23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In re Interest of Lakota Z. & Jacob H., 282 Neb. 584, 804 N.W.2d 174 (2011)<br />

In guardianship termination proceedings involving a biological or adoptive parent,<br />

the parental preference principle serves to establish a rebuttable presumption that<br />

the best interests of a child are served by reuniting the child with his or her parent.<br />

An individual who opposes the termination of a guardianship bears the burden of<br />

proving by clear and convincing evidence that the biological or adoptive parent either<br />

is unfit or has forfeited his or her right to custody. Absent such proof, the<br />

constitutional dimensions of the relationship between parent and child require<br />

termination of the guardianship and reunification with the parent.<br />

Uhing v. Uhing, 241 Neb. 368, 488 N.W.2d 366 (1992)<br />

In a parent’s habeas corpus proceeding directed at child custody, a court may not<br />

deprive a parent of a minor’s custody unless it is affirmatively shown that the parent<br />

seeking habeas corpus relief is unfit to perform the parental duties imposed by the<br />

parent-child relationship or has legally lost parental rights in the child.<br />

Guidelines Issues<br />

(Including sufficient and insufficient reasons for deviating from the guidelines —<br />

See also Modification Issues)<br />

Note: Minor tweaking of the <strong>Nebraska</strong>’s child support guidelines took effect Sept. 1,<br />

2011. View Amendments<br />

Among the largest changes are:<br />

a change to Worksheet #1, adding cash medical support as a factor that adjusts<br />

a final child support award, much as the cost of dependent health insurance<br />

does;<br />

Birth related medical expenses remain uncollectable. “Health insurance” is now<br />

defined to include coverage for medical, dental, orthodontic, optometric, substance<br />

abuse, and mental health treatment;<br />

If a court orders a parent to pay cash medical support, it shall be in lieu of, and not<br />

in addition to, requiring the parent to also pay reimbursement for reasonable and<br />

necessary children’s health care costs;<br />

If the child is residing with a third party, the court shall order each of the parents to<br />

pay to the third party their respective amounts of child support as determined by the<br />

worksheet.<br />

View <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines Worksheets and Income Shares Table<br />

§42-364.16 <strong>Child</strong> support guidelines; establishment; use.<br />

The Supreme Court shall provide by court rule, as a rebuttable presumption, guidelines for the<br />

establishment of all child support obligations. <strong>Child</strong> support shall be established in accordance<br />

with such guidelines, which guidelines are presumed to be in the best interests of the child,<br />

unless the court finds that one or both parties have produced sufficient evidence to rebut the<br />

presumption that the application of the guidelines will result in a fair and equitable child support<br />

order.<br />

Source: Laws 1985, Second Spec. Sess., LB 7, § 18; Laws 1994, LB 1224, § 46.<br />

- 81 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!