here - The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

here - The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary here - The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

24.06.2014 Views

God’s word. For these unbelieving husbands to continue in disbelief and rebellion will be fatal to their souls. For many Christian women this is descriptive of their husband. Many women (and men) faithfully attend Christian worship, bring their children to church, and seek to faithfully follow God, but their spouse discourages them. Peter’s words should be an encouragement to these Christians that God can use their godly conduct in the life of their unbelieving mate. The term “behavior” (NASB) or “conduct” (ESV) (anastrophe) is one of Peter’s favorite. He uses it six times in this letter, while it is used only seven times in the rest of the New Testament. One final point should be made in regard to a wife’s submission to her husband. In most situations believers are to obey those whom God has placed over them (Rom 13:1–7; Eph 5:22–6:9; 1 Pet 2:13–3:6). However, in certain situations God’s people must refuse to submit if that submission would bring them into direct disobedience to the clear teachings of God’s word. This has been clearly illustrated in the Bible when the apostles refused to be silenced by the religious authorities concerning speaking the gospel (Acts 5:20). The same was true of Daniel when he refused to quit praying even though Darius outlawed prayer (Dan 6:1–28). A woman is not required to submit to her husband if what he asks her to do violates the clear teaching of the Bible. Peter’s second point is that this “wordless” evangelism is observed by the unbelieving spouse (3:2). Christian wives are to live a life toward their husbands that is “pure and respectful.” As he observes (epopteusantes) his wife’s conduct and reflects upon it, he can be led to conclude that the gospel is true. The two qualities in particular that catch the husband’s eye are his wife’s “pure” and “respectful” behavior. 7 The portrait painted here of the submissive wife is one that shows deference and respect toward her husband for God’s glory while keeping her husband’s eternity in view. Again, this “wordless evangelism” should not be taken to mean that a wife never shares her faith with her husband. It does not mean that she never invites him to attend church with her. But it does realize that one’s godly character is a means by which God softens the heart of an unregenerate husband. Peter’s third point is that Christian wives should not be consumed with their outward adornment but instead should focus on the cultivation of Christian character (3:3–4). Peter is not saying that she is to have no concern for her appearance, but that the cultivation of inner beauty is more important than overemphasizing external beauty. The art of the first two centuries testify to the preoccupation with hairstyles, make-up, and jewelry in the ancient world. Peter, however, draws a sharp distinction between outward and inward beauty. This verse has been read by some as a prohibition against make-up, jewelry, and similar kinds of outward ornamentation. These restrictions, however, miss the point. Instead, Peter’s words are intended to be a caution against a distorted sense of values. The primary thought is that a Christian wife will not win her husband to Christ by a superficial approach to life, but by the development of godly character. True beauty is that which is expressed in Christlike character (3:4a). The “hidden person of the heart” refers to the center of one’s character. This inner beauty, which is “imperishable,” consists of a “quiet and gentle” disposition that is “precious in God’s sight” (3:4b). The word “spirit” refers to her disposition, much like what we mean when we say, “he has a ‘good’ spirit about him.” The term “gentle” describes the wife as considerate and humble in her actions toward others, especially her husband. The term “quiet” denotes a calmness and tranquility, a spirit not easily ruffled. This kind of life can only be truly lived when a woman has given herself fully to God. Consequently, what is precious to God and attractive to an unbelieving husband is not a domineering personality, but a gentle and kind disposition. Fourth, Peter appeals to the example of godly women of the past to reinforce his point (3:5–6). He highlights three thoughts about them (3:5). First, they were “holy;” that is, they were called by God and set apart for Him (cf. 1:14–15). They lived holy lives in the most difficult of situations—not in isolation from various troubles, but in interaction with their unbelieving spouse. Second, these women “hoped” in God. They lived their daily lives with the expectancy that God would accomplish what he had promised (1:3, 21; 3:15). This hope enabled them to be submissive 16

