26.06.2014 Views

Design of effective systems for controlled radical polymerization of ...

Design of effective systems for controlled radical polymerization of ...

Design of effective systems for controlled radical polymerization of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Macromol. Rapid Commun. 20, 351–355 (1999) 351<br />

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>effective</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>controlled</strong> <strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> styrene: Application <strong>of</strong> 4,49-dimethyl and 5,59-dimethyl 2,29-<br />

bipyridine copper(II) complexes<br />

Ulrich S. Schubert*, Georg Hochwimmer, Christian E. Spindler, Oskar Nuyken*<br />

Lehrstuhl für Makromolekulare St<strong>of</strong>fe, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstr. 4,<br />

D-85747 Garching, Germany<br />

ulrich.schubert@ch.tum.de<br />

(Received: October 29, 1998; revised a : March 4, 1999)<br />

SUMMARY: [Cu(II)(4,49-dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 (2) and [Cu(II) (5,59-dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine)<br />

3 ](PF 6 ) 2 (4) were used together with aluminium isopropoxide and (1-bromoethyl)benzene in the <strong>controlled</strong><br />

<strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene resulting in polystyrenes with predetermined molecular weight and narrow<br />

molecular weight distribution. The received polymers are colorless with a content <strong>of</strong> copper lower than<br />

210 ppm. The substitution pattern at the bipyridine ligands has a distinct influence on the <strong>polymerization</strong>.<br />

The rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene using 2/[(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al/C 6 H 5 CH(CH 3 )Br is two times larger than utilizing<br />

4/[(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al/C 6 H 5 CH(CH 3 )Br.<br />

Introduction<br />

Radical <strong>polymerization</strong> processes are <strong>of</strong> great importance<br />

in polymer chemistry <strong>for</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> high molecular<br />

weight polymers 1) . However, deficits in control <strong>of</strong><br />

both the obtained molecular weight and the resulting<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the polymers are major drawbacks in conventional<br />

<strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong>. This is mainly due to chain<br />

transfer and termination processes. In the last years it has<br />

been successfully demonstrated that <strong>controlled</strong> (“living”)<br />

free <strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> techniques can be utilized to<br />

prepare polymers <strong>of</strong> predetermined molecular weights<br />

with narrow polydispersities. Among the promising<br />

investigations in this field are nitroxide-mediated <strong>polymerization</strong>s<br />

2–4) , ruthenium(II) and cobalt(II)-mediated<br />

<strong>polymerization</strong>s 5–7) , triazolinyl-based <strong>polymerization</strong>s 8)<br />

and atom transfer <strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> (ATRP) 9–18) .<br />

Especially, ATRP seems to be suitable <strong>for</strong> the preparation<br />

<strong>of</strong> polystyrenes and polyacrylates with <strong>controlled</strong> molecular<br />

weights and narrow molecular weight distributions.<br />

The favored system <strong>for</strong> this kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

styrene and acrylates contains besides alkyl halides bipyridine<br />

ligands and copper(I) salts 9–15) (sometimes bipyridines<br />

are replaced by 1,10-phenanthroline 19) ). However,<br />

this system has several disadvantages: The resulting polymers<br />

are quite <strong>of</strong>ten colored due to the high amount <strong>of</strong><br />

copper in these polymers which is difficult to remove.<br />

Combined with the sometimes slow rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong><br />

this is contradictionary to a potential application in<br />

polymer industry. The present paper describes the first<br />

results <strong>of</strong> a systematic approach to overcome some <strong>of</strong><br />

these problems by application <strong>of</strong> well-defined metallosupramolecular<br />

complexes with special N-heterocyclic<br />

ligands instead <strong>of</strong> bipyridine/metal salts mixtures.<br />

Experimental part<br />

Materials<br />

4,49-Dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine (1) was used as received<br />

