28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

440 Digital Image Analysis System<br />

useable with minor modifications both on the new generation of faster<br />

microcomputers that use the 80386 microprocessor (29) and with higher<br />

speed graphics hardware based on the new generation of graphics chips (30).<br />

Such increases in computer power should allow more and more automation<br />

to be programmed into the system, resulting in a decrease in the time<br />

required to analyze specimens. An increase in the speed of analysis will allow<br />

the system to be modified to allow quantitation of antigen density on rare cells<br />

of interest (31-34).<br />

The system described here is already suitable for use in monitoring<br />

purging experiments, using H342-marked cells as a model system (23), and<br />

can be readily adapted to the analysis of immunostained clinical specimens.<br />

Employing the appropriate immunostaining reagents, the system should find<br />

use in other areas requiring rare-event analysis, including detection of<br />

minimal leukemic disease in blood or marrow (34) or quantitating infrequent<br />

normal cells such as hematopoietic progenitors in bone marrow.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

This investigation was supported by Naval Medical Research and Development<br />

Command Work unit MF58.527.007.0004. The opinions and<br />

assertions contained herein are the private ones of the writers and are not to<br />

be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Navy<br />

or the naval service at large.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Sharkis SJ, Santos GW, Colvin M. Blood 1980:55:521.<br />

2. Jansen J, Falkenburg JHF, Stepan JDE, LeBien TW. Semin Hematol 1984;21:164.<br />

3. Treleaven JG, Gibson FM, Ugelstad J, Rembaum A, Philip T, Caine GD, Kemshead JT.<br />

Lancet 1984;1:70.<br />

4. Seeger RC, Reynolds CP, Vo DD, ugelstad J, Wells J. Prog Clin Biol Res 1985:175:443.<br />

5. Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, Vo DD, Black AT, Wells J, ugelstad J. Cancer Res 1986;46:5882.<br />

6. Reynolds CP, Moss TJ, Seeger RC, Black AT, Woody JN. Prog Clin Biol Res 1985;175:425.<br />

7. Lauer SJ, Casper JT, Borella L. J Clin Lab Immunol 1978:1:77.<br />

8. Ligler FS, Smith RG, Kettman JR, Hernandez JA, Hirnes JB, Vitetta ES, Clhr JW, Frenkel EP.<br />

Blood 1980:55:792.<br />

9. Froehlich TW, Buchanan GR, Cornet JAM, Sartain PA, Smith RG. Blood 1981;58:214.<br />

10. Bradstock KF, Janossy G, Hoffbrand AV, Ganeshaguru K, Llewellin P, Prentice HG, Bollum<br />

FJ. BrJ Haematol 1981:47:121.<br />

11. Reynolds CP, Smith RG. In Hybridomas in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Mitchell MS,<br />

Oettgen HF, eds. Raven Press, New York, 1982:235.<br />

12. Dantas ME, Brown JP, Thomas MR, Robinson WA, Glode LM. Cancer 1983:52:949.<br />

13. Ryan DH, Mitchell SJ, Hennessy LA, Bauer KD, Horan PK, Cohen HJ. J Immunol Methods<br />

1984:74:115.<br />

14. Moss TJ, Seeger RC, Kindler-Rohrborn A, Marangos PJ, Rajewsky MF, Reynolds CP. Prog<br />

Clin Biol Res 1985;175:367.<br />

15. Bjork R, Marangos P, Moss T, Krailo M, Hammond D, Seeger R. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res<br />

1986:27:203.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!