28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

590 Intensive use of Carmustine<br />

Pulmonary toxicity seems to be greater when carmustine is given in a brief,<br />

intensive schedule with bone marrow transplantation, compared with the<br />

same dose in a conventional schedule (2). Severe hepatotoxicity and<br />

neurotoxicity appeared at higher doses.<br />

During the phase I study and subsequent phase II trial, impressive<br />

antitumor responses occurred in several types of tumors, including melanoma,<br />

glioblastoma, small cell carcinoma of the lung, and metastatic tumors<br />

of the central nervous system.<br />

unfortunately, attempts to exploit this single-agent activity by combining<br />

carmustine with other agents have not been overly successful. For instance,<br />

Herzig (3) reported on the use of carmustine at doses of 600-1200 mg/m 2<br />

and melphalan at 90-180 mg/m 2<br />

in treating metastatic melanoma. The<br />

complete and overall response rates of 10% and 59%, respectively, were not<br />

superior to those observed with either single-agent carmustine (4) or<br />

melphalan (5). Moreover, pulmonary toxicity seemed to increase with the<br />

higher doses of this regimen. Peters etal. (6) experienced difficulty with their<br />

intensive combination-chemotherapy regimens that include carmustine at<br />

600-750 mg/m 2 . The subsequent deletion of carmustine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide<br />

plus melphalan, and carmustine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin<br />

plus etoposide produced altered, often diminished, patterns of renal and<br />

hepatic toxicity, respectively (Peters et ai, personal communication).<br />

We are currently attempting to give total carmustine doses of 1200-1800<br />

mg/m 2<br />

in two or three "fractionated" courses over several months. This will<br />

be successful only if damage is not invariably cumulative.<br />

In summary, carmustine monochemotherapy with ABMT is not likely to<br />

find a major place in antineoplastic therapy; the doses required to provide a<br />

measure of tumor control are probably too toxic. Although there are<br />

problems with the combinations noted above, carmustine probably is still<br />

useful, especially for treating tumors for which carmustine is active at a<br />

conventional dose. Examples include the malignant gliomas, Hodgkin's<br />

disease, and perhaps certain other tumors. In any case, it is unlikely that a<br />

carmustine dose of more than 600-750 mg/m 2<br />

can be given without<br />

incurring an at least 10% incidence of severe interstitial pneumonia.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Phillips GL, Fay JW, Herzig GP, Herzig RH, Weiner RS, Wolff SN, Lazarus HM, Karanes C,<br />

Ross WE, Kramer BS, The Southeastern Cancer Study Group. Cancer 1983;52:1792.<br />

2. Weinstein AS, Diener-West M, Nelson DF, Pakuris E. Cancer Treat Rep 1986;70:943.<br />

3. Herzig RH. In Management of Advanced Melanoma, NathansonL, ed. Churchill-Livingstone,<br />

New York, 1986:71.<br />

4. Fay JW, Levine MN, Phillips GL, Herzig GP, Herzig RH, Lazarus HM, Wolff SN, Weiner RS.<br />

Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research/American Society of Clinical<br />

Oncology 1981 ;17:532.<br />

5. Lazarus HM, Herzig RH, Graham-Pole J, Wolff SN, Phillips GL, Strandjord S, Hurd D,<br />

Forman W, Gordon EM, Coccia P, Gross S, Herzig GP. J Clin Oncol 1983;1:359.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!