to their husbands under trying and disappointing circumstances. Third, they “adorned themselves” with the character trait of “submission.” With another reference to submission, Peter returns to the primary theme of his paragraph. Sarah is highlighted as an example of this kind of submissive attitude (3:6a). The reference that she called Abraham “lord” (kyrios) is likely an allusion to Genesis 18:12. What is interesting in this passage is that Sarah is referring to Abraham in an off-handed comment, suggesting that even at this stage of their lives she still showed him deference and respect. 8 This is astounding considering the serious mistakes Abraham had made in their marriage. The word translated “obey” carries the thought of listening to someone and then carrying out their instructions. In this passage “obey” refers to Sarah’s deference to Abraham. Christian wives who follow her example are her spiritual children. Two qualities further delineate those who are Sarah’s spiritual children. First, they “do what is right”; that is, they do what is right in the Lord’s eyes as they interact with their husbands. Second, they are not to be afraid (“without being frightened by any fear”). They are not to be afraid of doing what God has called them to do in relationship to their husbands. While Peter does not spend much time on the obligation of the Christian husband to his believing wife, he does address the subject briefly (3:7). Peter places two responsibilities on the husband followed by a statement designed to encourage his obedience. Husbands are to live with their wives in an “understanding way.” The thought is that the husband is to live with his wife in a way that takes into consideration her needs and desires. He should ever seek to learn more and more about his wife. The word “weaker” should be understood that the woman is weaker in a physical sense. Furthermore husbands are to grant their wives honor (3:7b). This is likely one way that a husband lives with his wife in an understanding way. It is to treat one’s wife with respect. The reason for treating her in this way is that she is a “fellow heir” of the grace of life. She is a sister in Christ. Peter gives an incentive for a husband to care for his wife in this manner (3:7c). If they do not treat their wives in this way their prayers will be affected. For one’s prayers to be hindered is to have them “cut off ” from God. Peter could not have put it more directly. If a Christian husband does not treat his wife in a godly manner his prayers will go unanswered. While it is likely that Peter was writing mostly to married persons with Christian spouses, it was not true of all. Peter’s intention is to give wise council to those women in particular that lived with unbelieving husbands. He sought to encourage them, give them hope, and a plan of “attack” in evangelizing their spouse. Thus, while living out the gospel they were to demonstrate themselves as an “alien” people passing through and on the way to their eternal home. IS DIVORCE AN OPTION? (1 CORINTHIANS 7:12–16) Many Christian women may have labored for years caring for a godless and ungrateful husband who takes advantage of their godly disposition. Some wonder if they may not be better off single, especially if they have children that are adversely affected by a lost husband. Paul deals with this situation in 1 Corinthians 7:12–16. In these verses Paul handles the issue of the permissibility of divorce in the case where one partner is a believer and the other an unbeliever. It may be helpful to set this passage within its larger context in 1 Corinthians. The preceding portion of this epistle has dealt with matters brought to Paul’s attention by “Chloe’s people” (1:10–6:20). Beginning in chapter 7 the discussion takes a new direction. The reference to “the matters you wrote about” suggests that Paul is responding to questions and issues addressed to him in a letter from Corinth (7:1). The reoccurring phrase, “now concerning” (peri de), is used by the apostle to introduce the various topics mentioned in their letter to him: marriage and divorce (7:1), fathers giving their virgin daughters in marriage (7:25), food offered to idols (8:1), spiritual gifts (12:1), and the collection of the Jerusalem offering (16:1). Paul is dealing systematically with a series of issues over which the Corinthians were struggling. Chapter 7 relates to a cluster of questions, having to do in some way with marriage. When we study this passage we must not separate it from the occasional nature of its context. Paul is not writing a general treatise on 17

