Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$F:\Kevin\2007 Case Lists\Currently on web page\District Judges ...$



$\\orion\ChildSupport\Kevin\2007 Case Lists\Currently on web page ...$

Western Interstate Child Support Enforcement Council (WICSEC) - www.wicsec.org/ Amended and expanded rules for use of interpreters in Courts: There are now 9 pages of court rules regarding the use of interpreters in the court system of Nebraska. See http://www.supremecourt.ne.gov/rules/pdf/Ch6Art7.pdf for full details. These latest rules are effective Oct. 21, 2009. Interpreter costs are eligible for federal/state reimbursement The Nebraska Supreme Court amended rules for use of interpreters, effective 7- 01-2007. With interpreter costs rising, it is important to note that these costs are eligible for reimbursement by your office or by the court. See generally www.supremecourt.ne.gov/rules/amendments/feescheduleamdmt.pdf and www.supremecourt.ne.gov/rules/amendments/interpreteramdmts.pdf A portion of the updated court rule is reprinted below: The Nebraska Supreme Court establishes the following interpreter fee schedule: A. For interpreters: $35.00 per hour, two hour minimum. B. For an interpreter who is a Nebraska Supreme Court Certified Court Interpreter, $50.00 per hour, two hour minimum. C. (1) Certified sign interpreters for the deaf and hard of hearing, $50.00 per hour. (Certified sign interpreters possess a Level I classification pursuant to rule 1D of the Supreme Court Rules Relating to Court Interpreters, i.e., interpreters who hold at least one of the following RID certificates: Specialist Certificate: Legal (SC:L), NIC Master, NIC Advanced, CI/CT, CSC. Deaf interpreters who hold CLIP-R or CDI). (2) Non-certified sign interpreters, $35.00 per hour. (Non-certified sign interpreters possess a Level II classification pursuant to rule 1D of the Supreme Court Rules Relating to Court Interpreters, i.e., interpreters who hold RID NIC, RID CI, RID CT, NAD 4 or 5, QAST 4/4 or higher. Deaf interpreters who hold a Nebraska Specialist Intermediary License). D. Unless otherwise agreed to, interpreters shall be paid by the hour in thirty minute increments. Time shall be determined by using the next highest thirty minute increment (i.e., 2 hours 4 minutes equals 2 hours 30 minutes). IRS Mileage Reimbursement, Effective January 1, 2013 The IRS has set the mileage reimbursable rate to 56.5 cents per mile. This is effective for 2012. Section 23-1112 outlines the procedures for county officials to receive reimbursement for mileage to perform/attend county functions. http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/100715 Nebraska Worker’s Compensation Court update Nebraska Workers’ Compensation maximum income benefit set at $728.00 per week http://www.wcc.ne.gov/legal/benefit_rates.aspx Nebraska Worker’s Compensation Court Web Site: www.wcc.ne.gov/ - 204 -
Effective January 1, 2013, the maximum weekly income benefit under the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act is $728.00. This amount applies to work-related injuries and illnesses occurring on or after January 1, 2013. This amount equals 100 percent of the state average weekly wage as determined by the administrator of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court. An historic look at worker’s comp. benefit rates in Nebraska may be found at http://www.wcc.ne.gov/legal/benefits.pdf For more information regarding workers’ compensation in Nebraska, please call the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court information line at 800-599-5155 or 402-471- 6468. The court’s Web site (www.wcc.ne.gov/) also contains information regarding the court’s operations. Note: Worker’s compensation benefits are subject to withholding for child support. Relevant recent legislation/policy news: §43-1724. Any employer or other payor who fails to withhold and remit any income of an obligor receiving income from the employer or other payor, after proper notice as provided in section 43-1723, shall be required to pay the certified amount to the State Disbursement Unit. The county attorney or authorized attorney may file an action in district court to enforce this section. The court may sanction an employer or other payor twenty-five dollars per day, up to five hundred dollars per incident, for failure to comply with proper notice. $25 Federal Pass-through – As part of federal deficit reduction legislation passed in 2006, IV-D cases where the custodial parent does not receive TANF benefits are now subject to an annual $25 fee, based on the State fiscal year of Oct. 1 – Sept. 30. The updated CSE 60 form explains this new rule. UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE for trial Courts § 6-1504. Domestic relations cases. (A) All applications for temporary custody, support, and maintenance shall comply with Nebraska statutes. (B) All applications for temporary support and allowances shall be determined without testimony upon argument and affidavits setting forth information required by Nebraska Child Support Guidelines and Nebraska statutes. (C) A properly completed Department of Health Bureau of Vital Statistics form shall be filed with each petition for dissolution of marriage, and no decree will be entered unless each form is completed in full. - 205 -
Page 1 and 2:
The Unicameral remains in session u
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents:* * (accessible v
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents (continued): Mili
Page 7 and 8:
A Note for Legal Practitioners: Mem
Page 9 and 10:
Secondly, I have taken the approach
Page 11 and 12:
