28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Clinical Intensification Regimens forABMT 573<br />

appropriate to the transplant arena. We are now using this system to analyze a<br />

number of variables, particularly those relating to effect of tumor size on<br />

fractional kill, the effect of different drugs and different tumors, and the effect<br />

of schedule and combination therapy on cell kill.<br />

CROSS-RESISTANCE AMONG ALKYLATING AGENTS IN<br />

COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY<br />

Schabel and colleagues, some 7 years ago, demonstrated for LI 210<br />

mouse leukemia that induction of resistance to a given alkylating agent<br />

usually did not confer cross-resistance to the other alkylating agents (Table 1 )<br />

(2). This observation, which was counterdogma at the time, was of major<br />

significance, since it indicated that the alkylating agents, perhaps the most<br />

important class of antitumor agent, were not "one" radiomimetic agent with<br />

minor differences with respect to toxicity, route of administration, etc., but<br />

rather were fundamentally different one from the other. This difference,<br />

expressed in terms of lack of cross-resistance, could provide a major basis for<br />

combination alkylating agent therapy. Indeed, Schabel and colleagues went<br />

on to demonstrate that various combinations of alkylating agents were<br />

commonly synergistic (2,3). Since such agents have steep dose-response<br />

curves as already indicated, have myelosuppression as the dose-limiting<br />

toxicity, and often have differing nonmyelosuppressive dose-limiting toxicities,<br />

combining them intensively represented an attractive approach to transplant<br />

therapy. However, before proceeding it was necessary to demonstrate their<br />

properties, particularly the lack of cross-resistance, in human tumors.<br />

Accordingly, alkylating agent-resistant lines of human tumors were<br />

produced by prolonged progressive selection pressure (Fig 2). Using a<br />

comparable protocol against a variety of human tumor cell lines, high levels<br />

(4-5 logs) of resistance to methotrexate and resistance in excess of 600-fold<br />

to Adriamycin can be achieved (4).<br />

For nonalkylating agents, it is a generalization that, with appropriate<br />

selection pressure, high levels of resistance can be achieved readily. In<br />

Table 1. Cross-Resistance Among Alkylating Agents (LI210 Mouse Leukemia)<br />

L1210 L1210/CPA L1210/PAM L1210/BCNU L1210/Platinum<br />

CPA 7 a 0-1 5 7 5<br />

PAM 6 4 0 7 5<br />

BCNU 5 5 5 0-1 3<br />

Platinum 5 5 5 5 0-1<br />

Abbreviations: CPA, cyclophosphamide; PAM, phenylalanine mustard; BCNU,<br />

carmustine; platinum, cisplatin.<br />

"Tumor cell kill (in logs) achieved in L1210 in vivo with /_D 1 0<br />

dose of drug.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!