30.06.2014 Views

2025 Design & Master Plan - South Dakota State University

2025 Design & Master Plan - South Dakota State University

2025 Design & Master Plan - South Dakota State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2 sustainability<br />

All new campus facilities are required to be designed to achieve a minimum<br />

of LEED Silver Certification. Building construction alternatives should be<br />

evaluated that explore sustainable performance beyond this requirement.<br />

The university intends to develop buildings that require less maintenance<br />

and operational investment over time while continuing to meet the needs<br />

of users and enhance the campus aesthetic. This can be accomplished by<br />

extending the renewal cycles for building materials, by increasing building<br />

energy efficiency, and by reducing water consumption of the building users.<br />

These design guidelines support the achievement of fiscally sound and<br />

environmentally responsible development and the wise stewardship of all<br />

campus resources. Examples of the type of activities are:<br />

Building design should maximize flexibility to satisfy the varied demands<br />

of the present and future. The guiding standard should be that the building<br />

envelope be designed for 50 years of service, with a 15- to 20-year building<br />

interior life. A building should be able to accommodate some level of<br />

adaptation and reconfiguration without exorbitant expense or structural<br />

modification.<br />

New architecture should incorporate the latest in proven sustainable building<br />

technologies. When possible, building placement should capitalize on solar<br />

heat gain/loss in the appropriate months and maximize the introduction of<br />

natural light and natural ventilation through the use of operable windows.<br />

1) When possible, design facilities and building systems to save nonrenewable<br />

resources through the use of substitutes, recycling, and<br />

better recovery and reuse.<br />

2) Include consideration for maintainability over time through potential<br />

benefits from building lifecycle cost analyses, alternative<br />

performance systems, and other strategies at time of design and<br />

construction.<br />

3) Promote ongoing energy conservation practices, water conservation<br />

and waste reduction.<br />

4) Address alternative transportation opportunities by developing a<br />

campus environment that encourages walking, bicycling and<br />

future transit expansion.<br />

Campus buildings are designed for a 50-year life. Lifetime operating costs<br />

of these buildings will most likely exceed the original cost of construction.<br />

Reduction of these long-term operating costs needs to be considered when<br />

planning for new facilities. Building designs should be durable and readily<br />

maintainable, and should be flexible in design in order to accommodate<br />

repurposing of spaces to meet changing programmatic needs. This may<br />

translate into higher initial construction costs, but will ultimately reduce<br />

lifetime operating costs.<br />

jackrabbit village<br />

b:5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!