28.06.2014 Views

USER MANUAL SWAN Cycle III version 40.72A

USER MANUAL SWAN Cycle III version 40.72A

USER MANUAL SWAN Cycle III version 40.72A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 Chapter 2<br />

• each wet computational grid point that is linked to only one other wet computational<br />

grid point, is removed and<br />

• each wet computational grid point that has no wet links is removed.<br />

The effect of this filter is that if exception values are used for the depth grid or the<br />

curvi-linear computational grid, one-dimensional water features are ignored in the <strong>SWAN</strong><br />

computations (results at these locations with a width of about one grid step may be<br />

unrealistic). If no exception values are used, the above described filter will not be applied.<br />

As a consequence, one-dimensional features may appear or disappear due to changing<br />

water levels (flooding may create them, drying may reduce two-dimensional features to<br />

one-dimensional features).<br />

The computational time window must be defined by the user in case of nonstationary<br />

runs. The computational window in time must start at a time that is early enough that<br />

the initial state of <strong>SWAN</strong> has propagated through the computational area before reliable<br />

output of <strong>SWAN</strong> is expected. Before this time the output may not be reliable since usually<br />

the initial state is not known and only either no waves or some very young sea state is<br />

assumed for the initial state. This is very often erroneous and this erroneous initial state<br />

is propagated into the computational area.<br />

The computational time step must be given by the user in case of nonstationary runs. Since,<br />

<strong>SWAN</strong> is based on implicit numerical schemes, it is not limited by the Courant stability<br />

criterion (which couples time and space steps). In this sense, the time step in <strong>SWAN</strong> is<br />

not restricted. However, the accuracy of the results of <strong>SWAN</strong> are obviously affected by<br />

the time step. Generally, the time step in <strong>SWAN</strong> should be small enough to resolve the<br />

time variations of computed wave field itself. Usually, it is enough to consider the time<br />

variations of the driving fields (wind, currents, water depth, wave boundary conditions).<br />

But be careful: relatively(!) small time variations in depth (e.g. by tide) can result in<br />

relatively(!) large variations in the wave field.<br />

As default, the first guess conditions of a stationary run of <strong>SWAN</strong> are determined with the<br />

2 nd generation mode of <strong>SWAN</strong>. The initial condition of a nonstationary run of <strong>SWAN</strong> is<br />

by default a JONSWAP spectrum with a cos 2 (θ) directional distribution centred around<br />

the local wind direction.<br />

A quasi-stationary approach can be employed with stationary <strong>SWAN</strong> computations in a<br />

time-varying sequence of stationary conditions.<br />

The computational spectral grid needs to be provided by the user. In frequency space,<br />

it is simply defined by a minimum and a maximum frequency and the frequency resolution<br />

which is proportional to the frequency itself (i.e. logarithmic, e.g., ∆f = 0.1 f). The<br />

frequency domain may be specified as follows (see command CGRID):<br />

• The lowest frequency, the highest frequency and the number of frequencies can be<br />

chosen.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!