Costing Mobile Service Models in Tanzania - the RESPOND Project!
Costing Mobile Service Models in Tanzania - the RESPOND Project! Costing Mobile Service Models in Tanzania - the RESPOND Project!
Costing Mobile Service Models in Tanzania Presentation to LA/PM Community of Practice Mobile Services Working Group May 23, 2011
- Page 2 and 3: Why worry about costs? Resource con
- Page 4 and 5: LA/PM Decision Cascade Should extra
- Page 6 and 7: Program Outputs Data Requirements -
- Page 8 and 9: Data Collection Ongoing, using cust
- Page 10 and 11: Challenges • Information not orga
- Page 12: Next Steps ATP: Completion of data
<strong>Cost<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />
<strong>Models</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />
Presentation to LA/PM Community of<br />
Practice<br />
<strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>Service</strong>s Work<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />
May 23, 2011
Why worry about costs?<br />
Resource constra<strong>in</strong>ts are real<br />
Access, quality and costs are<br />
<strong>in</strong>ter-related<br />
Goal of health system: to<br />
maximize “health” subject to<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g resource constra<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Cost <strong>in</strong>formation helps <strong>in</strong>form<br />
decisions – resource allocation,<br />
scale-up, affordability, efficiency,<br />
etc.
Production Model for FP Acceptors<br />
INPUTS<br />
PROCESSES<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
• Provider time<br />
• Support staff time<br />
• Consumables<br />
• Capital (facilities,<br />
vehicles)<br />
Delivery System<br />
•cl<strong>in</strong>ic<br />
•commun -based<br />
organization<br />
•mobile services<br />
<strong>Service</strong>s provided thru:<br />
•cl<strong>in</strong>ic visits<br />
•community health<br />
workers<br />
•mobile outreach<br />
events<br />
• Higher contraceptive<br />
use<br />
• Fewer unplanned<br />
pregnancies<br />
Efficiency Cost-Effectiveness
LA/PM Decision Cascade<br />
Should extra<br />
effort be made to<br />
improve access<br />
to LA/PMs ?<br />
• Access,<br />
Equity<br />
How should<br />
LA/PMs be<br />
provided to rural<br />
populations?<br />
• Effectiveness,<br />
Cost-effectiveness<br />
How should<br />
mobile outreach<br />
services be<br />
configured?<br />
• Efficiency
Objectives of Cost Analysis<br />
To measure costs of ongo<strong>in</strong>g mobile service<br />
delivery<br />
– ATP-supported “family plann<strong>in</strong>g weeks”<br />
– ATP-supported outreach events<br />
– MST outreach expeditions<br />
To compute average cost per LA/PM acceptor<br />
(overall and by contraceptive method)<br />
To describe components of costs of mobile service<br />
delivery
Program Outputs<br />
Data Requirements<br />
– Acceptors of LA/PMs by outreach event and method<br />
Program Inputs<br />
– Staff (providers, supervisors, drivers)<br />
– Consumables (contraceptives, surgical supplies)<br />
– Lodg<strong>in</strong>g, perdiem and fuel<br />
– Capital (vehicles, facilities, equipment)<br />
– Zonal Office overhead<br />
Specification of process whereby <strong>in</strong>puts are transformed<br />
<strong>in</strong>to outputs
Methodology<br />
Retrospective, focus<strong>in</strong>g on 2010<br />
Perspective: programmatic (site level and zonal office)<br />
Unit of analysis: <strong>the</strong> outreach event or expedition<br />
Source of data: event narratives and associated expense<br />
reports<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g plan (aspirational):<br />
– ATP: one FP week and one outreach event, purposively selected<br />
for each prov<strong>in</strong>ce (n=24)<br />
– MST: 30 expeditions (six teams over five months)
Data Collection<br />
Ongo<strong>in</strong>g, us<strong>in</strong>g custom<br />
Excel spreadsheets to<br />
extract and organize<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on salaries,<br />
benefits, per-diems,<br />
contraceptives, medical<br />
supplies, fuel, vehicles,<br />
equipment and facilities
Data Analysis<br />
Total cost per event or expedition (<strong>in</strong>cludes site<br />
costs plus zonal office overhead)<br />
Cost per LA/PM acceptor, overall and by method
Challenges<br />
• Information not<br />
organized to enable<br />
simple extraction of<br />
costs of mobile<br />
outreach<br />
• Resources come from<br />
different entities, no<br />
central repository of<br />
cost <strong>in</strong>formation
Challenges, cont’<br />
• Uneven data quality (completeness, <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
consistency, legibility)<br />
• Complexity of MoH personnel classification<br />
system<br />
• Unclear how many different outreach models<br />
actually exist<br />
• Staff turnover
Next Steps<br />
ATP: Completion of data<br />
extraction for 12 events <strong>in</strong><br />
one zone; receipt of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on costs of<br />
supplies, vehicles and<br />
overhead<br />
MST: Receipt of<br />
categorized expenditure<br />
data for 30 outreach<br />
expeditions<br />
Analysis and report<strong>in</strong>g