(Aldrich and Reilly Tar & Chem. Corp). 5,59-Dimethyl-2,29-<br />

bipyridine (3) was synthesized utilizing a novel procedure<br />

starting from 2-amino-5-methylpyridine 20) . The Cu(CH 3 -<br />

COO) 2 6H 2 O was used as received (Aldrich). Styrene was<br />

purified by distillation under reduced pressure after destabilizing<br />

by passing through an alumina column. (1-Bromoethyl)benzene<br />

(Aldrich), aluminium isopropoxide<br />

(Aldrich), 1,4-benzoquinone (Fluka) and acetonitrile (HPLC<br />

grade, Fluka) were used as received.<br />

Instruments<br />

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analysis was per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

on a Waters Liquid Chromatograph system using<br />

Shodex GPC K-802S columns and the Waters Differential<br />

Refractometer 410 with chlor<strong>of</strong>orm as eluent. Calibration<br />

was conducted with polystyrene standards. UV/VIS measurements<br />

were recorded using a Varian Cary 3.<br />

Synthesis <strong>of</strong> the supramolecular complexes<br />

[Cu(II)(4,49-dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 (2): 4,49-Dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine<br />

(1) was suspended in MeOH/H 2 O<br />

(1:1) under nitrogen. A solution <strong>of</strong> Cu(CH 3 COO) 2 6H 2 Oin<br />

H 2 O was added and the blue colored solution was refluxed<br />

<strong>for</strong> 6 h. After addition <strong>of</strong> an excess <strong>of</strong> a saturated solution <strong>of</strong><br />

a<br />

Delayed due to patent application.<br />

Macromol. Rapid Commun. 20, No. 6 i WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim 1999 1022-1336/99/0606–0351$17.50+.50/0


352 U. S. Schubert, G. Hochwimmer, Ch. E. Spindler, O. Nuyken<br />

NH 4 PF 6 in CH 3 OH immediately a blue solid precipitated.<br />

The solid was filtered <strong>of</strong>f, washed with MeOH, H 2 O and<br />

diethylether, dissolved in acetone and precipitated in diethyl<br />

ether. After filtration the solid was dissolved in a small<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> acetone. By slow diffusion <strong>of</strong> diethyl ether into<br />

the solution blue crystals <strong>of</strong> 2 (93%) were obtained.<br />

UV/VIS (CH 3 CN): k max /nm (e/(L N mol –1 N cm –1 )) = 285<br />

(3270).<br />

C 36 H 36 N 6 CuP 2 F 12 62H 2 O (942.2)<br />

Calc. C 45.98 N 8.92 H 4.28<br />

Found C 45.97 N 8.81 H 4.21<br />

[Cu(II)(5,59-dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 (4): 5,59-Dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine<br />

(3) was dissolved in CH 3 OH under<br />

nitrogen. A solution <strong>of</strong> Cu(CH 3 COO) 2 6H 2 O in H 2 O was<br />

added and the blue solution was refluxed <strong>for</strong> 5 h. After addition<br />

<strong>of</strong> an excess <strong>of</strong> a saturated solution <strong>of</strong> NH 4 PF 6 in<br />

CH 3 OH immediately a blue colored solid appeared. The mixture<br />

was refluxed <strong>for</strong> another 5 min and was then allowed to<br />

cool to room temperature. The remaining solid was filtered<br />

<strong>of</strong>f, washed with MeOH, H 2 O and diethyl ether, dissolved in<br />

acetone and precipitated in diethyl ether. After filtration the<br />

solid was dissolved in a small amount <strong>of</strong> acetone and crystallized<br />

in diethyl ether to yield 84% <strong>of</strong> 4 as blue crystals.<br />

UV/VIS (CH 3 CN): k max /nm (e/(L N mol –1 N cm –1 )) = 251<br />

(47830), 299 (39420).<br />

C 36 H 36 N 6 CuP 2 F 12 (906.2)<br />

Calc. C 47.72 N 9.27 H 4.00<br />

Found C 47.68 N 9.29 H 3.96<br />

Polymerizations<br />

A typical procedure was as follows: [(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al<br />

(59.64 mg, 0.292 mmol) and styrene (5.32 g, 51 mmol) were<br />

added to a solution <strong>of</strong> the copper bipyridine complex<br />

(0.073 mmol, 2: 68.78 mg, 4: 66.15 mg) in CH 3 CN (1.6 mL)<br />

under argon. After addition <strong>of</strong> (1-bromoethyl)benzene<br />

(13.44 mg, 0.073 mmol) the reaction mixture was degassed<br />

by three freeze/pump cycles. Then the mixture was heated to<br />

758C (oil bath) and kept at this temperature during <strong>polymerization</strong>.<br />

