24.06.2014 Views

A Critique of the Mormon Doctrine of Creation

A Critique of the Mormon Doctrine of Creation

A Critique of the Mormon Doctrine of Creation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ville: Broadman and Holman, 1995),<br />

128; also W. H. Schmidt, “br’, to create,”<br />

1:256; and William P. Brown,<br />

“<strong>Creation</strong>,” in Eerdmans Dictionary<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible, ed. David Noel Freedman<br />

(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,<br />

2000), 293.<br />

119 Paul J. Achtemeier, Romans (Interpretation;<br />

Atlanta: John Knox, 1985),<br />

82.<br />

120 Ernst Käsemann, Commentary on<br />

Romans (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,<br />

1980), 123.<br />

121 Ibid.<br />

122 Bernhard W. Anderson, “<strong>Creation</strong>,”<br />

Interpreter’s Dictionary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Bible (4 vols.; Nashville: Abingdon,<br />

1962), 1:728.<br />

123 Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Romans (Anchor<br />

Bible 33; New York: Doubleday,<br />

1993), 383.<br />

124 Jaroslav Pelikan, “<strong>Creation</strong> and<br />

Causality in <strong>the</strong> History <strong>of</strong> Christian<br />

Thought,” in Evolution After<br />

Darwin, ed. Sol Tax and Charles Callender,<br />

(3 vols.; Chicago: University<br />

Press, 1960), 34.<br />

125 Craig Koester, Hebrews (Anchor<br />

Bible 36; New York: Doubleday,<br />

2001), 99-100. The preposition ek/ex,<br />

which can mean “out <strong>of</strong>,” can also be<br />

translated causally, as it parallels “by<br />

<strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> God.” The sense would<br />

<strong>the</strong>n be that <strong>the</strong> visible comes into<br />

existence by <strong>the</strong> invisible (Ibid., 474).<br />

As an aside, one could argue that<br />

even on view (2), creatio ex nihilo is<br />

hardly excluded since it is possible<br />

to speak <strong>of</strong> God’s bringing about<br />

<strong>the</strong> world out <strong>of</strong> nothing material<br />

(after all, He created all things,<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r visible or invisible); He simply<br />

speaks, and a cosmos—ordered<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> Ideas or Forms in<br />

<strong>the</strong> divine Mind—is brought into<br />

being.<br />

126 William L. Lane, Hebrews 9-13<br />

(Word Biblical Commentary 47B;<br />

Dallas: Word, 1991), 326-27; see also<br />

Ronald Williamson, Philo and <strong>the</strong><br />

Epistle to <strong>the</strong> Hebrews (Leiden: Brill,<br />

1970), 377-9; and Philip Edgecumbe<br />

Hughes, The Epistle to <strong>the</strong> Hebrews<br />

(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977),<br />

443.<br />

127 Lane, Hebrews 9-13, 326-27. See also<br />

Hughes, Hebrews, 443.<br />

128 See Maxmilian Zerwick, Biblical<br />

Greek (Rome: Pontifical Institute,<br />

1963), § 352, 122.<br />

129 Lane, Hebrews 9-13, 332.<br />

130 Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to <strong>the</strong><br />

Romans (New International Greek<br />

Testament Commentary; Grand<br />

Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996), 743.<br />

131 Mounce, Romans, 227.<br />

132 Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans<br />

(Baker Exegetical Commentary on<br />

<strong>the</strong> New Testament; Grand Rapids:<br />

Baker, 1998), 637.<br />

133 Dunn, Theology <strong>of</strong> Paul <strong>the</strong> Apostle,<br />

268; Richard Bauckham, God Crucified,<br />

38. Bauckham notes that what<br />

Paul does is reproduce <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

statement about Yahweh and make <strong>the</strong>m<br />

apply to both <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r and Christ.<br />

Paul is thus including Jesus in <strong>the</strong><br />

divine identity, redefining mono<strong>the</strong>ism<br />

as christological mono<strong>the</strong>ism.<br />

134 F. F. Bruce, I & II Corinthians (New<br />

Century Bible; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,<br />

1971), 80.<br />

135 Dunn, Theology <strong>of</strong> Paul <strong>the</strong> Apostle,<br />

267.<br />

136 Walter Bauer, A Greek-English<br />

Lexicon <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament and<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Early Christian Literature, ed.<br />

Frederick W. Danker (2 nd ed.; Chicago:<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press,<br />

1979), 456.<br />

137 Walter Bauer, A Greek-English<br />

Lexicon <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament and<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Early Christian Literature, ed.<br />

Frederick W. Danker, (3 rd ed.; Chicago:<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press,<br />

2000), 572.<br />

138 Corresponds, that is, in chiastic<br />

fashion.<br />

139 P. T. O’Brien, Colossians, Philemon<br />

(Word Biblical Commentary 44;<br />

Waco, TX: Word, 1982), 46.<br />

140 Barth and Blanke, Colossians, 200.<br />

O’Brien sees <strong>the</strong>se invisible things<br />

(“thrones, dominions, etc.) as hostile<br />

angelic powers (Colossians, Philemon<br />

46). On such a view, if we see <strong>the</strong><br />

things “unseen” as referring to<br />

thrones and dominions and principalities<br />

and powers, <strong>the</strong>y still find<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir source and temporal origination<br />

in Christ.<br />

141 Barth and Blanke, Colossians, 199.<br />

142 Ibid.<br />

143 Jürgen Moltmann, God in <strong>Creation</strong>:<br />

A New <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Creation</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit <strong>of</strong> God (Minneapolis: Fortress,<br />

1985), 74.<br />

144 Stephen Ricks, “Ancient Views,”<br />

328.<br />

145 Richard J. Bauckham, Jude, 2 Peter<br />

(Word Biblical Commentary; Waco,<br />

TX: Word, 1983), 297.<br />

146 Thomas Schreiner, 1 and 2 Peter,<br />

Jude (New American Commentary<br />

37; Nashville: Broadman & Holman,<br />

2003), 374.<br />

147 Ibid.<br />

148 Douglas J. Moo, 2 Peter, Jude (NIV<br />

Application Commentary; Grand<br />

Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), 170.<br />

149 C. F. D. Moule, Idiom Book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New<br />

Testament Greek (2 nd ed.; Cambridge:<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!