28.06.2014 Views

Modern - Blog Science Connections

Modern - Blog Science Connections

Modern - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

seven are in second remission for 6 to 23 +<br />

months and two have been reinduced into new<br />

remissions after a second relapse off therapy.<br />

The durations of their third hematologie remissions<br />

are 7 + and 18 + months. Of the eight<br />

patients who had treatment stopped for a second<br />

time, one completed therapy only recently<br />

and six are in unmaintained second remissions<br />

for 12 + to 51 + months. Another child<br />

who also developed a second relapse off<br />

therapy attained a third remission and is now<br />

off treatment a third time for 6 + months.<br />

Among the 17 survivors, 14 have had<br />

long-term leukemia-free remissions. Their<br />

median survival since diagnosis is 9 years<br />

(range 5-14 years), with a median of 33 +<br />

months (range 19+ to 76+ mo) of continuous<br />

complete remission since their last relapse.<br />

F. Discussion<br />

These results demonstrate that prolonged second<br />

remissions are attainable in about onethird<br />

of the patients who develop a marrow<br />

relapse after elective cessation of initial cureoriented<br />

therapy. Most importantly, in a certain<br />

proportion of children therapy may be<br />

stopped altogether for a second time. Although<br />

it is still not possible to prediet the<br />

likelihood of relapse in individual patients<br />

after cessation ot treatment (Sirnone et al.<br />

1978), statistical analysis of patient variables<br />

at the time of relapse can provide a reliable<br />

estimate of prognosis. Patients whose first<br />

complete remission lasts Ion ger than 3 years,<br />

whose first relapse occurs more than 6 months<br />

after cessation of therapy, and whose si te of<br />

relapse is exclusively hematologic have a significantly<br />

better chance to attain a extended<br />

second remission.<br />

Other large series of patients are not available<br />

for comparison. Instances of extended<br />

se co nd remissions have been reported, but<br />

only in patients who relapsed after unmaintained<br />

remissions following short-term initial<br />

therapy, i.e., 3-13 months (Leventhal et al.<br />

1975).<br />

When first diagnosed with ALL, none of the<br />

children in these studies had clinical or biologie<br />

features that are today regarded as carrying<br />

a "high risk" for early treatment failure. The<br />

most plausible explanation for their variable<br />

therapeutic responsiveness is that subpopulations<br />

of leukemic cells not eradicated by initial<br />

treatment have different growth potentials,<br />

which would account for the wide range in<br />

duration of second remissions (3 to 78 +<br />

months). For the few patients who remain free<br />

of leukemia after completing a second course<br />

of therapy, one could speculate that there<br />

relapses stemmed from the emergence of<br />

a new (and hence more drug-sensitive) clone<br />

of leukemic cells. Evidence for the emergence<br />

of different clones of leukemic cells in previously<br />

treated patients is supported by several<br />

re cent reports (Fisher et al. 1977; Merteksmann<br />

et al. 1978; Spector et al. 1979).<br />

The treatment results presented here were<br />

obtained by administering a second program of<br />

thera y :omparable to that originally given to<br />

these children. The only notable exception was<br />

that CNS prophylaxis was not repeated in<br />

about one-half of the subjects, because at the<br />

onset of the study the need for such additional<br />

treatment was unknown. Repeating a treatment<br />

that has be co me ineffective would not be<br />

recommended today. It should be stressed,<br />

however, that even in this circumstance about<br />

onethird of our patients responded weIl to<br />

therapy, an outcome that compares favorably<br />

to results for initially treated childhood ALL.<br />

Ultimately, the prospects for obtaining larger<br />

proportions of long-term remissions following<br />

relapse will depend on the development of<br />

more effective chemotherapy, preferably with<br />

agents not used earlier, to suppress the emergen<br />

ce of drug-resistant disease. A new protocol<br />

study to test the value of cyclie combination<br />

chemotherapy for maintenance of second remissions<br />

is underway at this center.<br />

We conclude that children with ALL who<br />

develop marrow relapses during unmaintained<br />

remissions should be retreated just as aggressively<br />

as newly diagnosed patients.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

I thank J.R. Gilbert for criticisms and editorial<br />

suggestions throughout preparation of this paper.<br />

References<br />

Aur RJA, Simone JV, Verzosa MS, Hustu HO,<br />

Barker LS, Pinkel DP, Rivera G, Dahl GV, Wood A,<br />

Stagner S, Mason C (1978) Childhood acute lymphocytic<br />

leukemia. Study VIII. Cancer<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!