24.06.2014 Views

A Critique of the Mormon Doctrine of Creation

A Critique of the Mormon Doctrine of Creation

A Critique of the Mormon Doctrine of Creation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is true; <strong>the</strong> matter is not ambiguous. Or<br />

consider this: “Ei<strong>the</strong>r creatio ex nihilo is<br />

true, or God is not all-powerful. But God<br />

is truly all-powerful.” Again, God’s being<br />

all-powerful strongly suggests creation<br />

out <strong>of</strong> nothing. Though it is implicit in<br />

Scripture, it is not ambiguous.<br />

Fourth, even if <strong>the</strong> biblical evidence<br />

were ambiguous and <strong>the</strong> biblical writers<br />

took no position on this issue, <strong>the</strong> LDS<br />

idea that God created from eternally<br />

pre-existing matter does not win by<br />

default. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, this position has its own<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> to bear. <strong>Mormon</strong>s give<br />

<strong>the</strong> impression that an ei<strong>the</strong>r-or situation<br />

exists regarding creation: ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Bible<br />

explicitly teaches creation out <strong>of</strong> nothing<br />

or <strong>the</strong> creation ex materia view is true by<br />

default. However, one must deal contextually<br />

and exegetically with <strong>the</strong> biblical<br />

texts, <strong>of</strong>fering positive evidence for <strong>the</strong><br />

ex materia position. The idea <strong>of</strong> creation<br />

from pre-existent matter would not automatically<br />

be true, even if <strong>the</strong> Bible were<br />

actually unclear on <strong>the</strong> matter.<br />

Happily, we have no need <strong>of</strong> that<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis.<br />

ENDNOTES<br />

1 “<strong>Creation</strong>, <strong>Creation</strong> Accounts,” in Encyclopedia<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Mormon</strong>ism, ed. Daniel H.<br />

Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992),<br />

1:340.<br />

2 B. H. Roberts, The Truth, <strong>the</strong> Way, <strong>the</strong> Life,<br />

ed. Stan Larson (San Francisco: Smith<br />

Research Associates, 1994), 224.<br />

3 See Stephen E. Robinson’s comments on<br />

this in Stephen E. Robinson and Craig<br />

L. Blomberg, How Wide <strong>the</strong> Divide? A<br />

<strong>Mormon</strong> and an Evangelical in Conversation<br />

(Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press,<br />

1997), 138.<br />

4 Stephen D. Ricks, “Ancient Views <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Creation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Creation</strong><br />

ex Nihilo,” in Revelation, Reason, and Faith:<br />

Essays in Honor <strong>of</strong> Truman G. Madsen, ed.<br />

Donald W. Parry, Daniel C. Peterson,<br />

and Stephen D. Ricks (Provo: FARMS,<br />

2002), 332.<br />

5 Ibid.<br />

6 Coauthored with William Lane Craig<br />

(Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004). See also our<br />

coauthored essay, “Craftsman or Creator?”<br />

in The New <strong>Mormon</strong> Challenge, ed.<br />

Francis Beckwith, Carl Mosser, and Paul<br />

Owen (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2002),<br />

95-152; and Paul Copan, “Is <strong>Creation</strong> ex<br />

Nihilo a Post-biblical Invention?” Trinity<br />

Journal NS 17 (1996): 77-93.<br />

7 Incidentally, I have met and have had<br />

very cordial interactions with Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Ricks; I trust that Ricks will engage <strong>the</strong><br />

ideas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book—and perhaps even<br />

concede to overstatement!<br />

8 For details regarding <strong>the</strong> biblical, extrabiblical,<br />

philosophical, and scientific<br />

support for creation ex nihilo, I refer readers<br />

to <strong>the</strong> book mentioned above.<br />

9 Joseph Smith, History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong><br />

Latter-day Saints, intro. and notes by B. H.<br />

Roberts (7 vols; Salt Lake City: Deseret<br />

Book, 1978), 6:308-309. The King Follett<br />

Discourse is found in <strong>the</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Discourses<br />

(JD), 6:1-11.<br />

10 JD, 13:248.<br />

11 “<strong>Creation</strong>, <strong>Creation</strong> Accounts,” Encyclopedia<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Mormon</strong>ism, 340.<br />

12 Lowell Bennion, “A <strong>Mormon</strong> View <strong>of</strong><br />

Life,” Dialogue 24, no. 3 (1991): 60.<br />

13 In a personal correspondence (20 April<br />

1998), Stephen Robinson writes, “I would<br />

not be comfortable with saying that God<br />

cannot bring eternal matter into being<br />

nor destroy it.” Ra<strong>the</strong>r, “God creates<br />

matter out <strong>of</strong> chaos and can return it to<br />

chaos, and that chaos is not matter as<br />

we know it, but a level <strong>of</strong> existence that<br />

human beings cannot comprehend. For<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!