- Page 1 and 2:
Have a Wonderful Summer! Child Supp
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents:* * (accessible v
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents (continued): Mult
- Page 7 and 8:
A Note for Legal Practitioners: Mem
- Page 9 and 10:
Overview/ IV-D Attorney Duty Gangwi
- Page 11 and 12:
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-105(2) (Reissu
- Page 13 and 14:
See Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248
- Page 15 and 16:
their attorney of record and, excep
- Page 17 and 18:
State ex rel. Lemon v. Gale, 272 Ne
- Page 19 and 20:
disobedience as an essential elemen
- Page 21 and 22:
student loan that the noncustodial
- Page 23 and 24:
having jurisdiction to compel the s
- Page 25 and 26:
Drew on Behalf of Reed v. Reed, 16
- Page 27 and 28:
income, is to be considered in dete
- Page 29 and 30:
§ 48-802 - Statutes, General Rules
- Page 31 and 32:
from arriving on the scene, either
- Page 33 and 34:
In equity cases trial judges should
- Page 35 and 36:
Similarly, a party who does more th
- Page 37 and 38:
Common Law Marriages States that au
- Page 39 and 40:
Constitutional Issues/ Statutory In
- Page 41 and 42:
Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1, 101
- Page 43 and 44:
In re Interest of Thomas M., 282 Ne
- Page 45 and 46:
See Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kre
- Page 47 and 48:
Because a conditional commitment is
- Page 49 and 50:
obligation when he currently has an
- Page 51 and 52:
An order modifying child custody wh
- Page 53 and 54:
Haynes v. Haynes, 205 Neb. 35, 286
- Page 55 and 56:
Stuhr v. Stuhr, 240 Neb. 239, 481 N
- Page 57 and 58:
By failing to take the genetic test
- Page 59 and 60:
State on behalf of L.L.B. v. Hill,
- Page 61 and 62:
Due Process Conn v. Conn, 13 Neb. A
- Page 63 and 64:
or court order of emancipation or a
- Page 65 and 66:
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 91
- Page 67 and 68:
they have income. There is no floor
- Page 69 and 70:
Lainson v. Lainson, 219 Neb. 170, 3
- Page 71 and 72:
Millatmal v. Millatmal, 272 Neb. 45
- Page 73 and 74:
24A Am. Jur. 2d Divorce and Separat
- Page 75 and 76:
[T]he fact that [the custodial pare
- Page 77 and 78:
The same principles that apply with
- Page 79 and 80:
“[C]oncerns regarding the stigma
- Page 81 and 82:
(a) The interpretation of the suppo
- Page 83 and 84:
make the appointment. In other case
- Page 85 and 86:
Guidelines Issues (Including suffic
- Page 87 and 88:
Note: In July 2008 the Federal Chil
- Page 89 and 90:
Erica J. v. Dewitt, 265 Neb. 728, 6
- Page 91 and 92:
Morrill County v. Darsaklis, 7 Neb.
- Page 93 and 94:
Any deviation from the guidelines m
- Page 95 and 96:
to also pay reimbursement for reaso
- Page 97 and 98:
or law of another state substantial
- Page 99 and 100:
§43-1711 Income, defined. Income s
- Page 101 and 102:
Simpson v. Simpson, 275 Neb. 152, 7
- Page 103 and 104:
§42-364.09. Child support; withhol
- Page 105 and 106:
§43-1709. Employer or other payor,
- Page 107 and 108:
(6) That the employer or other payo
- Page 109 and 110:
income withholding for current supp
- Page 111 and 112:
Title IV-D Division of the Departme
- Page 113 and 114:
Held: The state was acting beyond i
- Page 115 and 116:
(3) Any juvenile…whose parent, gu
- Page 117 and 118:
proceeding or a new action. Since t
- Page 119 and 120:
State, Dept. of Social Services v.
- Page 121 and 122:
amount equal to the support due and
- Page 123 and 124:
Source: Laws 1975, LB 212, § 8; La
- Page 125 and 126:
The second is used in aid of an exe
- Page 127 and 128:
Halsted v. Halsted, 169 Neb. 325, 9
- Page 129 and 130:
Neb. Ct. R. § 4-217 Modification.
- Page 131 and 132:
she had sufficient resources to pro
- Page 133 and 134:
If applicable, earning capacity may
- Page 135 and 136:
Gress v. Gress, 274 Neb. 686, 743 N
- Page 137 and 138:
A district court may modify a regis
- Page 139 and 140:
Peter v. Peter, 262 Neb. 1017, 637
- Page 141 and 142:
See also: Wilkins v. Wilkins, 269 N
- Page 143 and 144:
Under certain circumstances, an ame
- Page 145 and 146:
A party seeking to modify a dissolu
- Page 147 and 148:
(2)The department, through its agen
- Page 149 and 150:
§ 43-1408.01 Notarized acknowledgm
- Page 151 and 152:
§43-1414. Genetic testing; procedu
- Page 153 and 154:
Carlson v. Bartels, 143 Neb. 680, 1
- Page 155 and 156:
as to the paternity of the minor ch
- Page 157 and 158:
Jones v. Paulson, 261 Neb. 327, 622
- Page 159 and 160: in loco parentis to the child. See,
- Page 161 and 162: (b) If the court orders income with
- Page 163 and 164: enforcement, for example, we are fo
- Page 165 and 166: ights of visitation. Later mother c
- Page 167 and 168: Matchett v. Dunkle, 244 Neb. 639, 5
- Page 169 and 170: Connecticut, the District of Columb
- Page 171 and 172: In order to stand in loco parentis,
- Page 173 and 174: Of particular interest is the requi
- Page 175 and 176: Social Security (Also see Equity, E
- Page 177 and 178: Calculate support this way: 1. Mom
- Page 179 and 180: Spousal support, when used in the c
- Page 181 and 182: punishment for sexual assault in th
- Page 183 and 184: Hall v. Hall, 238 Neb. 686, 472 N.W
- Page 185 and 186: interests of a child are served by
- Page 187 and 188: §42-722. Private counsel. An indiv
- Page 189 and 190: the following three conditions are
- Page 191 and 192: Source: Laws 1993, LB 500, § 43 §
- Page 193 and 194: Despite a basic difference in the n
- Page 195 and 196: Conrad v. Conrad, 208 Neb. 588, 304
- Page 197 and 198: Mace v. Mace, 13 Neb. App. 896, 703
- Page 199 and 200: In re Interest of Chance J., 279 Ne
- Page 201 and 202: per hour, two hour minimum. C. (1)
- Page 203 and 204: (3) If, regardless of whether payme
- Page 205 and 206: Rule 21 adopted April 16, 2008. Ren
- Page 207 and 208: Nebraska Information System (NIS):
- Page 209: web site: www.usmc-mccs.org/contact