23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

assessment of fees under § 25-824. There, it was stated that the offending party<br />

had demonstrated a disdain for common law and common sense.<br />

[from the dissent:] The term "ex rel.", or ex relatione, is defined as "[l]egal<br />

proceedings which are instituted by the attorney general (or other proper person) in<br />

the name and behalf of the state, but on the information and at the instigation of an<br />

individual who has a private interest in the matter...." Black's Law Dictionary 582 (6th<br />

ed. 1990).<br />

Note: In civil proceedings where paternity is an issue, most states provide that there must be<br />

corroboration to support the mother’s testimony that the respondent is the father. Other cases<br />

addressing the need for corroboration in the testimony as to paternity include:<br />

State ex rel. Klostermeier v. Klostermeier, 161 Neb. 247, 72 N.W.2d 848 (1955)<br />

Lockman v. Fulton, 162 Neb. 439, 76 N.W.2d 452 (1956)<br />

Wade v. Hicks, 191 Neb. 847, 218 N.W.2d 222 (1974)<br />

State on behalf of Cooper v. Harmon, 2 Neb. App. 612, 512 N.W.2d 656 (1994)<br />

Perkins v. Perkins, 198 Neb. 401, 253 N.W.2d 42 (1977)<br />

The presumption favoring legitimacy of children may only be rebutted by clear and<br />

convincing evidence beyond the testimony of husband or wife denying child’s<br />

legitimacy.<br />

Snay v. Snarr, 195 Neb. 375, 238 N.W.2d 234 (1976)<br />

In a paternity proceeding, only a preponderance of evidence is necessary to<br />

sustain a verdict.<br />

Snodgrass v. Snodgrass, 241 Neb. 43, 486 N.W.2d 215 (1992)<br />

When the trial court in the original decree determined paternity, and no appeal<br />

was taken, that determination is final.<br />

Appellant chose not to assert that the older child was not his at any time until after<br />

appellant had been determined to be in contempt. Paternity was determined by the<br />

court in the original decree herein. That determination was not appealed and is,<br />

therefore, final. Appellant raises no new facts or circumstances which require the<br />

district court to reopen the decree.<br />

State on behalf of Cooper v. Harmon, 2 Neb. App. 612, 512 N.W.2d 656 (1994)<br />

Relevant evidence of paternity includes evidence of sexual intercourse between the<br />

mother and alleged father at any possible time of conception and the results of blood<br />

testing. Corroboration means independent evidence which tends to strengthen or<br />

otherwise to confirm the testimony of the mother of the child whose paternity is in<br />

issue.<br />

State on behalf of Dady v. Snelling, 10 Neb. App. 740, 637 N.W.2d 906 (2001)<br />

Under § 43-1415(3), evidence of genetic testing results can be introduced without<br />

foundational testimony or other proof of authenticity or accuracy in regard to the<br />

testing itself, unless there is a written request for personal testimony of the expert at<br />

least 30 days prior to trial.<br />

- 158 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!