23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Weinand v. Weinand, 260 Neb. 146, 616 N.W.2d 1 (2000)<br />

[A]bsent exceptional circumstances that invoke equitable principles, an exstepparent<br />

generally does not have a duty to support an ex-stepchild after the<br />

termination of the marriage to the child’s biological parent.<br />

A district court in a dissolution action, acting pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §42-364<br />

(Reissue 1998), has jurisdiction to grant rights of visitation to an ex-stepparent when<br />

that ex-stepparent establishes that during the marriage he or she acted as a parent<br />

to the stepchild.<br />

Must an ex-stepparent who is awarded rights of reasonable visitation in a divorce<br />

decree pay child support as a consequence of such an award when that child is now<br />

living with, and being supported by, both her natural mother and the man judicially<br />

determined to be her natural father?<br />

In the absence of a statute, it is clear that the common law does not impose a<br />

liability for support upon stepparents except in some instances where the stepparent<br />

voluntarily takes the stepchild into his or her family and assumes, in loco parentis,<br />

the obligations incident to a parental relationship.<br />

The <strong>Nebraska</strong> divorce statutes do not impose a duty upon any individual other<br />

than a parent to pay for the support of minor children.<br />

We, therefore, hold that in circumstances where a minor child is living with, and<br />

being supported by, both of his or her natural parents, the statutory responsibility for<br />

the child’s support is solely that of the natural parents. The ex-stepfather can no<br />

longer be statutorily obligated for the support of his ex-stepdaughter.<br />

Welch v. Welch, Jr., 246 Neb. 435, 519 N.W.2d 262 (1994)<br />

As a general rule, the custodial parent’s right of support and the noncustodial<br />

parent’s right of visitation are entitled to separate enforcement. A failure to pay child<br />

support does not justify a parent’s unilateral withdrawal of visitation rights, and a<br />

failure to allow visitation does not justify a parent’s unilateral nonpayment of support.<br />

a court may suspend child support payments when the custodial parent deprives the<br />

noncustodial parent of visitation and there is no showing that the children are in<br />

need.<br />

Wilson v. Wilson, 224 Neb. 589, 399 N.W.2d 802 (1987)<br />

The Mother of all parenting/visitation schedule cases. Considered the “Holy Grail” in Family<br />

Law for over two decades.<br />

Default Judgments/Paternity<br />

§ 25-2001(1) (Reissue 2008)<br />

The inherent power of a district court to vacate or modify its judgments or orders during term may<br />

also be exercised after the end of the term, upon the same grounds, upon a motion filed within six<br />

months after the entry of the judgment or order.<br />

§43-1412. Paternity; action to establish; procedure; public hearings prohibited; evidence;<br />

default judgment; decree; payment of costs and fees. (Reissue 2004)<br />

(1) ….<br />

(2) A default judgment shall be entered upon a showing of service and failure of the defendant to<br />

answer or otherwise appear.<br />

- 51 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!