- Page 1 and 2: The Unicameral remains in session u
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents:* * (accessible v
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents (continued): Mili
- Page 7 and 8: A Note for Legal Practitioners: Mem
- Page 9: Secondly, I have taken the approach
- Page 13 and 14: final court-ordered determination t
- Page 15 and 16: clerk of the district court in whic
- Page 17 and 18: (1) In proceedings under sections 4
- Page 19 and 20: Nebraska courts, through their inhe
- Page 21 and 22: place. This recommendation recogniz
- Page 23 and 24: (4) Orders, decrees, and judgments
- Page 25 and 26: Mother apparently consents to this
- Page 27 and 28: Johnson v. Johnson, 215 Neb. 689, 3
- Page 29 and 30: stand dismissed without prejudice a
- Page 31 and 32: This case includes an excellent sum
- Page 33 and 34: Koch v. Koch, 226 Neb. 305, 312, 41
- Page 35 and 36: We conclude that the state was not
- Page 37 and 38: Modifying the amounts awarded to a
- Page 39 and 40: [P]ublic policy forbids enforcement
- Page 41 and 42: Carroll v. Moore, 228 Neb. 561, 423
- Page 43 and 44: (3) … A rebuttable presumption of
- Page 45 and 46: Lenz v. Lenz, 222 Neb. 85, 382 N.W.
- Page 47 and 48: Finally, we conclude that for futur
- Page 49 and 50: (7) Criminal nonsupport is a Class
- Page 51 and 52: A mother’s testimony that one is
- Page 53 and 54: Neither of the parties is authorize
- Page 55 and 56: In guardianship termination proceed
- Page 57 and 58: Weinand v. Weinand, 260 Neb. 146, 6
- Page 59 and 60: verification forms instead of tax r
- Page 61 and 62:
State v. Cummings, 2 Neb. App. 820,
- Page 63 and 64:
Where parents of the child are sepa
- Page 65 and 66:
any unpaid child support obligation
- Page 67 and 68:
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 91
- Page 69 and 70:
(0,1,2,or 3+) and how much “earne
- Page 71 and 72:
Earning capacity may be used as a b
- Page 73 and 74:
esponding state is modifying a supp
- Page 75 and 76:
[T]he duration of the support oblig
- Page 77 and 78:
A future payment of child support i
- Page 79 and 80:
Such a credit clause does not viola
- Page 81 and 82:
State on behalf of L.L.B. v. Hill,
- Page 83 and 84:
(1) That withholding is not proper
- Page 85 and 86:
Source: Laws 1974, LB 354, § 226,
- Page 87 and 88:
In re Interest of Lakota Z. & Jacob
- Page 89 and 90:
Note: In July 2008 the Federal Chil
- Page 91 and 92:
Erica J. v. Dewitt, 265 Neb. 728, 6
- Page 93 and 94:
Moore v. Bauer, 11 Neb. App. 572, 6
- Page 95 and 96:
Sears v. Larson, 259 Neb. 760, 612
- Page 97 and 98:
health care coverage is not availab
- Page 99 and 100:
Druba v. Druba , 238 Neb. 279, 470
- Page 101 and 102:
Rouse v. Rouse, 18 Neb. App. 128, 7
- Page 103 and 104:
There is a presumption that income
- Page 105 and 106:
The Nebraska Supreme Court has not
- Page 107 and 108:
§42-364.12 Child support; withhold
- Page 109 and 110:
Source: Laws 1985, Second Spec. Ses
- Page 111 and 112:
shall withhold for each notice the
- Page 113 and 114:
forward the child support payment.
- Page 115 and 116:
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act of
- Page 117 and 118:
Judgments (see also Jurisdiction) 2
- Page 119 and 120:
Source: Laws 1972, LB 820, § 5; La
- Page 121 and 122:
[J]urisdiction is the inherent powe
- Page 123 and 124:
A nonimmigrant alien authorized to
- Page 125 and 126:
In re Interest of Tamika S. et al.,
- Page 127 and 128:
action to certify the license holde
- Page 129 and 130:
NCP had no control as to when trust
- Page 131 and 132:
[T]he district court abused its dis
- Page 133 and 134:
Note: In response to a new federal
- Page 135 and 136:
(1) Child support orders in cases i
- Page 137 and 138:
§43-512.17. Title IV-D child suppo
- Page 139 and 140:
In the initial determination of chi
- Page 141 and 142:
The federal government provides Soc
- Page 143 and 144:
Material change in circumstances in
- Page 145 and 146:
Peter v. Peter, 262 Neb. 1017, 637
- Page 147 and 148:
See also: Wilkins v. Wilkins, 269 N
- Page 149 and 150:
Adoption/Modification of the Nebras
- Page 151 and 152:
A party seeking to modify a dissolu
- Page 153 and 154:
(2)The department, through its agen
- Page 155 and 156:
§ 43-1408.01 Notarized acknowledgm
- Page 157 and 158:
(4) All judgments under this sectio
- Page 159 and 160:
See also Shermanv. Neth, 283 Neb. 8
- Page 161 and 162:
grounds of newly discovered evidenc
- Page 163 and 164:
Fianna has resided with Jeffrey sin
- Page 165 and 166:
State on Behalf of Hopkins v. Batt,
- Page 167 and 168:
(4) . . . (a) If any case contains
- Page 169 and 170:
CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL REC
- Page 171 and 172:
To prevail on a motion to remove a
- Page 173 and 174:
Cooper v. Cooper, 8 Neb. App. 532,
- Page 175 and 176:
What God -- or the State -- has law
- Page 177 and 178:
court should take into consideratio
- Page 179 and 180:
Federal Express (FedEx): FedEx Prio
- Page 181 and 182:
(c) PENALTY FOR MAKING OR USING FAL
- Page 183 and 184:
Recipients who are married and file
- Page 185 and 186:
provision for support is a part of
- Page 187 and 188:
Material change in circumstances in
- Page 189 and 190:
[A]limony should not be used to equ
- Page 191 and 192:
contumacious, but it provides no re
- Page 193 and 194:
parties will have to start over aga
- Page 195 and 196:
state has and shall exercise contin
- Page 197 and 198:
§ 42-735 Administrative enforcemen
- Page 199 and 200:
(2) notify the nonregistering party
- Page 201 and 202:
allegations of a petition invokes t
- Page 203 and 204:
petitioner had failed to come to th
- Page 205 and 206:
. . . have the force and effect of
- Page 207 and 208:
caused or contributed to the cause
- Page 209 and 210:
in determining the child support ob
- Page 211 and 212:
Effective January 1, 2013, the maxi
- Page 213 and 214:
§ 6-1521. Protection of personal a
- Page 215 and 216:
In contrast to recent years, the 20
- Page 217 and 218:
Military Retirement pay info - www.
- Page 219 and 220:
Daily Legal Newswire - www.law.com/
- Page 221:
Above All Else: Keep your sense of