Samples (0.1 mL) were taken in distinct time intervals<br />

and quenched with 1,4-benzoquinone in CH 2 Cl 2 (2 mL,<br />

27 g/L, 0.25 mol/L). The polymer samples were precipitated<br />

in methanol and dried in vacuo at 508C. The conversion was<br />

determined gravimetrically.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

The main focus <strong>of</strong> our approach in <strong>controlled</strong> <strong>radical</strong><br />

<strong>polymerization</strong> is the design <strong>of</strong> new <strong>effective</strong> <strong>systems</strong><br />

which circumvent some <strong>of</strong> the drawbacks <strong>of</strong> established<br />

<strong>systems</strong>. In typical procedures a ratio <strong>of</strong> 2:1:1:100<br />

(bipyridine:copper(I) salt:alkyl halide:monomer) is<br />

used 9–11) (also a 3:1:1:100 ratio is <strong>of</strong>ten applied, see e.g.<br />

ref. 21) ). Copper(I) chloride or copper(I) bromide is dispersed<br />

in monomer and a bipyridine is added separately.<br />

It is assumed that a bipyridine complex is <strong>for</strong>med in situ.<br />

Fig. 1. Wireframe models <strong>of</strong> the complexes: left: [Cu(II)(4,49-<br />

dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 (2); right: [Cu(II)(5,59-<br />

dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 (4) (MAC Spartan Plus, level<br />

MM2, PF 6 counter ions are omitted)<br />

The resulting polymers are quite <strong>of</strong>ten colored, due to a<br />

rather high residual metal concentration in the resulting<br />

polymer 22) . There<strong>for</strong>e, it was worthwhile to test welldefined,<br />

already pre<strong>for</strong>med bipyridine metal complexes<br />

<strong>for</strong> this <strong>polymerization</strong>. We see an advantage over its in<br />

situ <strong>for</strong>mation by mixing together the components. In our<br />

investigations we have further studied the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

the bipyridine substitution pattern (4-, 5- and preliminary<br />

the 6-positions) <strong>for</strong> the <strong>polymerization</strong> process.<br />

We first choose two different types <strong>of</strong> ligands. 4,49-<br />

Dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine (1) is commercially available,<br />

whereas the corresponding 5,59-dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine<br />

(3) was synthesized in high yield using Stille type carbon-carbon<br />

bond <strong>for</strong>ming reaction utilizing organo-tin<br />

intermediates (72% from commercial starting materials<br />

20) ). The copper complexes <strong>of</strong> the bipyridines 1 and 3<br />

could be obtained by reaction with an appropriate copper(II)<br />

salt yielding blue crystalline materials (2: 93%, 4:<br />

84%, isolated as PF 6 salts). The wireframe models <strong>of</strong> the<br />

octahedral complexes 2 and 4 are shown in Fig. 1. These<br />

metallo-supramolecular <strong>systems</strong> were used <strong>for</strong> the <strong>polymerization</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> styrene (Scheme 1). The monomer and aluminium<br />

isopropoxide were added to solutions <strong>of</strong> the complexes<br />

in acetonitrile (1:700 complex to monomer ratio).<br />

After addition <strong>of</strong> an alkyl halide (e.g. (1-bromoethyl)benzene,<br />

1:1 complex to initiator ratio) the reaction mixtures<br />

were heated to 758C. Samples were taken at different<br />

times and quenched with 1,4-benzoquinone. The role <strong>of</strong><br />

the aluminium isopropoxide is yet not clear. We assume<br />

that it acts as Lewis acid lowering the dissociation energy<br />

Scheme 1:


<strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>effective</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>controlled</strong> <strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene: ... 353<br />

Tab. 1. Molecular weight data <strong>for</strong> the investigated polystyrenes<br />

in the presence <strong>of</strong> 2 (aluminium isopropoxide: 0.292 mmol; styrene:<br />

51 mmol; ratio 2: (1-bromoethyl)benzene = 1:1; ratio 2:<br />

monomer = 1:700)<br />

Time<br />

in min<br />

Conversion<br />

in %<br />

M n …GPC†<br />

g=mol<br />

M w …GPC†<br />

g=mol<br />

M — w/M — n<br />

Fig. 2. Dependence <strong>of</strong> monomer conversion as function <strong>of</strong><br />

time in the <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene at 758C using 2<br />

