28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 AML in First Remission<br />

used in patients older than 50 years and thus is less subject to strict age limits<br />

than allogeneic BMT. On the other hand, since ABMT is not associated with<br />

graft-versus-host disease and interstitial pneumonia, these advantages should<br />

be weighed against the higher probability of relapse of leukemia after<br />

transplantation.<br />

Pilot studies carried out at several centers in first (5,6) and subsequent (7)<br />

remissions of AML suggest promising results from marrow ablative cytotoxic<br />

therapy followed by ABMT in patients with AML. These results now await<br />

confirmation in prospective trials, since one could argue that patients who were<br />

particularly good risks were selected for transplantation in those studies. To<br />

assess the value of ABMT in patients with AML, we initiated a study in which<br />

patients with newly diagnosed AML would receive ABMT or allogeneic BMT<br />

following attainment of complete remission. Patients received allogeneic BMT<br />

when they had an HLA-matched sibling donor and were between 15 and 45<br />

years old; in all other instances, patients received ABMT.<br />

STUDY DESIGNS AND METHODS<br />

Patients received one or two courses of remission-inducing chemotherapy<br />

(daunomycin and /3-cytosine arabinoside) and, after attaining complete<br />

remission, a course of consolidation chemotherapy. Subsequently, the patients<br />

received ABMT or allogeneic BMT unless early relapse interfered. During<br />

complete remission, autologous bone marrow was harvested, cryopreserved,<br />

and reinfused after conditioning chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Pretransplant<br />

conditioning included two separate regimens, the first consisting of /3-cytosine<br />

arabinoside (1 g/m 2<br />

x 4) and amsacrine (115 mg/m 2 ) and the second of<br />

cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and total body irradiation of 8 Gy (lung dose, 7<br />

Gy). The study was begun in December 1984, and our most recent analysis was<br />

completed in June 1986. <strong>Bone</strong> marrow was collected from the iliac crest and<br />

pelvic spine in 2- to 4-ml aspirates and collected in bottles containing<br />

heparinized Hanks' balanced salt solution. The buffy coat (prepared by<br />

centrifugation at 2,000 G) or Ficoll lsopaque-separated cells were filtered<br />

through a nylon gauze and then through a glass filter. Nucleated cells were<br />

counted in Turk solution. Samples from the graft were sent for bacteriological<br />

and granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit (CFC1-GM) cultures. Cells<br />

were frozen in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide and 20% fetal calf serum using a<br />

controlled-rate freezer and stored at -196°C in liquid nitrogen (8). On 2<br />

subsequent days, cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) was administered to the<br />

patients in saline during a 1 -hour infusion under conditions of forced diuresis<br />

(125 ml/hour). Following the start of the cyclophosphamide infusion, mesna<br />

was given in divided portions at -10 minutes, +4 hours, +8 hours, and +12 hours<br />

up to a total dose of 48 mg/kg on each of 2 days.<br />

The marrow graft was thawed on day 0 (8) and then reinfused for 30-45<br />

minutes. The marrow graft was tested with CFC1-GM cultures, which were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!