23.06.2014 Views

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Internet – Newspaper Archives Searches<br />

John “Jack” Helin<br />

(Articles are in reverse chronological order)<br />

TAB 5<br />

Helin wrote in his report that Basehor was not required to have its comprehensive plan "mimic"<br />

that of Leavenworth County, as Garcia and Slaugh believed. "We told them that none of the<br />

three counties we are in (Leavenworth, Wyandotte and Johnson) had anything to do with the<br />

creation or approval of our comp plan - but apparently we were unconvincing."<br />

Also, Helin said, Garcia and Slaugh stated that Basehor had informal agreements with Lansing<br />

and Tonganoxie for future growth boundaries and that it was possible to have such agreements<br />

with those cities because they're in Leavenworth County and Bonner Springs is in Wyandotte<br />

County. The fact that Bonner is partly in Leavenworth County did not convince them, Helin said.<br />

Helin said Kansas statute 12-2901 empowers local municipalities to make interlocal agreements.<br />

The statute states it permits "local governmental units to make the most efficient use of their<br />

powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities, persons, associations and<br />

corporations on a basis of mutual advantage and t<strong>here</strong>by to provide services and facilities in a<br />

manner and pursuant to forms of governmental organization that will accord best with<br />

geographic, economic, population and other factors influencing the needs and development of<br />

local communities." "We're just trying to identify future growth areas," Helin said. "It really<br />

only kind of impacts future planning for future infrastructure : You don't want to lay a water line<br />

on one side of the road and then have the other guy lay one on the other side."<br />

County backs Basehor<br />

Chris Dunn, director of planning for Leavenworth County, backed up Garcia and Slaugh's<br />

position. "The county is the one that sets the comprehensive-use plan," he said Tuesday, "as long<br />

as it's rural." Furthermore, though he couldn't give a legal opinion, Dunn said, "I don't think<br />

Basehor can give away responsibility for areas under our jurisdiction."<br />

Dunn said the county spent a year in the process of devising its comprehensive plan and taking<br />

public input on it, and if Bonner Springs city officials had a problem with the plan "they sure<br />

forgot to tell the county about it." The comprehensive plan for Leavenworth shows Basehor's<br />

growth area stretching just south of Kansas Highway 32 west of 142nd Street.<br />

Bonner frustrations<br />

"We were never invited to participate in their process," Helin said. "That's some of our<br />

frustration: We're in Leavenworth County and we're treated like we don't exist."<br />

Although Bonner's footprint in the county constitutes a small portion of it and the town is mostly<br />

outside the county, "we should be treated like any other" town in it, Helin said. "I can tell you<br />

Johnson County treated us" like its other cities, and invited Bonner to participate in its future<br />

growth planning, despite the fact that the only part of Bonner Springs that is in Johnson County<br />

is the industrial park east of Kansas Highway 7, just north of Shawnee.<br />

On the ultimate consequences of Basehor's refusal to settle on an informal agreement for each<br />

town's future growth boundary, Helin said, "it just sort of leaves it (future planning for the area)<br />

Page 53 of 90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!