Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
incarceration is a possibility, does require some safeguards to prevent the erroneous<br />
deprivation of liberty. South Carolina Supreme Court reversed and remanded.<br />
‣ To determine whether a right to counsel is required here, opposing interests and the<br />
probable value of “additional or substitute procedural safeguards” must be taken into<br />
account.<br />
‣ An available set of procedural safeguards, if employed together, can significantly<br />
reduce the risk of an erroneous deprivation of liberty. These include:<br />
(1) notice to the defendant that his “ability to pay” is a critical issue in the contempt<br />
proceeding;<br />
(2) the use of a form (or the equivalent) to elicit relevant financial information from<br />
him;<br />
(3) an opportunity at the hearing for him to respond to statements and questions<br />
about his financial status; and<br />
(4) an express finding by the court that the defendant has the ability to pay.<br />
‣ The record indicates that Turner received neither counsel nor the benefit of<br />
alternative procedures like those we have described. He did not receive clear notice<br />
that his ability to pay would constitute the critical question in his civil contempt<br />
proceeding. No one provided him with aform (or the equivalent) designed to elicit<br />
information about his financial circumstances. The court did not find that Turner was<br />
able to pay his arrearage, but instead left the relevant “finding” section of the<br />
contempt order blank. The court nonetheless found Turner in contempt and ordered<br />
him incarcerated. Under these circumstances Turner’s incarceration violated the<br />
Due Process Clause.<br />
‣ This decision does not address civil contempt proceedings where the underlying<br />
support payment is owed to the State. (likely in such matters the right of an indigent<br />
NCP to court appointed counsel would be guaranteed.)<br />
Duty to <strong>Support</strong>; Duration of <strong>Support</strong><br />
§42-371.01 Duty to pay child support; termination, when; procedure; State Court<br />
Administrator; duties.<br />
(1) An obligor’s duty to pay child support for a child terminates when (a) the child<br />
reaches nineteen years of age, (b) the child marries, (c) the child dies, or (d) the child is<br />
emancipated by a court of competent jurisdiction, unless the court order for child support<br />
specifically extends child support after such circumstances.<br />
(2) The termination of child support does not relieve the obligor from the duty to pay<br />
any unpaid child support obligations owed or in arrears.<br />
(3) The obligor may provide written application for termination of a child support order<br />
when the child being supported reaches nineteen years of age, marries, dies, or is otherwise<br />
emancipated. The application shall be filed with the clerk of the district court where child<br />
support was ordered. A certified copy of the birth certificate, marriage license, death certificate,<br />
- 56 -