God’s word. For these unbelieving husbands to continue<br />

in disbelief and rebellion will be fatal to their souls.<br />

For many Christian women this is descriptive of<br />

their husband. Many women (and men) faithfully<br />

attend Christian worship, bring their children to<br />

church, and seek to faithfully follow God, but their<br />

spouse discourages them. Peter’s words should be an<br />

encouragement to these Christians that God can use<br />

their godly conduct in the life of their unbelieving<br />

mate. <strong>The</strong> term “behavior” (NASB) or “conduct” (ESV)<br />

(anastrophe) is one of Peter’s favorite. He uses it six<br />

times in this letter, while it is used only seven times in<br />

the rest of the New Testament. One final point should<br />

be made in regard to a wife’s submission to her husband.<br />

In most situations believers are to obey those whom<br />

God has placed over them (Rom 13:1–7; Eph 5:22–6:9;<br />

1 Pet 2:13–3:6). However, in certain situations God’s<br />

people must refuse to submit if that submission would<br />

bring them into direct disobedience to the clear teachings<br />

of God’s word. This has been clearly illustrated in<br />

the Bible when the apostles refused to be silenced by<br />

the religious authorities concerning speaking the gospel<br />

(Acts 5:20). <strong>The</strong> same was true of Daniel when he<br />

refused to quit praying even though Darius outlawed<br />

prayer (Dan 6:1–28). A woman is not required to submit<br />

to her husband if what he asks her to do violates the<br />

clear teaching of the Bible.<br />

Peter’s second point is that this “wordless” evangelism<br />

is observed by the unbelieving spouse (3:2). Christian<br />

wives are to live a life toward their husbands that<br />

is “pure and respectful.” As he observes (epopteusantes)<br />

his wife’s conduct and reflects upon it, he can be led<br />

to conclude that the gospel is true. <strong>The</strong> two qualities<br />

in particular that catch the husband’s eye are his wife’s<br />

“pure” and “respectful” behavior. 7 <strong>The</strong> portrait painted<br />

<strong>here</strong> of the submissive wife is one that shows deference<br />

and respect toward her husband for God’s glory while<br />

keeping her husband’s eternity in view. Again, this<br />

“wordless evangelism” should not be taken to mean that<br />

a wife never shares her faith with her husband. It does<br />

not mean that she never invites him to attend church<br />

with her. But it does realize that one’s godly character is<br />

a means by which God softens the heart of an unregenerate<br />

husband.<br />

Peter’s third point is that Christian wives should not<br />

be consumed with their outward adornment but instead<br />

should focus on the cultivation of Christian character<br />

(3:3–4). Peter is not saying that she is to have no concern<br />

for her appearance, but that the cultivation of inner<br />

beauty is more important than overemphasizing external<br />

beauty. <strong>The</strong> art of the first two centuries testify to<br />

the preoccupation with hairstyles, make-up, and jewelry<br />

in the ancient world. Peter, however, draws a sharp distinction<br />

between outward and inward beauty. This verse<br />

has been read by some as a prohibition against make-up,<br />

jewelry, and similar kinds of outward ornamentation.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se restrictions, however, miss the point. Instead,<br />

Peter’s words are intended to be a caution against a distorted<br />

sense of values. <strong>The</strong> primary thought is that a<br />

Christian wife will not win her husband to Christ by a<br />

superficial approach to life, but by the development of<br />

godly character. True beauty is that which is expressed in<br />

Christlike character (3:4a).<br />

<strong>The</strong> “hidden person of the heart” refers to the center<br />

of one’s character. This inner beauty, which is “imperishable,”<br />

consists of a “quiet and gentle” disposition that is<br />

“precious in God’s sight” (3:4b). <strong>The</strong> word “spirit” refers<br />

to her disposition, much like what we mean when we<br />

say, “he has a ‘good’ spirit about him.” <strong>The</strong> term “gentle”<br />

describes the wife as considerate and humble in her<br />

actions toward others, especially her husband. <strong>The</strong> term<br />

“quiet” denotes a calmness and tranquility, a spirit not<br />

easily ruffled. This kind of life can only be truly lived<br />

when a woman has given herself fully to God. Consequently,<br />

what is precious to God and attractive to an<br />

unbelieving husband is not a domineering personality,<br />

but a gentle and kind disposition.<br />

Fourth, Peter appeals to the example of godly<br />

women of the past to reinforce his point (3:5–6). He<br />

highlights three thoughts about them (3:5). First, they<br />

were “holy;” that is, they were called by God and set<br />

apart for Him (cf. 1:14–15). <strong>The</strong>y lived holy lives in<br />

the most difficult of situations—not in isolation from<br />

various troubles, but in interaction with their unbelieving<br />

spouse. Second, these women “hoped” in God.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y lived their daily lives with the expectancy that<br />

God would accomplish what he had promised (1:3,<br />

21; 3:15). This hope enabled them to be submissive<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!