28.06.2014 Views

USER MANUAL SWAN Cycle III version 40.72A

USER MANUAL SWAN Cycle III version 40.72A

USER MANUAL SWAN Cycle III version 40.72A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

General definitions and remarks 11<br />

(they need not be identical with the computational, output or other input windows). It is<br />

best to make an input window larger than the computational time window. <strong>SWAN</strong> assumes<br />

zero values at times before the earliest begin time of the input parameters (which may be<br />

the begin time of any input parameter such as wind). <strong>SWAN</strong> assumes constant values<br />

(the last values) at times after the end time of each input parameter. The input windows<br />

should start early enough so that the initial state of <strong>SWAN</strong> has propagated through the<br />

computational area before reliable output of <strong>SWAN</strong> is expected.<br />

One should choose the spatial resolution for the input grids such that relevant spatial details<br />

in the bathymetry, currents, bottom friction and wind are properly resolved. Special<br />

care is required in cases with sharp and shallow ridges (sand bars, shoals) in the sea bottom<br />

and extremely steep bottom slopes. Very inaccurate bathymetry can result in very<br />

inaccurate refraction computations the results of which can propagate into areas where<br />

refraction as such is not significant (the results may appear to be unstable). For instance,<br />

waves skirting an island that is poorly resolved may propagate beyond the island with<br />

entirely wrong directions. In such a case it may even be better to deactivate the refraction<br />

computations (if refraction is irrelevant for the problem at hand e.g. because the refracted<br />

waves will run into the coast anyway and one is not interested in that part of the coast).<br />

In such cases the ridges are vitally important to obtain good <strong>SWAN</strong> results (at sea the<br />

waves are ’clipped’ by depth-induced breaking over the ridges which must therefore represented<br />

in <strong>SWAN</strong> computation). This requires not only that these ridges should be well<br />

represented on the input grid but also after interpolation on the computational grid. This<br />

can be achieved by choosing the grid lines of the input grid along the ridges (even if this<br />

may require some slight ”shifting” of the ridges) and choosing the computational grid to<br />

be identical to the input grid (otherwise the ridge may be ”lost” in the interpolation from<br />

the bottom input grid to the computational grid).<br />

Finally, one should use a time step that is small enough that time variations in the<br />

bathymetry, current, water level, wind and bottom friction are well resolved.<br />

2.6.3 Computational grids and boundary / initial / first guess<br />

conditions<br />

The computational spatial grid must be defined by the user. The orientation (direction)<br />

can be chosen arbitrarily.<br />

The boundaries of the computational spatial grid in <strong>SWAN</strong> are either land or water. In the<br />

case of land there is no problem: the land does not generate waves and in <strong>SWAN</strong> it absorbs<br />

all incoming wave energy. But in the case of a water boundary there may be a problem.<br />

Often no wave conditions are known along such a boundary and <strong>SWAN</strong> then assumes<br />

that no waves enter the area and that waves can leave the area freely. These assumptions<br />

obviously contain errors which propagate into the model. These boundaries must therefore<br />

be chosen sufficiently far away from the area where reliable computations are needed so

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!