28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

420 ABMT in Neuroblastoma<br />

Group 2—Four patients included in the LMCE study who did not receive<br />

ABMT (two suffered drug-related early deaths, one died during surgery, and<br />

one patient's parents refused ABMT).<br />

Group 3—Ten patients referred from outside, including 3 patients who<br />

were either in complete remission (CR, i.e., complete surgical excision,<br />

normal catecholamines, normal marrow as tested by at least four aspirates<br />

and four biopsies under general anesthesia, and a normal bone scan or<br />

biopsied negative residual lesion) or very good partial remission (VGPR, i.e.,<br />

more than 90% surgical removal, normal catecholamines, normal bone<br />

marrow by the same criteria as for CR, and improved bone scan but without<br />

evidence from biopsy). Seven patients were in partial remission (PR) (50% or<br />

greater improvement of at least two of the criteria concerning initial tumor,<br />

catecholamines, marrow, bones, with no progression at any site). The 10<br />

patients had received various treatments and were therefore excluded from<br />

the LMCE study but were included in a protocol of single (5 patients) or<br />

double (5 patients) massive therapy with ABMT.<br />

Our goal was to learn whether inclusion of these different groups in the<br />

final evaluation of the unselected patients would change our conclusions<br />

concerning neuroblastomas with poor prognosis.<br />

PATIENTS AND METHODS<br />

In group 1, all patients were classified as having stage IV neuroblastoma<br />

according to Evans' criteria. The group included 11 male and 8 female<br />

patients with a median age at diagnosis of 3.15 years (range, 1.03-7 years).<br />

The primary tumor in all patients was retroperitoneal but included one jaw,<br />

one thoracic, and one tumor of unknown origin. The patients initially had<br />

bone and bone marrow involvement, except one who had bone marrow<br />

invasion only. Induction treatment included OPEC/CADO (five patients), NB<br />

84 (four patients), NB 85 (five patients), NB 86 (three patients) (1), ENSG<br />

(European Neuroblastoma Study Group) B (two patients). Induction<br />

duration was a median of 7.9 months (range, 4-11 months).<br />

Surgical removal could be assessed in all but two patients (those with<br />

tumors of jaw and tumors of unknown origin); there were five cases of<br />

complete removal, nine of microscopic residue, two of macroscopic residue,<br />

and one tumor was unresectable.<br />

All patients received similar massive therapy including vincristine given<br />

as a bolus injection on day 1 followed by a 24-hour infusion from days 1 to 5<br />

(total 4 mg/m 2 ). High-dose melphalan (180 mg/m 2 ) was given on day 5.<br />

Fractionated total body irradiation was delivered over 3 days in 6 fractions of 2<br />

Gy, with lung protection at 10 Gy.<br />

All bone marrow grafts had been purged by an immunomagnetic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!