([(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al: 0.292 mmol; styrene: 51 mmol; ratio 2: (1-<br />

bromoethyl)benzene = 1:1; ratio 2: monomer = 1:700)<br />

140 3.0 2220 5770 2.60 a)<br />

210 4.6 3340 6 010 1.80 a)<br />

295 7.1 5220 7200 1.38 a)<br />

530 13.0 7500 8250 1.10<br />

665 19.4 13220 14410 1.09<br />

1310 34.6 21860 24710 1.13<br />

1585 42.2 21130 23880 1.13<br />

1905 49.1 26120 30820 1.18<br />

2880 69.8 35000 49700 1.42<br />

a)<br />

A second small peak at higher molecular weights was<br />

referred to un<strong>controlled</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene and not<br />

used in the calculation.<br />

Fig. 3. Dependence <strong>of</strong> molecular weights (f) and polydispersities<br />

(9) as function <strong>of</strong> monomer conversion in the <strong>polymerization</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> styrene at 758C using 2 ([(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al: 0.292 mmol;<br />

styrene: 51 mmol; ratio 2: (1-bromoethyl)benzene = 1:1; ratio<br />

2: monomer = 1:700)<br />

Fig. 4. GPC curves (chlor<strong>of</strong>orm as eluent) <strong>for</strong> a few samples<br />

obtained during <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene in the presence <strong>of</strong> 2<br />

([(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al: 0.292 mmol; styrene: 51 mmol; ratio 2: (1-<br />

bromoethyl)benzene = 1:1; ratio 2: monomer = 1:700); (a)<br />

19.4% conversion, (b) 42.2% conversion, (c) 49.1% conversion)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the halogen-carbon bond. This assumption is supported<br />

by the observation that a <strong>controlled</strong> <strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong><br />

at 758C is not possible without aluminium isopropoxide<br />

(see also similar results <strong>for</strong> the <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

MMA with RuCl 2 (PPh 3 ) 3 <strong>systems</strong> 23) ). Experiments utilizing<br />

higher <strong>polymerization</strong> temperatures are currently in<br />

progress. Fig. 2 shows the linear dependence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

monomer conversion as function <strong>of</strong> time using 2. A complete<br />

monomer conversion can be obtained after approximately<br />

65 h. The dependence <strong>of</strong> the number average<br />

molecular weights and the corresponding polydispersities<br />

<strong>of</strong> polystyrene as function <strong>of</strong> conversion are plotted in<br />

Fig. 3 showing a linear relationship between number<br />

average molecular weight <strong>of</strong> the polymers and monomer<br />

conversion. The observed polydispersities are rather<br />

broad at low conversions. However, they narrow above<br />

10% conversion and reach a level typical <strong>for</strong> living <strong>systems</strong><br />

(M — w/M — n between 1.1 and 1.4, see Tab. 1). The results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the GPC investigations <strong>for</strong> three samples taken at different<br />

times are shown in Fig. 4 ((a): t = 665 min, C =<br />

19.4%; (b): t = 1585 min, C = 42.2%; (c): t = 1905 min,<br />

C = 49.1%). Experiments with much lower complex to<br />

monomer ratio (1:4000) resulted again in a <strong>controlled</strong><br />

<strong>polymerization</strong> with narrow molecular weight distributions.<br />

A very promising result was observed concerning the<br />

color <strong>of</strong> the polymers and the copper contents. After precipitation<br />

in methanol the obtained polymer samples<br />

were completely colorless. Furthermore, using UV/VIS<br />

spectroscopy the typical p-p* transition band <strong>of</strong> the complexes<br />

could not be found (Fig. 5, curve a). The absorption<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> the polystyrene were similar to polystyrene<br />

obtained by auto<strong>polymerization</strong> (Fig. 5, curve b).<br />

However, addition <strong>of</strong> only 20 lg complex to 1 mg poly-


354 U. S. Schubert, G. Hochwimmer, Ch. E. Spindler, O. Nuyken<br />

Fig. 5. UV/VIS spectra: curve (a): polystyrene obtained in the presence <strong>of</strong> 2; curve (b): polystyrene<br />

obtained from auto<strong>polymerization</strong>; curve (c) 20 lg 2 added to 1 mg <strong>of</strong> polystyrene (in<br />

