28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proposed International Adult Lymphoma Study 325<br />

only and realizing no significant improvement in length of survival (49-53).<br />

This degree of activity is similar to that of other potentially active single agents<br />

in relapsed large cell lymphoma.<br />

Recent in vitro studies suggest that combining cytarabine with cisplatin<br />

may have a marked synergistic effect. These studies were conducted on<br />

LoVo cells, an established human colon carcinoma line (54). When<br />

combined with other antitumor drugs, cisplatin displayed superadditive<br />

effects with hydroxyurea, bleomycin, cis-retinoic acid, BCNC1 (carmustine),<br />

Adriamycin (doxorubicin), mitomycin C, and an unexpectedly strong<br />

synergistic effect was noted with cytarabine. Although cytarabine displayed<br />

no cytotoxicity on LoVo cells when administered alone, when combined with<br />

cisplatin it induced a several-fold increase in lethality over that attained by<br />

cisplatin alone. The expected-to-observed survival ratios, for a cisplatin<br />

concentration of 5 /ig/ml ranged from 1.3 (cytarabine of 100 fJtg/m\) to 12.9<br />

(cytarabine of 1,000 Ltg/ml), providing a considerably higher performance<br />

index than that observed for cisplatin combined with other drugs tested on<br />

the same cell line. This result is not particularly surprising because it<br />

conforms with previous observations on LI 210 leukemia cells; however, what<br />

is remarkable is that although murine leukemia cells are exquisitely sensitive<br />

to cytarabine, even when it is administered as a single agent, the drug is totally<br />

ineffective against cultured human cells, even at concentrations of 10,000<br />

fig/ml. This supports the conclusion that the marked potentiation observed<br />

for the combination originates from a modification of the nature of the DNA<br />

cross-links induced by cisplatin in the presence of large intracellular<br />

concentrations of cytarabine. Perhaps the simultaneous presence of both<br />

agents induces the formation of multimeric platinum pyrimidine complexes<br />

in a structure similar to the "dimers of dinners" described by Lock et al. (55)<br />

for cisplatin-DNA adducts.<br />

The immediate practical impact of these studies is the rationale they<br />

provide for combining cisplatin and cytarabine in clinical trials. Should the<br />

phenomenon discovered for in vitro cells be shared by in vivo tumors, combining<br />

cisplatin and cytarabine could evolve into an effective form of treatment.<br />

An enhanced therapeutic index is an additional advantage for this<br />

combination because, though the antitumor activity of the paired drugs can<br />

be expected to increase, audiological and renal toxicity, unrelated to DNA<br />

damage, should remain unchanged.<br />

The simultaneous administration of these two agents and dexamethasone<br />

in a pilot study did demonstrate the potential benefit of the combination<br />

for patients with progressive lymphomas with prior resistance to doxorubicin.<br />

Four of fourteen patients have achieved CR, and six other patients achieved<br />

PR. Pathological diagnosis included all types of lymphoma, with a predominance<br />

of diffuse large cell lymphoma (one patient with chronic lymphocytic<br />

leukemia and undifferentiated lymphoma also responded). Renal toxicity<br />

from cisplatin has been reported in up to 36% of patients. Toxicity is dose

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!