007, <strong>the</strong> average annual ICES<br />

land<strong>in</strong>g statistics were 81,144 t, with a peak of 93,088 t <strong>in</strong><br />

2005. The time series ended with land<strong>in</strong>gs of 89,366 t <strong>in</strong> 2007.<br />

From 1991-2007, ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics report a total catch of<br />

1,211,724 t for Latvia (Figure 2).<br />

Table 6. ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics presented as<br />

totals for Latvia (t) from 1992-2007, prior to<br />

which catches are not reported <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

(see text for details).<br />

Common<br />

name<br />

1950-<br />

1989<br />

1990-<br />

1999<br />

2000-<br />

2007<br />

Cod n/a 43,680 39,937<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g n/a 237,265 192,818<br />

Sprat n/a 263,669 410,376<br />

Salmon n/a 1,882 531<br />

Flatfishes n/a 4,004 7,065<br />

‘O<strong>the</strong>rs’ n/a 6,044 4,453<br />

Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) catches<br />

IUU is used <strong>in</strong> this report to quantify any<br />

catches made <strong>by</strong> a <strong>country</strong> that are not<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics.<br />

Adjustments to ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics,<br />

unreported (‗unallocated‘) land<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

discards, and recreational catches account<br />

for our IUU adjustments (see Methods for<br />

details and sources).<br />

Adjustments to ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong>re were a total of 3,063,556 t of<br />

adjustments to ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics<br />

from 1950-2007 (Table 7). The majority of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se adjustments were due to <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

prior to 1991, Latvian land<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

Adjustments<br />

0.0<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

Year<br />

Figure 2. ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics and adjustments to ICES<br />

land<strong>in</strong>g statistics for Latvia from 1950-2007<br />

reported as part of <strong>the</strong> former USSR, and <strong>the</strong>re has been no retroactive adjustment to ICES land<strong>in</strong>g<br />

statistics (Figure 2). For <strong>the</strong> time period from 1950-1990, a total 3,062,720 t of adjustments were made.<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g and cod adjustments had <strong>the</strong> largest proportions of adjustments, account<strong>in</strong>g for 43% (1,317,909 t)<br />

and 28% (863,759 t), respectively. Sprat and <strong>the</strong> group ‗o<strong>the</strong>rs‘ accounted for 16% (496,191 t) and 11%<br />

ICES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!