CHCl 3 :CH 3 CN = 5:1). Concentrations: (a) 0.50 mg PS/mL; (b) and (c) 0.46 mg PS/mL<br />

Fig. 6. Dependence <strong>of</strong> monomer conversion as function <strong>of</strong><br />

time in the <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene at 758C in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

4 ([(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al: 0.292 mmol; styrene: 51 mmol; ratio 4: (1-<br />

bromoethyl)benzene = 1:2; ratio 4: monomer = 1:700)<br />

Fig. 7. Dependence <strong>of</strong> molecular weights (f) and polydispersities<br />

(9) as function <strong>of</strong> monomer conversion in the <strong>polymerization</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> styrene at 758C in the presence <strong>of</strong> 4 ([(CH 3 ) 2 CHO] 3 Al:<br />

0.292 mmol; styrene: 51 mmol; ratio 4: (1-bromoethyl)benzene<br />

= 1:2; ratio 4: monomer = 1:700)<br />

styrene obtained from auto<strong>polymerization</strong> gave a significant<br />

p-p* transition band (Fig. 5, curve c). There<strong>for</strong>e it<br />

can be concluded, that the content <strong>of</strong> copper in the sample<br />

is less than 150 ppm. First experiments utilizing AAS<br />

gave a copper content <strong>of</strong> 210 ppm (compared to 150 ppm<br />

<strong>of</strong> a polystyrene obtained from auto<strong>polymerization</strong>). The<br />

aluminium content is lower than 2.5 ppm (flame AAS).<br />

Polymerization <strong>of</strong> styrene utilizing bipyridine/metal salt<br />

mixtures gave polymers with a copper content <strong>of</strong> 2000 to<br />

2500 ppm.<br />

Similar linear relationships between molecular weights<br />

<strong>of</strong> the polystyrenes on conversion and conversion on time<br />

could be observed when 2 was replaced by 5,59-dimethyl-<br />

2,29-bipyridine copper(II) complex 4 in the reaction mixture<br />

(Fig. 6 and 7). However, using 4 the <strong>polymerization</strong><br />

rate drops to the half (e.g. 20% conversion after 30 h <strong>for</strong><br />

4 compared to 40% conversion after 30 h <strong>for</strong> 2). The<br />

observed polydispersities vary between 1.2 and 1.4<br />

(Tab. 2). However, in this case narrow molecular weight<br />

distributions could be found already at low conversions.<br />

Further investigations using 6,69-dimethyl-2,29-bipyridine<br />

copper complexes are in progress. First results showed a<br />

very fast <strong>polymerization</strong> up to 10% conversion with quite<br />

broad polydispersities.


<strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>effective</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>controlled</strong> <strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene: ... 355<br />

Tab. 2. Molecular weight data <strong>for</strong> the investigated polystyrenes<br />

in the presence <strong>of</strong> 4 (aluminium isopropoxide: 0.292 mmol; styrene:<br />

51 mmol; ratio 4: (1-bromoethyl)benzene = 1:2; ratio 4:<br />

monomer = 1:700)<br />

Time<br />

in min<br />

Conclusions<br />

Conversion<br />

in %<br />

M n …GPC†<br />

g=mol<br />

M w …GPC†<br />

g=mol<br />

M — w/M — n<br />

260 4.1 1090 1310 1.22 a)<br />

1170 9.6 2120 2760 1.35 a)<br />

1750 17.1 4210 5890 1.46<br />

2045 23.1 5410 7580 1.45<br />

2690 28.9 5820 7560 1.35<br />

a)<br />

A second small peak at higher molecular weights was<br />

referred to un<strong>controlled</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong> <strong>of</strong> styrene and not<br />

used in the calculation.<br />

It could be shown that a mixture <strong>of</strong> 2,29-bipyridine copper(II)<br />

complexes in conjunction with aluminium isopropoxide<br />

and (1-bromoethyl)benzene is able to polymerize<br />

styrene. The <strong>polymerization</strong> rate depends strongly on<br />

the substitution pattern <strong>of</strong> the bipyridine ligands. The<br />

described <strong>systems</strong> allow a good control <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />

weight and molecular weight distribution <strong>of</strong> polystyrene.<br />

However, the mechanism <strong>of</strong> this reaction and the fundamental<br />

steps are not yet well-understood and there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

further investigations are necessary. The difference <strong>of</strong> our<br />