sections, the county attorney or au
Page 13 and 14:
final court-ordered determination t
Page 15 and 16:
clerk of the district court in whic
Page 17 and 18:
(1) In proceedings under sections 4
Page 19 and 20:
Nebraska courts, through their inhe
Page 21 and 22:
place. This recommendation recogniz
Page 23 and 24:
(4) Orders, decrees, and judgments
Page 25 and 26:
Mother apparently consents to this
Page 27 and 28:
Johnson v. Johnson, 215 Neb. 689, 3
Page 29 and 30:
stand dismissed without prejudice a
Page 31 and 32:
This case includes an excellent sum
Page 33 and 34:
Koch v. Koch, 226 Neb. 305, 312, 41
Page 35 and 36:
We conclude that the state was not
Page 37 and 38:
Modifying the amounts awarded to a
Page 39 and 40:
[P]ublic policy forbids enforcement
Page 41 and 42:
Carroll v. Moore, 228 Neb. 561, 423
Page 43 and 44:
(3) … A rebuttable presumption of
Page 45 and 46:
Lenz v. Lenz, 222 Neb. 85, 382 N.W.
Page 47 and 48:
Finally, we conclude that for futur
Page 49 and 50:
(7) Criminal nonsupport is a Class
Page 51 and 52:
A mother’s testimony that one is
Page 53 and 54:
Neither of the parties is authorize
Page 55 and 56:
In guardianship termination proceed
Page 57 and 58:
Weinand v. Weinand, 260 Neb. 146, 6
Page 59 and 60:
verification forms instead of tax r
Page 61 and 62:
State v. Cummings, 2 Neb. App. 820,
Page 63 and 64:
Where parents of the child are sepa
Page 65 and 66:
any unpaid child support obligation
Page 67 and 68:
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 91
Page 69 and 70:
(0,1,2,or 3+) and how much “earne
Page 71 and 72:
Earning capacity may be used as a b
Page 73 and 74:
esponding state is modifying a supp
Page 75 and 76:
[T]he duration of the support oblig
Page 77 and 78:
A future payment of child support i
Page 79 and 80:
Such a credit clause does not viola
Page 81 and 82:
State on behalf of L.L.B. v. Hill,
Page 83 and 84:
(1) That withholding is not proper
Page 85 and 86:
Source: Laws 1974, LB 354, § 226,
Page 87 and 88:
In re Interest of Lakota Z. & Jacob
Page 89 and 90:
Note: In July 2008 the Federal Chil
Page 91 and 92:
Erica J. v. Dewitt, 265 Neb. 728, 6
Page 93 and 94:
Moore v. Bauer, 11 Neb. App. 572, 6
Page 95 and 96:
Sears v. Larson, 259 Neb. 760, 612
Page 97 and 98:
health care coverage is not availab
Page 99 and 100:
Druba v. Druba , 238 Neb. 279, 470
Page 101 and 102:
Rouse v. Rouse, 18 Neb. App. 128, 7
Page 103 and 104:
There is a presumption that income
Page 105 and 106:
The Nebraska Supreme Court has not
Page 107 and 108:
§42-364.12 Child support; withhold
Page 109 and 110:
Source: Laws 1985, Second Spec. Ses
Page 111 and 112:
shall withhold for each notice the
Page 113 and 114:
forward the child support payment.
Page 115 and 116:
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act of
Page 117 and 118:
Judgments (see also Jurisdiction) 2
Page 119 and 120:
Source: Laws 1972, LB 820, § 5; La
Page 121 and 122:
[J]urisdiction is the inherent powe
Page 123 and 124:
A nonimmigrant alien authorized to
Page 125 and 126:
In re Interest of Tamika S. et al.,
Page 127 and 128:
action to certify the license holde
Page 129 and 130:
NCP had no control as to when trust
Page 131 and 132:
[T]he district court abused its dis
Page 133 and 134:
Note: In response to a new federal
Page 135 and 136:
(1) Child support orders in cases i
Page 137 and 138:
§43-512.17. Title IV-D child suppo
Page 139 and 140:
In the initial determination of chi
Page 141 and 142:
The federal government provides Soc
Page 143 and 144:
Material change in circumstances in
Page 145 and 146:
Peter v. Peter, 262 Neb. 1017, 637
Page 147 and 148:
See also: Wilkins v. Wilkins, 269 N
Page 149 and 150:
Adoption/Modification of the Nebras
Page 151 and 152:
A party seeking to modify a dissolu
Page 153 and 154:
(2)The department, through its agen
Page 155 and 156:
§ 43-1408.01 Notarized acknowledgm
Page 157 and 158:
(4) All judgments under this sectio
Page 159 and 160: See also Shermanv. Neth, 283 Neb. 8
Page 161 and 162: grounds of newly discovered evidenc
Page 163 and 164: Fianna has resided with Jeffrey sin
Page 165 and 166: State on Behalf of Hopkins v. Batt,
Page 167 and 168: (4) . . . (a) If any case contains
Page 169 and 170: CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL REC
Page 171 and 172: To prevail on a motion to remove a
Page 173 and 174: Cooper v. Cooper, 8 Neb. App. 532,
Page 175 and 176: What God -- or the State -- has law
Page 177 and 178: court should take into consideratio
Page 179 and 180: Federal Express (FedEx): FedEx Prio
Page 181 and 182: (c) PENALTY FOR MAKING OR USING FAL
Page 183 and 184: Recipients who are married and file
Page 185 and 186: provision for support is a part of
Page 187 and 188: Material change in circumstances in
Page 189 and 190: [A]limony should not be used to equ
Page 191 and 192: contumacious, but it provides no re
Page 193 and 194: parties will have to start over aga
Page 195 and 196: state has and shall exercise contin
Page 197 and 198: § 42-735 Administrative enforcemen
Page 199 and 200: (2) notify the nonregistering party
Page 201 and 202: allegations of a petition invokes t
Page 203 and 204: petitioner had failed to come to th
Page 205 and 206: . . . have the force and effect of
Page 207 and 208: caused or contributed to the cause
Page 209: in determining the child support ob
Page 213 and 214: § 6-1521. Protection of personal a
Page 215 and 216: In contrast to recent years, the 20
Page 217 and 218: Military Retirement pay info - www.
Page 219 and 220: Daily Legal Newswire - www.law.com/
Page 221: Above All Else: Keep your sense of
show all

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?