Costing Mobile Service Models in Tanzania - the RESPOND Project!

Costing Mobile Service Models in Tanzania - the RESPOND Project! Costing Mobile Service Models in Tanzania - the RESPOND Project!

respond.project.org
from respond.project.org More from this publisher

<strong>Cost<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

<strong>Models</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

Presentation to LA/PM Community of<br />

Practice<br />

<strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>Service</strong>s Work<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />

May 23, 2011


Why worry about costs?<br />

Resource constra<strong>in</strong>ts are real<br />

Access, quality and costs are<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter-related<br />

Goal of health system: to<br />

maximize “health” subject to<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g resource constra<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Cost <strong>in</strong>formation helps <strong>in</strong>form<br />

decisions – resource allocation,<br />

scale-up, affordability, efficiency,<br />

etc.


Production Model for FP Acceptors<br />

INPUTS<br />

PROCESSES<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOMES<br />

• Provider time<br />

• Support staff time<br />

• Consumables<br />

• Capital (facilities,<br />

vehicles)<br />

Delivery System<br />

•cl<strong>in</strong>ic<br />

•commun -based<br />

organization<br />

•mobile services<br />

<strong>Service</strong>s provided thru:<br />

•cl<strong>in</strong>ic visits<br />

•community health<br />

workers<br />

•mobile outreach<br />

events<br />

• Higher contraceptive<br />

use<br />

• Fewer unplanned<br />

pregnancies<br />

Efficiency Cost-Effectiveness


LA/PM Decision Cascade<br />

Should extra<br />

effort be made to<br />

improve access<br />

to LA/PMs ?<br />

• Access,<br />

Equity<br />

How should<br />

LA/PMs be<br />

provided to rural<br />

populations?<br />

• Effectiveness,<br />

Cost-effectiveness<br />

How should<br />

mobile outreach<br />

services be<br />

configured?<br />

• Efficiency


Objectives of Cost Analysis<br />

To measure costs of ongo<strong>in</strong>g mobile service<br />

delivery<br />

– ATP-supported “family plann<strong>in</strong>g weeks”<br />

– ATP-supported outreach events<br />

– MST outreach expeditions<br />

To compute average cost per LA/PM acceptor<br />

(overall and by contraceptive method)<br />

To describe components of costs of mobile service<br />

delivery


Program Outputs<br />

Data Requirements<br />

– Acceptors of LA/PMs by outreach event and method<br />

Program Inputs<br />

– Staff (providers, supervisors, drivers)<br />

– Consumables (contraceptives, surgical supplies)<br />

– Lodg<strong>in</strong>g, perdiem and fuel<br />

– Capital (vehicles, facilities, equipment)<br />

– Zonal Office overhead<br />

Specification of process whereby <strong>in</strong>puts are transformed<br />

<strong>in</strong>to outputs


Methodology<br />

Retrospective, focus<strong>in</strong>g on 2010<br />

Perspective: programmatic (site level and zonal office)<br />

Unit of analysis: <strong>the</strong> outreach event or expedition<br />

Source of data: event narratives and associated expense<br />

reports<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g plan (aspirational):<br />

– ATP: one FP week and one outreach event, purposively selected<br />

for each prov<strong>in</strong>ce (n=24)<br />

– MST: 30 expeditions (six teams over five months)


Data Collection<br />

Ongo<strong>in</strong>g, us<strong>in</strong>g custom<br />

Excel spreadsheets to<br />

extract and organize<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on salaries,<br />

benefits, per-diems,<br />

contraceptives, medical<br />

supplies, fuel, vehicles,<br />

equipment and facilities


Data Analysis<br />

Total cost per event or expedition (<strong>in</strong>cludes site<br />

costs plus zonal office overhead)<br />

Cost per LA/PM acceptor, overall and by method


Challenges<br />

• Information not<br />

organized to enable<br />

simple extraction of<br />

costs of mobile<br />

outreach<br />

• Resources come from<br />

different entities, no<br />

central repository of<br />

cost <strong>in</strong>formation


Challenges, cont’<br />

• Uneven data quality (completeness, <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

consistency, legibility)<br />

• Complexity of MoH personnel classification<br />

system<br />

• Unclear how many different outreach models<br />

actually exist<br />

• Staff turnover


Next Steps<br />

ATP: Completion of data<br />

extraction for 12 events <strong>in</strong><br />

one zone; receipt of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on costs of<br />

supplies, vehicles and<br />

overhead<br />

MST: Receipt of<br />

categorized expenditure<br />

data for 30 outreach<br />

expeditions<br />

Analysis and report<strong>in</strong>g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!