23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Default Judgments/Paternity<br />

§ 25-2001(1) (Reissue 2008)<br />

The inherent power of a district court to vacate or modify its<br />

judgments or orders during term may also be exercised after the end of<br />

the term, upon the same grounds, upon a motion filed within six<br />

months after the entry of the judgment or order.<br />

§43-1412. Paternity; action to establish; procedure; public<br />

hearings prohibited; evidence; default judgment; decree;<br />

payment of costs and fees. (Reissue 2004)<br />

(1) ….<br />

(2) A default judgment shall be entered upon a showing of service and failure of the defendant to<br />

answer or otherwise appear.<br />

Carlson v. Two Rivers Auto, Inc. ___ Neb. App. ___ (1994)<br />

In reviewing a trial court’s action in vacating or refusing to vacate a default judgment,<br />

an appellate court will uphold and affirm the trial court’s action in the absence of an<br />

abuse of discretion.<br />

It has been held that “’ default judgment will not ordinarily be set aside on the<br />

application of a party who, by his own fault, negligence, or want of diligence, has<br />

failed to protect his own interests. . . .’” Fredericks v. Western Livestock Auction<br />

Co., 225 Neb. 211, at 217, 403 N.W.2d 377 at 382 (1987).<br />

In considering a request to set aside a default judgment, the trial court may<br />

consider the promptness of the motion to vacate, negligence or want of diligence of<br />

the party moving to vacate, and avoidance of unnecessary delays and frivolous<br />

proceedings.<br />

Modern cases consistently hold that a “party seeking to vacate a default judgment<br />

[in either county or district court] must tender an answer or other proof disclosing a<br />

meritorious defense.” Steinberg v. Stahlnecker, 200 Neb. 466, 468, 263 N.W.2d<br />

861, 863 (1978)<br />

State on behalf of A.E. vs. Buckhalter, 273 Neb. 443, 730 N.W.2d 340 (2007)<br />

[A] party who is served with summons and a copy of the complaint and fails to<br />

answer or make an appearance in a case is not entitled to further notice of a<br />

hearing.<br />

“A party’s voluntary inaction and inattention should not be permitted to paralyze<br />

the ordinary and orderly functioning of the legal process.” Citing Tejral v. Tejral,<br />

220 Neb. 264, 369 N.W.2d 359 (1985).<br />

[W]hen the court has entered a default judgment and the defendant has made a<br />

prompt application at the same term to set it aside, with the tender of an answer or<br />

other proof disclosing a meritorious defense, the court should on reasonable<br />

terms sustain the motion and permit the cause to be heard on the merits. A<br />

meritorious or substantial defense or cause means one which is worthy of judicial<br />

inquiry because it raises a question of law deserving some investigation and<br />

discussion or a real controversy as to the essential facts.12 To vacate the default<br />

judgment, Buckhalter is not required to show that he will ultimately prevail, but only<br />

that he has a recognized defense that is not frivolous.<br />

- 50 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!