23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1412.01 (Reissue 2008) gives the court discretion to determine<br />

whether disestablishment of paternity is appropriate in light of both the adjudicated<br />

father’s interests and the best interests of the child.<br />

[I]t is hard to imagine, as a practical matter, a circumstance after 2008 in which an<br />

out-of-wedlock child’s paternity would be established by means other than notarized<br />

acknowledgment or genetic testing.<br />

[G]enetic testing can now relieve presumed fathers of their traditional support<br />

bligetions, while at the same time imposing support obligations on men who<br />

engaged in out-of-wedlock relations which resulted in the child’s conception.<br />

While the presumption of paternity has not changed, its role in protecting children<br />

has become less vital with the advent of genetic testing and the shifting focus of the<br />

law from marital to biological ties.<br />

With changing societal values regarding illegitimacy and the advent of genetic<br />

testing, the marital presumption has become less important as a tool for ensuring a<br />

child’s support by both parents, and the legal environment has become more<br />

concerned with biological ties to fatherhood.<br />

While (§ 43-1412.01) fails to precisely detail what circumstances should be<br />

considered in weighing the interests of the parties, we believe it would be appropriate<br />

for the court to consider the child’s age, the length of time since the<br />

establishment of paternity, the previous relationship between the child and the<br />

established father, and the possibility that the child could benefit from establishing<br />

the child’s actual paternity.<br />

State ex rel. Storz v. Storz, 235 Neb. 368, 455 N.W.2d 182 (1990)<br />

Nemec v. Nemec, 219 Neb. 891, 367 N.W.2d 705 (1985)<br />

full and complete general jurisdiction over the entire marital relationship and all<br />

related matters, including child custody and support, is vested in the district court in<br />

which a petition for dissolution of a marriage is properly filed<br />

Because the child was conceived while the father and mother were married [even<br />

though conception occurred several months following the signing of the divorce<br />

decree] and is the product of that marriage, custody and support issues respecting<br />

the child must be determined through a modification of the dissolution decree rather<br />

than through a paternity action.<br />

Domicile<br />

(See also : Removal of Minor <strong>Child</strong> from <strong>Nebraska</strong>)<br />

Clymer v. La Velle, 194 Neb. 91, 230 N.W.2d 213 (1975)<br />

Palagi v. Palagi, 10 Neb. App. 231, 627 N.W.2d 765 (2001)<br />

A minor child who is away at college still retains the home state domicile of the custodial parent,<br />

and still remains an unemancipated child.<br />

Domicile is that place where a person has his or her true, fixed, and permanent<br />

home.<br />

The habitation or residence of a minor child is, by operation of law, determined and<br />

fixed by that of the parent legally entitled to the custody and control of the child<br />

unless the parent has voluntarily surrendered such right.<br />

- 56 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!