23.06.2014 Views

Supporting Documents (Data and Analysis) - Satellite Beach

Supporting Documents (Data and Analysis) - Satellite Beach

Supporting Documents (Data and Analysis) - Satellite Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION<br />

Future traffic conditions including traffic volumes on the roadway network in <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> have<br />

been projected for the years 2009 <strong>and</strong> 2019. Future roadway network needs have been identified as a<br />

result of projected future traffic volumes.<br />

Future traffic volumes were developed based on the Future L<strong>and</strong> Use Map, proposed developments,<br />

population projections, tourist traffic <strong>and</strong> historic growth.<br />

A review of the proposed <strong>and</strong> funded capacity or improvement projects by the Space Coast<br />

Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Major Transportation Improvement Projects FY 2008-<br />

2012 indicated corridor improvements were funded for a 3.15 mile stretch of S.R. 513 (South Patrick<br />

Drive) from DeSoto Parkway to S.R. 404 (Pineda Causeway). Right-of-way acquisition occurred in<br />

2008 <strong>and</strong> construction was to have been completed by 2009. However, these improvements have<br />

been removed from the list of short-term improvements <strong>and</strong> postponed indefinitely. With these<br />

improvements to S.R. 513, the over-capacity road’s level of service would have been improved<br />

significantly from D to B, meeting both the City <strong>and</strong> State st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

By 2010 another segment of FDOT roadway (S.R. AIA) will have exceeded capacity using City<br />

roadway level of services st<strong>and</strong>ards. However, by FDOT st<strong>and</strong>ards it has not. Because the City has<br />

no control or authorization of these particular road segments <strong>and</strong> could continually fall into the<br />

concurrency trap, for which they have no recourse. Based on the above, the City will recommend in<br />

the EAR-based Amendment phase to drop the LOS for State-controlled Arterials to “D”.<br />

Other transportation planning documents such as the Brevard 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan<br />

indicates no need or planning for any improvements within <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Beach</strong>. Therefore, the Level of<br />

Service appears not to be a critical issue at this time, nor is it anticipated to become one in the near<br />

future. Based on these County transportation reports <strong>and</strong> the projected LOS, an in depth<br />

transportation analysis is not warranted at this time. All other roads are considered "local", have no<br />

LOS problems, <strong>and</strong> are maintained by the City. Because the City is almost completely built out, its<br />

local streets cannot be expected to exceed LOS C in 2015. Based on this analysis, the transportation<br />

needs of <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> do not warrant the creation of a multi-modal transportation system.<br />

Pursuant to Section 163.3 180(10), Florida Statutes, each local government shall use a professionally<br />

accepted methodology for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purposes of<br />

implementing its concurrency management system. The methodology used by each jurisdiction for<br />

measuring transportation impacts should include the following components:<br />

• Adopted level of service st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

• Traffic study area requirements<br />

• Background traffic assumptions<br />

• Trip generation data <strong>and</strong> trip distribution requirements<br />

• Impact analysis based on peak hour trips<br />

Transportation Element<br />

<strong>Data</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> 2-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!