23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Held: State failed to meet its burden of proof to show parent had earning capacity of minimum<br />

wage income.<br />

[E]arning capacity should be used only if there is evidence that the parent can<br />

realize that capacity through reasonable efforts.<br />

The party seeking the modification has the burden to produce sufficient proof that a<br />

material change of circumstances has occurred that warrants a modification.<br />

The parties ask us to decide whether the material change of circumstances must<br />

exist at the time of filing of the complaint to modify or at the time of the modification<br />

trial. We hold that the change in circumstances must exist at the time of the<br />

modification trial for two reasons. First, because the court’s decision to modify child<br />

support must be based upon the evidence presented in support of the complaint to<br />

modify. Second, because the change in circumstances cannot be temporary.<br />

it would be improper for the court to focus on anything but the most recent<br />

circumstances ascertainable from the evidence.<br />

…such change of circumstances should exist at the time of trial and not merely at<br />

the time of the complaint to modify.<br />

Lee’s decrease in income since the initial complaint to modify was not due to her<br />

fault or voluntary choice. On the contrary, Lee has remained unemployed despite<br />

numerous efforts on her part to find employment.<br />

Although Lee’s employment …lasted for more than 3 months, given that it had<br />

effectively terminated, it could not be reasonably expected to last for an additional 6<br />

months. Thus, the State’s evidence failed to trigger the rebuttable presumption of a<br />

change of circumstances under § 4-217.<br />

See dissent:<br />

The <strong>Nebraska</strong> Supreme Court has held that a material change in<br />

circumstances is a concept which eludes precise, concrete definition. See<br />

Dobbins v. Dobbins, 226 Neb. 465, 411 N.W.2d 644 (1987).<br />

Cooper v. Cooper, 8 Neb. App. 532, 598 N.W.2d 474 (1999)<br />

the trial court did not abuse its discretion when considering the earning capacity of a<br />

mother, who chose to work only part time in order to spend more time with her<br />

children, rather than her actual income when no specific evidence showed an<br />

inability to spend adequate time with the children while she was working 40 hours<br />

per week.<br />

Dworak v. Fugit, 1 Neb. App. 332, 495 N.W.2d 47 (1992)<br />

Holding: Earning capacity, and not mere income, is what a court should focus on<br />

The amount of child support awarded is a function of the status, character, and<br />

situation of the parties…. The primary consideration in determining the level of child<br />

support payments is the best interests of the child.<br />

Henke v. Guerrero, 13 Neb. App. 337, 692 N.W.2d 762 (2005)<br />

<strong>Child</strong> support may be based on a parent’s earning capacity when a parent voluntarily<br />

leaves employment and a reduction in that parent’s support obligation would<br />

seriously impair the needs of the children.<br />

Earning capacity may be used as a basis for an initial determination of child support<br />

under the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines where evidence is presented that the<br />

parent is capable of realizing such capacity through reasonable effort.<br />

- 62 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!