28.06.2014 Views

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation - Blog Science Connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chemopurging 147<br />

To date, four patients (one ALL and one mixed lineage in CR2, and two<br />

AML—one in first CR [CR1] and one in CR2) have had ex vivo marrow<br />

treatment. The final CFCI-GM recovery was between 0.46 and 1.87 x 10 4 /kg<br />

body weight in these patients (see Table 3). The CFCI-GM recovery after ex<br />

vivo chemotherapy ranged from 5% to 25%, corresponding to an IC74.95.<br />

Table 4 shows the sequential CFCI-GM losses in our first clinical caserecovery<br />

was as anticipated from previous in vitro experiments. The three<br />

CR2 patients received CBV (cyclophosphamide, BCNCI [carmustine], VP-16-<br />

213) preparation chemotherapy as described previously (13), followed by<br />

their purged marrow. Hematologic recovery was a neutrophil count of<br />

100/mm 3<br />

by posttransplantation days 13,16, and 19; a neutrophil count of<br />

500/mm 3 by days 15,23, and 36; platelet count of 50,000/mm 3 was achieved<br />

by days 26, 31, and 36. The acceptable hematopoietic recovery in the<br />

transplanted patients suggests that the multipotent hematopoietic stem cell<br />

has not been seriously damaged, even after freezing.<br />

Figures 1 and 2 show our overall ex vivo strategy for acute leukemic<br />

patients in CR2. To overcome chemotherapy-resistant cells, we plan to add<br />

magnetic separation, using monoclonal antibody (MAb) pools directed at<br />

specific leukemia types. The antibodies are bound to a cobalt magnetic<br />

affinity colloid (see Reading et at "Magnetic Affinity Colloid Elimination of<br />

Specific Cell Populations From <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Marrow</strong>," in this volume). Figure 1<br />

shows the anticipated cell and CFG-GM losses when MAbs are combined with<br />

chemopurging. Figure 2 outlines the planned stepwise development of a safe<br />

and effective combined ex vivo regimen. Once we are confident that there is<br />

still no compromise of hematopoietic recovery on subsequent patients<br />

treated with ex vivo chemotherapy alone, the addition of immunomagnetic<br />

separation will be investigated.<br />

Minimal progenitor cell losses are anticipated with MAbs directed against<br />

ALL cells. However, some antibodies reactive with myeloid leukemia cells<br />

would be expected to reduce CFCI-GM numbers significantly. Both pools of<br />

MAbs would result in mechanical losses of up to 50% CFCI-GM. Therefore, we<br />

Table 3. Clinical Ex Vivo Purging'<br />

CFU-GM/kg * 10<br />

Patient<br />

Aspirate<br />

40-60% Percoll<br />

Interphase Postpurging % IC<br />

% Total<br />

Recovery<br />

1 28.96 9.47 1.87 80.3 6.5<br />

2 37.69 12.44 0.56 95.5 1.5<br />

3 5.05 2.33 0.62 73.6 12.2<br />

4a 9.26 4.38 0.46 87.5 5.0<br />

4b 1.21 1.03 0.08 92.2 6.6<br />

"Using vincristine (1 uglml) + 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (5 ug/ml).<br />

Abbreviations: CFU-GM, granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit; IC,<br />

inhibitory concentration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!