23.06.2014 Views

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

here - Satellite Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Internet – Newspaper Archives Searches<br />

John “Jack” Helin<br />

(Articles are in reverse chronological order)<br />

TAB 5<br />

The Chieftain (Bonner Springs, KS)<br />

October 12, 2012<br />

Bonner to Ask State for Changes in K-7 Plan<br />

Author: Caroline Boyer<br />

The Bonner Springs City Council has decided completely abandoning support of the state’s<br />

freeway plans for Kansas Highway 7 may not be the best option after all. But the council agreed<br />

that it would ask for several conditions to be met before the Kansas Department of<br />

Transportation moves forward with construction of an interchange at Kansas Avenue or 130th<br />

Street.<br />

Since the city of Olathe last spring terminated its memorandum of understanding with the state<br />

concerning K-7, stating some of the same concerns the city of Bonner Springs has long had,<br />

Bonner officials have questioned what they should do regarding the highway’s future. In a<br />

workshop prior to its regular meeting Monday, the council and John “Jack” Helin, city<br />

manager, covered a proposed resolution to amend the city’s K-7 memorandum of understanding.<br />

“I think it would be best to approach them this way… Rather than be Olathe and just pull out,<br />

that we stay at the table with them, that we identify some key things that are important to us, and<br />

pass a resolution that says that,” Helin said. Helin said the city should try to work with KDOT<br />

by establishing dates and other triggers that would require the construction of interchanges,<br />

because stating that K-7 should maintain at-grade intersections may prove shortsighted in 30<br />

years or more. He didn’t want the city to get in trouble if it attracted a development that<br />

supported the need for an interchange. “It may get to the point w<strong>here</strong> all the sudden, people are<br />

sitting <strong>here</strong> in this room 10 years out and going, ‘We really need this,’” he said.<br />

However, Helin said city officials don’t believe traffic will increase at the rate the state is<br />

predicting, with traffic counts based on full build-out projections provided by each city along the<br />

highway. In fact, he said, the state’s traffic counts have shown a reduction in daily traffic on the<br />

highway in recent years. “Don’t use these wildly optimistic figures and stick them in your<br />

computer program,” Helin said. “ … That’s great, but that’s assuming total build-out in the area,<br />

and that’s not going to happen.”<br />

So, the resolution restates the city’s numerous concerns, chiefly that the freeway option could<br />

hurt the city’s economy because all of its major sales-tax-generating businesses are located on<br />

the highway, and the uncertainty surrounding the state’s plans hurts the city’s ability to attract<br />

other developments.<br />

It suggests that the city work with the state to:<br />

• determine a “no earlier than” date before work would begin on interchanges beyond the I-70<br />

interchange,<br />

• determine actual traffic counts that would be reached before any interchange is constructed,<br />

Page 27 of 90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!