28.06.2014 Views

Modern - Blog Science Connections

Modern - Blog Science Connections

Modern - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CNS prophylaxis on overall survival oron duration<br />

ofhaematological remission (Figs.1 ,2). The<br />

major problem in management, therefore, remains<br />

that of haematological relapse, although<br />

the proportion of deaths in remission also gives<br />

cause for continuing concern.<br />

A. Death in remission<br />

Analysis of data from the first and second<br />

UKALL trials showed that death in remission<br />

was primarily seen in patients with "standard"<br />

prognostic features (aged less than 14 at<br />

diagnosis with apre-treatment leucocyte count<br />

of less than 20X 10 9 /1) (Medical Research<br />

Council 1976). A survey of remission deaths in<br />

children at GOS between 1973 and 1977<br />

(Table 1) who all received standard CNS<br />

prophylaxis with cranial irradiation and intrathecal<br />

methotrexate showed that the most<br />

common cause was measles pneumonia, usually<br />

occurring in children without overt clinical<br />

measles. Two of the four deaths from septicaemia<br />

occurred in young infants and one in<br />

a splenectomized child receiving prophylactic<br />

penicillin. The high incidence of measles pneumonia<br />

can be ascribed to the regrettably low<br />

uptake of measles vaccine in Britain.<br />

Table 1. Causes of death in remission in 168 children<br />

with ALL<br />

Cause<br />

Measles 6<br />

Septicaemia 4<br />

Cytomegalovirus 2<br />

Herpes simplex 1<br />

Varicella-zoster 1<br />

Total<br />

No. patients<br />

14 (8% of cases)<br />

Concern about these complications of treatment<br />

led us to explore the relative efficacy and<br />

immunosuppression of 6-mercaptopurine and<br />

methotrexate given in equivalent dose either<br />

continously or intermittently in a 5-day course<br />

every three weeks (Fig. 3). The continuous (C)<br />

and intermittent (I) arms of this protocol for<br />

"standard risk" patients were introduced at<br />

GOS in 1974 and the protocol was subsequently<br />

adopted as the UKALL V schedule,<br />

with introduction of an intermediate (G)<br />

schedule. The results of the immunological<br />

studies in the three groups of patients have<br />

recently been published (Rapson et al. 1980)<br />

and show that in patients receiving continuous<br />

chemotherapy the blood lymphocyte counts,<br />

rJI.<br />

75<br />

~<br />

VI<br />

VI<br />

:E<br />

LLJ<br />

Q:: 50<br />

...J<br />

76-77<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!