29.06.2014 Views

Introducing behaviour changes towards sustainable food consumption

Introducing behaviour changes towards sustainable food consumption

Introducing behaviour changes towards sustainable food consumption

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCING BEHAVIOUR CHANGES<br />

Defra´s research indicates that adopting a low-impact diet is unpopular with most people, and that<br />

reducing dairy <strong>consumption</strong> is even less popular than eating less meat; there are strong habits, values<br />

and social norms around consuming animal products. It is easier to change people’s purchasing<br />

habits than their diets; reducing <strong>food</strong> waste and buying more seasonal and local <strong>food</strong> is generally a<br />

more acceptable goal than eating a low-impact diet. People are eating out more; interventions need<br />

to address <strong>sustainable</strong> eating at restaurants as well as in the home.<br />

How can <strong>behaviour</strong> be changed?<br />

Consumers need more than information in order to change their <strong>behaviour</strong> – <strong>sustainable</strong> choices can<br />

be promoted through infrastructure and pricing policies, as well as promoting social norms that make<br />

<strong>sustainable</strong> choices normal and desirable for mainstream society.<br />

Studying past successes in promoting <strong>sustainable</strong> <strong>behaviour</strong> (e.g. NCC and SDC 2006) shows that<br />

green consumers on their own are rarely able to change mainstream product markets – choice editing<br />

by regulators, retailers and manufacturers has driven the change in most cases.<br />

Make it realistic for people to change:<br />

• Remove barriers to <strong>sustainable</strong> <strong>behaviour</strong>: governments (and businesses) can ensure that prices<br />

are affordable, products are easily available, and that information is simple and clear.<br />

• Use choice-editing: the process of removing the least <strong>sustainable</strong> products from the market place,<br />

so that consumers are left to choose from a range of more <strong>sustainable</strong> products. For example,<br />

governments can ban damaging products or ingredients (e.g. inefficient light bulbs), or enforce<br />

minimum standards for products (e.g. efficiency standards for washing machines); businesses can<br />

choose to not stock the least <strong>sustainable</strong> products (e.g. fish that are listed as endangered species).<br />

This approach ensures that the responsibility for achieving <strong>sustainable</strong> <strong>consumption</strong> is not<br />

entirely borne by consumers.<br />

Target groups / communities rather than individuals:<br />

• People act, learn and change as part of their social groups rather than as individuals: changing<br />

what is socially acceptable (e.g. by targeting workplaces, schools, etc) makes it easier for people<br />

to adopt new <strong>behaviour</strong>s.<br />

• When acting as part of a group, people are reassured that their actions will make a difference.<br />

• Community-based social marketing can be effective at changing <strong>behaviour</strong>, through removing<br />

barriers to change (practical and social) and highlighting the benefits.<br />

Target more effectively:<br />

• Different people respond to different messengers, so a range of messengers is required e.g.<br />

governments, businesses, charities, media.<br />

• Using consumer segmentation models (see e.g. Defra 2008) may help with selecting appropriate<br />

interventions for various target audiences.<br />

• Clarify confusing issues, such as the over-focus on “<strong>food</strong> miles” (the impact of production, storage<br />

or domestic transport may be more significant, depending on the product).<br />

Page 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!