23.06.2014 Views

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Internet – Newspaper Archives Searches<br />

John “Jack” Helin<br />

(Articles are in reverse chronological order)<br />

TAB 5<br />

The Chieftain (Bonner Springs, KS), April 30, 2009<br />

Council to Voice Opinions in Letter Form By Melissa Treolo<br />

Bonner Springs City Council members, along with city manager John “Jack” Helin, are taking<br />

their issues with the Kansas Department of Transportation to paper. The issues surround<br />

KDOT’s latest design for the yet-to-be-funded Kansas Highway 7 and Interstate 70 project,<br />

which would create a tri-fold system of interchanges at 130th Street, I-70 and Kansas Avenue<br />

along K-7. “My belief is that we should provide some kind of written response to their latest<br />

plan,” Helin told council members in a work session before Monday’s council meeting. The<br />

written response would be in the form of a letter outlining several problems the council sees with<br />

the project – the overriding problem being that it would take away developable land the council<br />

believes Bonner Springs can’t afford to lose.<br />

Despite signing a memorandum of understanding in April 2007 acknowledging their support of<br />

and agreement with the project, Helin said members of the council only signed the document as<br />

a safeguard against not having a chance to voice their opinions when the need arose. “We<br />

reluctantly agreed to sign that agreement because we felt it was better to be at the table than not<br />

invited when conversations took place,” Helin said.<br />

Some issues the letter would contain include:<br />

• The closing of 134th Street, which is a strong possibility under the current project design.<br />

• One of the interchanges of the tri-fold system, at K-7 and I-70, which council member Jeff<br />

Harrington said was too large and would take up land the city has been trying to fill with new<br />

development.<br />

• Other project design possibilities, which members of the council said they had never seen<br />

during the course of the project. Many questions were raised at the work session about what<br />

other designs were looked at, such as those including the more expensive options of retaining<br />

walls and flyovers the council believed would be worth it in the long run because these builds<br />

would take up less developable land.<br />

As it still awaits funding, construction on the interchange project may not begin for quite some<br />

time, but Helin said t<strong>here</strong>in lay another problem. Even if the city tried to bring in more<br />

businesses in the interim between now and the start date, it would have a hard time finding<br />

interested developers. “We’re obligated to tell any (prospective developers) that this is a<br />

possibility,” Helin said.<br />

Helin insisted, while the current project design wasn’t one the council was happy with, KDOT<br />

had tried to accommodate and work with the city as much as it could. He said the letter might be<br />

an effective way to make KDOT see the council’s position and change the design accordingly.<br />

Page 49 of 90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!