28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 First-Remission Autograft forAML<br />

RELATIONSHIP OF PREAUTOGRAFT INTERVAL TO<br />

LEUKEMIA-FREE SURVIVAL<br />

To examine the relevance of preautograft delay, we reviewed our experience<br />

combined with that of six other series that have been reported.<br />

The data were from 95 patients whose characteristics are shown in Table 1.<br />

Cyclophosphamide plus TBI was the chosen ablative protocol for 58 patients;<br />

23 received high-dose combination chemotherapy, and 14 underwent double<br />

autografts and high-dose chemotherapy. No measures were taken to treat the<br />

autograft in vitro in an attempt to remove residual leukemia. Twenty-nine<br />

patients experienced relapse, all but two of these occurring within 12 months of<br />

the autograft. Five patients died of causes other than leukemia. Figure 2 shows<br />

the overall predicted survival and leukemia-free survival rates at 5 years.<br />

The period of remission that had elapsed before the autograft was<br />

variable, even within treatment centers, in this group of patients. To assess the<br />

influence of preautograft delay on leukemia-free survival, the patients were<br />

divided into groupings whose delay was 0-4 months, 5-8 months, and 9-12<br />

months. Excluded from the analysis were patients whose delays were longer<br />

than 12 months and patients who died of reactions.<br />

Predicted disease-free survival rates shown in Figure 3 are for the 31 patients<br />

in the 0- to 4-month delay group, 40 patients in the 5- to 8-month delay group, and<br />

for the 14 patients in the 9- to 12-month delay group.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

As a strategy for maintaining remission in AML and an alternative to<br />

traditional chemotherapy, ablative treatment necessitating ABMT clearly merits<br />

consideration. Although 40-50% of patients have relapsed, relapses have been<br />

uncommon beyond 12 months after the autograft, suggesting that the pattern of<br />

relapse previously observed with chemotherapy is altered. Since the relapse rate<br />

so far is not higher than that of syngeneic-graft recipients with AML* in first<br />

remission, there is little reason to believe that problems of leukemia contamination<br />

of the autograft will be a priority in the immediate future. Preliminary clinical<br />

results of efforts to purge the marrow do not yet show an advantage over the<br />

unpurged results (7).<br />

Current results of autograft are encouraging and the toxicity is acceptable.<br />

Autograft may be more tolerable for patients and a better use of treatment<br />

resources than the alternatives of prolonged intensive chemotherapy (13,14).<br />

Improved methods of eradicating residual disease in the patient seem tobe a<br />

concern of immediate priority. Although augmented TBI has been relatively<br />

ineffective in reducing the relapse rate of patients who received allografts during<br />

relapse (15), these may be more successful if applied during remission.<br />

Equivalent chemotherapy used with allografting during first and second remissions<br />

has an impressive record of eradicating residual disease (16).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!