28.06.2014 Views

Recent Trends in Nostratic Comparative Linguistics - The Georgian ...

Recent Trends in Nostratic Comparative Linguistics - The Georgian ...

Recent Trends in Nostratic Comparative Linguistics - The Georgian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Recent</strong> <strong>Trends</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nostratic</strong> <strong>Comparative</strong> L<strong>in</strong>guistics 155<br />

Plural/collective: *-la<br />

Plural: *-nV<br />

Note: plurality could also be expressed by reduplication of the root.<br />

7.3. Derivational Suffixes<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-ri/*-re<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-ma<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-ya<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-t h a<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-na<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-la<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-k h a<br />

Nom<strong>in</strong>alizer: *-k’a<br />

8.0. Verbal Morphology<br />

In Proto-<strong>Nostratic</strong>, verbs fell <strong>in</strong>to two types of construction: (1) active and (2) stative. In active constructions,<br />

which usually <strong>in</strong>volved transitive verbs, the grammatical subject of the verb represented the agent perform<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

action, and the direct object represented the patient, or recipient, of the action. Stative constructions, on the other<br />

hand, expressed a state of affairs, rather than an event. Verbs expressed aspectual contrasts rather than temporal<br />

contrasts. Tense relates the time of the situation referred to to some other time, usually to the moment of speak<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

while aspect marks the duration or type of temporal activity denoted by the verb. Proto-<strong>Nostratic</strong> had two aspects: (A)<br />

perfective (past) and (B) imperfective (non-past). Proto-<strong>Nostratic</strong> also had, at the very least, the follow<strong>in</strong>g moods:<br />

(A) <strong>in</strong>dicative; (B) imperative; (C) conditional; (D) hortatory-precative; (E) <strong>in</strong>choative; and (F) prohibitive. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

was also a causative construction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> overall structure of verbs was as follows:<br />

Root + formative vowel (+ derivational suffix)<br />

(+ mood marker) (+ person marker) (+ number marker)<br />

A stem could consist of the unextended root or the root extended by a s<strong>in</strong>gle derivational suffix (preceded, as<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated above, by a formative vowel). <strong>The</strong> position of the number marker seems to have been flexible – it could also<br />

be placed before the person marker. Gender was not marked. <strong>The</strong>re were no prefixes <strong>in</strong> Proto-<strong>Nostratic</strong>. We may note<br />

here that Krishnamurti (2003:279 and 312) posits the follow<strong>in</strong>g structure for verbs <strong>in</strong> Proto-Dravidian:<br />

Stem + tense-mood + (gender-)number-person marker<br />

Stative verbs were <strong>in</strong>different to number and, therefore, had no plural forms. <strong>The</strong>y also had a special set of<br />

person markers different from those of active verbs:<br />

Active person markers<br />

Stative person markers<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gular Plural<br />

1p. *mi *ma (<strong>in</strong>clusive) (+ plural marker) *k h a<br />

*na *na (exclusive) (+ plural marker) *Ha<br />

2p. *t h i *t h i (+ plural marker) *t h i<br />

*si<br />

*ni<br />

3p. *ša-/*šd- *ša-/*š@- (+ plural marker) *Ø<br />

*na-, *ni- *na-, *ni- (+ plural marker)<br />

Morphologically, verbs could be either f<strong>in</strong>ite or non-f<strong>in</strong>ite. F<strong>in</strong>ite forms could be marked for aspect, mood,<br />

person, and number, but not for gender or tense. Non-f<strong>in</strong>ite forms exhibited nom<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flection. In unmarked word<br />

order, the verb occupied the end position of a clause.<br />

Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!