28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proposed International Adult Lymphoma Study 321<br />

disease and RR, response rates are nearly identical with and without TBI (68%<br />

compared with 72%). Also, 75% of the relapses were isolated and occurred<br />

primarily at the site of initial lymphoma involvement prior to the salvage<br />

therapy, indicating that local control is a major factor. Involved-field<br />

radiotherapy (15-20 Qy) has been advocated by Phillips et a/. (37,38),<br />

following a nonrandomized comparative study favoring this strategy. This<br />

question will be considered in our randomized study (see below).<br />

In this series, patients with marrow involvement were excluded, and<br />

marrow relapses were not a major problem following ABMT. It is impossible<br />

to distinguish relapse owed to failure to eradicate the tumor from relapse<br />

owed to reinfused tumor cells. However, experience with allogeneic bone<br />

marrow transplantation (BMT) suggests that failure of the preparative<br />

regimen is responsible for most relapses (39-43). Encouraging results have<br />

been reported with marrow purging in adult patients with B-cell non-<br />

Hodgkin's lymphoma (44,45), and we would advocate that this issue be<br />

evaluated in a future comparative study. (If regimens without TBI are used, it<br />

is possible that spontaneous marrow recovery could occur; therefore,<br />

intensification therapy without ABMT is also a possible alternative.) However,<br />

in this first international collaborative study, no attempt will be made to purge<br />

marrow prior to ABMT.<br />

In summary, our group's background work confirms that patients who<br />

did not achieve CR on first-line therapy are rarely curable with current highdose<br />

therapy regimens. In patients who relapse after a first CR, a significant<br />

cure rate can be achieved. Patients still responding to conventional doses of<br />

chemotherapy have an outcome superior to that of patients whose tumors are<br />

resistant to rescue protocols (38% compared with 14% 2-year disease-free<br />

survival). Despite strong suggestions from the literature that high-dose<br />

therapy with ABMT is superior to conventional modalities of treatment for<br />

relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a randomized study to clearly determine<br />

whether ABMT adds to survival in a group of potentially curable patients is<br />

needed because of the various selection criteria that until now clearly favored<br />

the ABMT patients. The conclusions of these studies are the following:<br />

1. Massive therapy and ABMT should not be tested in a randomized study of<br />

patients who never reach CR (Fig 8).<br />

2. All patients whose disease has a diffuse histology, either intermediate or<br />

high grade, at first diagnosis are eligible (cases of transformation from<br />

nodular histology are excluded).<br />

3. With the exclusion from the study of patients who never reach a CR in the<br />

course of their disease, the group in SR is the most suitable for comparing<br />

chemotherapy alone with the ABMT strategy.<br />

4. Purging marrow is not a major issue for this group of patients. The study<br />

will concern only selected patients with normal marrow, and no purging<br />

procedures will be allowed in the ABMT arm of the study.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!