28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABMT in Neuroblastoma 421<br />

procedure described elsewhere (3; see also Combaret et al. "Eliminating<br />

Burkitt's Cells From Excess <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Marrow</strong> With an Immunomagnetic Purging<br />

Procedure," this volume), except for two patients who received a T-cell<br />

depleted allograft and one whose marrow had been treated by 6-OH<br />

dopamine.<br />

At the time of intensive consolidation, which was always performed after<br />

surgery, and 2 months thereafter, patients were defined as in CR, VGPR, or PR<br />

according to criteria outlined above.<br />

All in group 2 had stage IV disease. Age at diagnosis was 2.7 years<br />

(range, 1 -4.6 years), and the gender ratio was 2:2. The patients' primary<br />

tumors were located in the retroperitoneum. The induction regimen<br />

consisted of PE/CADO (three patients) or ENSG III C (one patient). Before<br />

the graft could be done, all patients died between 4 and 7 months after<br />

treatment had begun.<br />

Group 3 patients were at stage IV, except for two at stage III who had had<br />

grossly incomplete surgery, and one who had a localized esthesioneuroblastoma<br />

(second cancer). There were seven males and three females, the<br />

age at diagnosis being 5.41 years (range, 0.10-18 years). All patients'<br />

primary tumors were located in the retroperitoneal region except for the<br />

temporal esthesioneuroblastoma. Most stage IV patients had bone and bone<br />

marrow metastasis, but two patients had only bone, and one had only bone<br />

marrow invasion. Induction treatment was heterogeneous because most<br />

patients had been referred from elsewhere. Induction duration was 10.4<br />

months (5-15 months). Surgical removal of tumor could be assessed in<br />

seven patients: three had complete removal, one had microscopic residue,<br />

one had macroscopic residue, and two tumors were unresectable.<br />

Massive therapy consisted of one or two ABMT: five patients received<br />

only one graft. Two had the same conditioning as in group 1, one of them<br />

receiving a local boost of 20 Gy to the primary tumor. One patient underwent<br />

similar conditioning, omitting total body irradiation because he had had<br />

previous local irradiation for the esthesioneuroblastoma. One patient<br />

received VM-26 (teniposide), carboplatinum, and high-dose melphalan (see<br />

below for dosages) because of young age at diagnosis. One patient received<br />

carmustine (BCNC1), teniposide, and cisplatin (see below) and a local 24-Gy<br />

boost because of young age at diagnosis. Five patients received one or the<br />

first of two successive high-dose chemotherapy protocols followed by ABMT.<br />

The first conditioning regimen included BCNCJ (300 mg/m 2<br />

in i.v. bolus on<br />

day 10), teniposide (250 mg/m 2 in i.v. bolus on days 2-5), and cisplatin (40<br />

mg/m 2<br />

in i.v. bolus on days 2-6) with marrow infusion on day 7. The second<br />

graft followed the same schedule as described for group 1.<br />

Three patients have completed the two courses, and two patients have<br />

received only one graft as of now.<br />

All patients received immunomagnetically purged marrow once or twice.<br />

Only the patient with an esthesioneuroblastoma received unpurged marrow.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!