23.06.2014 Views

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Internet – Newspaper Archives Searches<br />

Hildebrandt, Konrad<br />

(Articles are in reverse chronological order)<br />

TAB 6<br />

Daily Herald (Provo, UT)<br />

October 17, 2010<br />

Watchdog: Cedar Hills 'hides' golf subsidy<br />

Author: Caleb Warnock - Daily Herald<br />

In Cedar Hills budget documents, a golf bailout is called "revenue."<br />

Taxpayer watchdogs say the city is heavily involved in a game of hide-the-subsidy, while<br />

companies trying to run local golf courses as businesses decry the unfair competition.<br />

In a recent Daily Herald investigation of how much cities are spending to subsidize golf, Cedar<br />

Hills was the only city that did not respond to a government records access request. In follow-up<br />

requests, the Daily Herald was referred to a state budget filing, as well as a copy of the budget on<br />

the city's website. The two documents tell different stories about the same golf course.<br />

In an interview via e-mail, city manager Konrad Hildebrandt said the golf course "is projected<br />

to be in the red roughly $6,490" at the end of the fiscal year.<br />

But according to city documents, counting the shortfall as $7,000 is only possible if the city<br />

counts the taxpayer expense of $1.2 million in loans as income rather than expense, the taxpayer<br />

expense of $380,000 per year for the land payment as income rather than expense, and remove<br />

the cost of depreciation or replacing equipment over time. Depreciation cost the city $256,000.<br />

All told, Cedar Hills golf is "in the red roughly $6,490" only if the taxpayer's bill of $1,836,000<br />

goes uncounted -- an amount three times larger than the money the course takes in greens fees.<br />

"I think you would agree that the CH golf course is trending to be a great, positive and totally<br />

non-subsidized course," Hildebrandt has said. "Every year our financials improve."<br />

"It really doesn't come as a great surprise to the Taxpayers Association that cities want to hide<br />

the performance of their golf courses," said Royce Van Tassell, of the Utah Taxpayers<br />

Association. "They are inevitably drains on taxpayer dollars, and cities don't like to acknowledge<br />

as much. It is unfortunate that Cedar Hills is playing hide the ball, and it is yet another sign of<br />

why Cedar Hills and every city in Utah needs to get out of the golf business. Taxpayers don't<br />

need to subsidize golf."<br />

Cedar Hills and other cities have said spending millions on golf is no different than spending<br />

money on parks or recreation. But while t<strong>here</strong> are no businesses trying to run local parks, t<strong>here</strong><br />

are companies struggling to make a profit on golf while cities essentially undercut their business<br />

with courses being subsidized with millions of taxpayer dollars.<br />

Billy Casper Golf, the largest municipal golf course management company in the U.S., recently<br />

sent two officials to testify before the Utah privatization policy board about how cities are<br />

Page 38 of 62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!