Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Thornton v. Thornton, 13 Neb. App. 912, 704 N.W.2d 243 (2005)<br />
Service of Process: Notice. Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-517.02 (Reissue<br />
1995), upon motion and showing by affidavit that service cannot be made with<br />
reasonable diligence by any other method provided by statute, the court may<br />
permit service to be made (1) by leaving the process at the defendant’s usual<br />
place of residence and mailing a copy by first-class mail to the defendant’s lastknown<br />
address, (2) by publication, or (3) by any manner reasonably calculated<br />
under the circumstances to provide the party with actual notice of the<br />
proceedings and an opportunity to be heard.<br />
Statutes prescribing the manner of service of summons are mandatory and must<br />
be strictly complied with. Service by certified mail is not sufficient when statute<br />
required notice to be sent by first-class mail.<br />
White v. Mertens, 225 Neb. 241, 404 N.W.2d 410 (1987)<br />
Absent other statutory remedy, unwed father has recourse to declaratory<br />
judgment statutes to establish parental rights. See §25-21,149 et seq.<br />
Part II: Other Miscellaneous Cases:<br />
Boyle v. Boyle, 12 Neb. App. 681, 684 N.W.2d 49 (2004)<br />
When a document is ambiguous, the meaning of the document is a question of<br />
fact and the trier of fact determines the intent of the parties from all the facts and<br />
circumstances. The trier of fact's determination in this regard will be upheld on<br />
appeal unless clearly erroneous.<br />
Brockman v. Brockman, 264 Neb. 106, 646 N.W.2d 594 (2002)<br />
Reasonable security for payment of child support under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-<br />
371(6) should be invoked only when extraordinary circumstances require it.<br />
Gordon v. Gordon, 231 Neb. 857, 438 N.W.2d 762 (1989)<br />
It is axiomatic that under <strong>Nebraska</strong> law the right to receive child support<br />
payments pursuant to a decree of dissolution is a property right of the custodial<br />
parent. Neb. Rev. Stat. §42-364(4)(note: this statute has since been amended, see<br />
§42-364(6) ). The custodial parent becomes a judgment creditor who may collect<br />
or enforce the child support judgment by execution and the means authorized for<br />
collection of money judgments.<br />
Gress v. Gress, 274 Neb. 686, 743 N.W.2d 67 (2007)<br />
Requiring a parent to pay a share of their child’s daycare obligation is also<br />
subject to paragraph R's basic subsistence limitation. It is an abuse of discretion<br />
for a trial court to order a parent to pay a share of their child’s day care expenses<br />
if those costs will drive the parent below the poverty guidelines as set forth in<br />
Paragraph R. of the child support guidelines.<br />
increased financial obligations, like decreased income, also qualify as a change<br />
in one's financial position. As a result, if (the NCP) is ever forced to pay for<br />
daycare and his income is reduced below the poverty line as a result, Patrick<br />
may seek a modification of the court's child support order.<br />
- 192 -