28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

558 High-Dose Therapy of CHS Gliomas<br />

of the CNS were a high priority for evaluation. This report details our<br />

experience treating CNS tumors with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous<br />

bone marrow transplantation (ABMT).<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Institutions<br />

Patients were treated at the following medical centers: Baylor University<br />

Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH;<br />

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; The University of Texas Health<br />

<strong>Science</strong> Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Vanderbilt University,<br />

Nashville, TN; and Washington University, St. Louis, MO. Prior to treatment,<br />

patients gave their informed consent as approved by the individual institutional<br />

review board.<br />

<strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Marrow</strong> Harvest, Cryopreservation, and Reinfusion<br />

<strong>Bone</strong> marrow collection, processing, cryopreservation, storage, and<br />

reinfusion were performed as previously reported (3). The minimum<br />

required cell dose per transplant was greater than 1.0 x 10 8 /kg of body mass.<br />

Evaluation Definitions<br />

Tumor response was evaluated by the criteria of Wilson et al. (4). A<br />

response required improvement evident on a clinical neurologic examination<br />

concomitant with a completed tomography scan of the head demonstrating<br />

less tumor enhancement and mass effect while the patient was on a stable or<br />

decreasing dose of corticosteroids. Patients who died of therapy-related<br />

toxicity were analyzed as having progressive tumor at the date of death.<br />

Survival and response durations were calculated from the date of bone<br />

marrow transplantation for phase 1 and II studies and from the date of<br />

diagnosis for phase III studies.<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

Actuarial survival rate was calculated by the product-limit method of<br />

Kaplan and Meier (5). Confidence-limit intervals were calculated as described<br />

by Simon (6).<br />

Chemotherapy<br />

Three agents, BCNU (carmustine), VP-16-213 (etoposide), and thio-<br />

TEPA, were evaluated in phase I and II studies. Each was administered as<br />

three equal daily infusions followed in 3 or 4 days by ABMT. The combination<br />

of carmustine and etoposide was administered as a 6-day course, 3 days of<br />

carmustine followed by 3 days of etoposide. Carmustine was also evaluated<br />

adjuvantly in a phase 111 study. The results of these studies are shown in<br />

Tables 1 and 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!