SCMTD February 2004 Board of Directors Agendas - Santa Cruz ...
SCMTD February 2004 Board of Directors Agendas - Santa Cruz ... SCMTD February 2004 Board of Directors Agendas - Santa Cruz ...
UCSC Faculty / Staff Billable Trips 160,000 140,000 120,000 Year to date billable trips increased by 22.7% # of Billable Trips 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 Year
SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT DATE: February 27, 2004 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Board of Directors Tom Stickel, Manager of Fleet Maintenance CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO BROWN, ARMSTRONG, PAULDEN, MCCOWN, STARBUCK, & KEETER ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION FOR FINANCIAL AUDIT AND TAX SERVICES I. RECOMMENDED ACTION District staff is recommending that the Board of Directors authorize the General Manager to execute a contract with Brown, Armstrong, Paulden, McCown, Starbuck & Keeter Accountancy Corporation for financial audit and tax services for a total amount not to exceed $ 37,700. II. SUMMARY OF ISSUES • A competitive procurement was conducted to solicit proposals from qualified firms. • Four firms submitted proposals for the District’s review. • A three-member evaluation committee comprised of District staff reviewed and evaluated the proposals. • The evaluation committee is recommending that a contract be established with Brown, Armstrong, Paulden, McCown, Starbuck & Keeter Accountancy Corporation to provide financial audit and tax services for a total not to exceed amount of $37,700. III. DISCUSSION On December 19, 2003, District Request for Proposal, 03-11 was mailed to several accounting and tax services firms and was legally advertised. On January 16, 2004, proposals were received and opened from four firms. A three-member evaluation committee comprised of: Betsy Ross, Manager of Finance; Marilyn Fenn, Assistant Manger of Finance; and Lloyd Longnecker, District Buyer have reviewed and evaluated the proposals. A list and ranking of these firms are provided in Attachment A. The evaluation committee used the following criteria as contained in the Request for Proposals:
- Page 42 and 43: i .:,; !;f: ,‘I>* 1 :; ; 1; ‘
- Page 44 and 45: _ ..y; 7 : i, . _ /’ : 5 I :js ,
- Page 46 and 47: ,- ‘ ,I I ;. _ ! !i + ” i ;z;:L
- Page 48 and 49: Page 1 of the Ridership Report will
- Page 50 and 51: Service Interruption Summary Report
- Page 52 and 53: GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM RECOMMENDED A
- Page 54 and 55: Metro Accessible Services Transit F
- Page 56 and 57: Note: This meeting is held at a loc
- Page 58 and 59: MASTF Minutes January 15, 2004 Page
- Page 60 and 61: those unable to attend the meeting.
- Page 62 and 63: ecommendations as well as discussio
- Page 64 and 65: Discussion of the reports from Mr.
- Page 66 and 67: 4) Mr. LeBlanc suggested that “Ju
- Page 68 and 69: Discussion of this proposal conclud
- Page 70 and 71: Ms. Barbour noted: MASTF Goals for
- Page 72 and 73: SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DIS
- Page 74 and 75: MONTHLY REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT
- Page 76 and 77: CONSOLIDATED OPERATING EXPENSE DECE
- Page 78 and 79: MONTHLY REVENUE AND EXPENSE REPORT
- Page 80 and 81: 13. Employee incentive program expe
- Page 82 and 83: SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DIS
- Page 84 and 85: April May June 12000 10000 8000 600
- Page 86 and 87: METRO ParaCruz Eligibility Determin
- Page 88 and 89: HIGHWAY 17 - DECEMBER 2003 December
- Page 90 and 91: Board of Directors Page 2 • Stude
- Page 94 and 95: Board of Directors Board Meeting of
- Page 96 and 97: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR
- Page 98 and 99: 5. COMPENSATION 5.01 Terms of Payme
- Page 100 and 101: SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DIS
- Page 102 and 103: proposals, unless a longer time per
- Page 104 and 105: PART II GENERAL INFORMATION FORM (T
- Page 106 and 107: BUY AMERICA PROVISION (Only for Con
- Page 108 and 109: CONTRACTOR DBE INFORMATION CONTRACT
- Page 110 and 111: All accounting records are computer
- Page 112 and 113: Mail or deliver to: Santa Cruz Metr
- Page 114 and 115: PART IV GENERAL CONDITIONS TO THE C
- Page 116 and 117: Contractor is not entitled to damag
- Page 118 and 119: 9. NO DISCRIMINATION In connection
- Page 120 and 121: 13.10.04 Contractor shall be solely
- Page 122 and 123: PART V PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRA
- Page 124 and 125: District shall compensate Contracto
- Page 126 and 127: PART VI FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRAT
- Page 128 and 129: Contractor shall recognize mandator
- Page 130 and 131: 12.1 Policy It is the policy of the
- Page 132 and 133: (b) "Records" means any item, colle
- Page 134 and 135: (iii) a change in the officer(s), e
- Page 136 and 137: An Offeror may seek FTA review of t
- Page 138 and 139: . SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT D
- Page 140 and 141: Peter C. Brown, CPA Burton H. Armst
SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT<br />
DATE: <strong>February</strong> 27, <strong>2004</strong><br />
TO:<br />
FROM:<br />
SUBJECT:<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong><br />
Tom Stickel, Manager <strong>of</strong> Fleet Maintenance<br />
CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO BROWN,<br />
ARMSTRONG, PAULDEN, MCCOWN, STARBUCK, & KEETER<br />
ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION FOR FINANCIAL AUDIT AND TAX<br />
SERVICES<br />
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION<br />
District staff is recommending that the <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> authorize the General Manager<br />
to execute a contract with Brown, Armstrong, Paulden, McCown, Starbuck & Keeter<br />
Accountancy Corporation for financial audit and tax services for a total amount not to<br />
exceed $ 37,700.<br />
II.<br />
SUMMARY OF ISSUES<br />
• A competitive procurement was conducted to solicit proposals from qualified firms.<br />
• Four firms submitted proposals for the District’s review.<br />
• A three-member evaluation committee comprised <strong>of</strong> District staff reviewed and<br />
evaluated the proposals.<br />
• The evaluation committee is recommending that a contract be established with<br />
Brown, Armstrong, Paulden, McCown, Starbuck & Keeter Accountancy Corporation<br />
to provide financial audit and tax services for a total not to exceed amount <strong>of</strong><br />
$37,700.<br />
III.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
On December 19, 2003, District Request for Proposal, 03-11 was mailed to several accounting<br />
and tax services firms and was legally advertised. On January 16, <strong>2004</strong>, proposals were received<br />
and opened from four firms. A three-member evaluation committee comprised <strong>of</strong>: Betsy Ross,<br />
Manager <strong>of</strong> Finance; Marilyn Fenn, Assistant Manger <strong>of</strong> Finance; and Lloyd Longnecker,<br />
District Buyer have reviewed and evaluated the proposals. A list and ranking <strong>of</strong> these firms are<br />
provided in Attachment A.<br />
The evaluation committee used the following criteria as contained in the Request for Proposals: