23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

parties will have to start over again. When paternity is involved, the termination of the case<br />

terminates the finding of paternity, forcing the child support interests to “start from scratch”<br />

with a new complaint for paternity and support.<br />

Termination of Parental Rights<br />

This treatise does not attempt to provide an exhaustive treatment on the issue of<br />

termination of parental rights. However, often times families affected by child support orders we<br />

are charged with enforcing end up in juvenile court with allegations of abuse, neglect, or<br />

abandonment. Particularly with the issue of child abandonment our appellate courts seem to be<br />

taking a harder line as to what constitutes grounds for termination of parental rights. I will list<br />

below a few appellate cases that address these issues and set guidelines for when a parent<br />

should have their parental rights and child support responsibilities terminated.<br />

In re Interest of Angelica L. & Daniel L., 277 Neb. 984, 767 N.W.2d 74 (2009)<br />

The jurisdiction of the State in juvenile adjudication cases arises out of the power<br />

every sovereignty possesses as parens patriae to every child within its borders to<br />

determine the status and custody that will best meet the child’s needs and wants.<br />

a court may not properly deprive a parent of the custody of his or her minor child<br />

unless the State affirmatively establishes that such parent is unfit to perform the<br />

duties imposed by the relationship, or has forfeited that right.<br />

The fact that a child has been placed outside the home for 15 or more of the most<br />

recent 22 months does not demonstrate parental unfitness. The placement of a<br />

child outside the home for 15 or more of the most recent 22 months under Neb. Rev.<br />

Stat. § 43-292(7) (Reissue 2008) merely provides a guideline for what would be a<br />

reasonable time for parents to rehabilitate themselves to a minimum level of fitness.<br />

Regardless of the length of time a child is placed outside the home, it is always the<br />

State’s burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the parent is unfit and<br />

that the child’s best interests are served by his or her continued removal from<br />

parental custody.<br />

The “best interests” standard is subject to the overriding presumption that the<br />

relationship between parent and child is constitutionally protected and that the best<br />

interests of a child are served by reuniting the child with his or her parent. This<br />

presumption is overcome only when the parent has been proved unfit.<br />

In re Interest of Angelina G. Et Al., 20 Neb. App. 646, ___ N.W.2d ___ (April 2013)<br />

Parental rights can be terminated only when the court finds that termination is in the<br />

child’s best interests.<br />

A termination of parental rights is a final and complete severance of the child from<br />

the parent and removes the entire bundle of parental rights. With such severe and<br />

final consequences, parental rights should be terminated only in the absence of any<br />

reasonable alternative and as the last resort.<br />

Where a parent is unable or unwilling to rehabilitate himself or herself within a<br />

reasonable time, the best interests of the child require termination of the parental<br />

rights. <strong>Child</strong>ren cannot, and should not, be suspended in foster care or be made to<br />

await uncertain parental maturity.<br />

- 187 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!