Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

or law of another state substantially similar to section 28-706 or (ii) the incarcerated individual
has a documented record of willfully failing or neglecting to provide proper support which he or
she knew or reasonably should have known he or she was legally obligated to provide when he
or she had sufficient resources to provide such support, or (iii) the incarceration is a result of a
conviction for a crime in which the child who is the subject of the child support order was
victimized;…. . .
(2) The department, a county attorney, or an authorized attorney shall not in any case be
responsible for reviewing or filing an application to modify child support for individuals
incarcerated as described in subdivision (1)(b) of this section.
Practice Note: §42-358 (3) indicates that where the child support payment history shows that
the obligated parent is in arrears, a prima facie case of contempt is made. Arguendo that
should be all that is needed to shift the burden to the incarcerated parent to disprove that he or
she was acting willfully or neglectfully with regard to their child support obligation at the time
they walked (shackled) into prison. (Hat tip to Tyler Jacobsen in the Lancaster Co. Attorney’s
office)
Legacy Cases(?). Their relevance post 2007 is in doubt.
State o/b/o Longnecker v. Longnecker, 11 Neb. App. 773, 660 N.W.2d 544 (2003)
In considering a petition for the modification of child support, a different test is applied if
an individual is incarcerated when an initial determination of child support is made versus
when a modification of child support is sought.
A petition for the modification of child support will be denied if a change in financial
condition is due to fault or voluntary wastage or dissipation of one’s talents and assets.
Ohler v. Ohler, 220 Neb. 272, 369 N.W.2d 615 (1985)
Incarceration is not a material change of circumstances warranting suspension of child
support obligation
Incarceration is certainly a foreseeable result of criminal activity; we find no sound reason
to relieve one of a child support obligation by virtue of the fact that he or she engaged in
criminal conduct.
Newer Case Law re. Incarceration and Modification
Hopkins v. Stauffer, 18 Neb. App. 116, 775 N.W.2d 457 (2009)
Facts: Proving he is a failure at everything, Father tries unsuccessfully to murder his wife, is
arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to 20-40 years incarceration. Obviously he wants his
child support reduced. Under the new legislation he succeeds! A split opinion of the Court of
Appeals. They immediately all went home and took showers.
We conclude that the Legislature intended for an incarcerated inmate to be able to
file his or her own complaint to modify child support and for the incarceration to be
considered an involuntary reduction of income when the conditions of § 43-512.15
(1)(b) are met. We cannot ignore the evident intent of the legislative act merely
because the Legislature could have chosen a better section in which to codify its
amendment. Having settled the meaning of the statute, an appellate court must give
effect to the purpose and intent of the Legislature.
A change in law, rather than the actions of the parties, may itself constitute a
material change in circumstances such to justify a modification of child support.
- 91 -