<strong>systems</strong> over established bipyridine/copper(I)/alkyl halide<br />

<strong>systems</strong> are the completely colorless products with very<br />

low contents <strong>of</strong> copper as well as the low reaction temperature.<br />

These findings opens new avenues to develop<br />

<strong>effective</strong> and useful <strong>systems</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>controlled</strong> <strong>radical</strong> <strong>polymerization</strong>.<br />

Acknowledgement: The research was supported partly by the<br />

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Unterricht, Kultus, Wissenschaft<br />

und Kunst and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.<br />

We thank Reilly Tar & Chem. Corp. <strong>for</strong> contributing 1.<br />

1) G. Moad, D. H. Solomon, The Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Free-Radical<br />

Polymerization, Pergamon, Ox<strong>for</strong>d 1995<br />

2) M. K. Georges, R. P. N. Veregin, P. N. Kazmaier, G. K.<br />

Hamer, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 68, 6 (1993)<br />

3) M. K. Georges, R. P. N. Veregin, P. N. Kazmaier, G. K.<br />

Hamer, M. Saban, Macromolecules 27, 7228 (1994)<br />

4) C. J. Hawker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 11185 (1994)<br />

5) M. Sawamoto, M. Kamigaito, Trends Polym. Sci. 4, 371<br />

(1996)<br />

6) H. Uegaki, Y. Kotani, M. Kamigaito, M. Sawamoto, Macromolecules<br />

30, 2249 (1997)<br />

7) J. Ueda, M. Matsuyama, M. Kamigaito, M. Sawamoto,<br />

Macromolecules 31, 557 (1998)<br />

8) D. Colombani, M. Steenbock, M. Klapper, K. Müllen,<br />

Macromol. Rapid Commun. 18, 243 (1997)<br />

9) J.-S. Wang, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 28, 7901<br />

(1995)<br />

10) T. Patten, J. Xia, T. Abernathy, K. Matyjaszewski, Science<br />

272, 866 (1996)<br />

11) K. Matyjaszewski, T. Patten, J. Xia, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119,<br />

674 (1997)<br />

12) K. Matyjaszewski, Y. Nakagawa, S. G. Gaynor, Macromol.<br />

Rapid Commun. 18, 1057 (1997)<br />

13) K. Davis, J. O’Malley, H.-J. Paik, K. Matyjaszewski, Polym.<br />

Prepr. (Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Polym. Chem.) 38(1), 687<br />

(1997)<br />

14) K. Matyjaszewski, D. A. Shipp, J.-L. Wang, T. Grimaud, T.<br />

E. Patten, Macromolecules 31, 6836 (1998)<br />

15) Controlled Radical Polymerization, K. Matyjaszewski, Ed.,<br />

ACS Symp. Ser. 685 (1998)<br />

16) Y. Yagci, M. K. Mishra, Living Radical Polymerization, in:<br />

Handbook <strong>of</strong> Radical Vinyl Polymerization, M. K. Mishra, Y.<br />

Yagci, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York 1998, p. 233<br />

17) B. Gao, X. Chen, B. Iván, J. Kops, W. Batsberg, Polym. Bull.<br />

(Berlin) 39, 559 (1997)<br />

18) V. Percec, B. Barboiu, A. Neumann, J. C. Ronda, M. Zhao,<br />

Macromolecules 29, 3665 (1996)<br />

19) M. Destarac, J.-M. Bessière, B. Boutevin, Macromol. Rapid<br />

Commun. 18, 967 (1997)<br />

20) U. S. Schubert, C. Eschbaumer, G. Hochwimmer, Tetrahedron<br />

Lett. 39, 8643 (1998)<br />

21) J. Qui, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 30, 5643 (1997)<br />

22) A. Mühlebach, S. G. Gaynor, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules<br />

31, 6046 (1998)<br />

23) T. Ando, M. Kato, M. Kamigaito, M. Sawamoto, Macromolecules<br />

29, 1070 (1996)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!