Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Matchett v. Dunkle, 244 Neb. 639, 508 N.W.2d 580 (1993)<br />
Opens the door to retroactive child support in paternity cases.<br />
Sylvis v. Walling, 248 Neb. 168, 532 N.W.2d 312 (1995)<br />
[A] cause of action for the retroactive support of a child born out of wedlock<br />
belongs not to the mother, but to the child.<br />
[A]n obligation for retroactive child support is not a debt.<br />
Willers v. Willers, 255 Neb. 769, 587 N.W.2d 390 (1998)<br />
Not a classic retro support case. Mother took minor child to Washington State, then filed for<br />
divorce. Washington State entered the divorce, but no support was ordered because the court<br />
lacked jurisdiction over the husband/father. Now father has been brought to court in <strong>Nebraska</strong><br />
and custodial parent sought support retroactive to the date of the divorce.<br />
A child born out of wedlock is entitled to child support retroactively to the date of<br />
birth, because it is upon the child’s birth that the parental duty of support<br />
commences.<br />
[T]he parental duty to support minor children can be enforced retroactively to the<br />
date of the divorce decree where a child is born in wedlock, the parents are<br />
subsequently divorced, but the divorce decree is silent on the issue of child support.<br />
67A C.J.S. Parent and <strong>Child</strong> 75 at 390 (1978)<br />
“While the right to child support may be barred by laches, an unreasonable delay in seeking<br />
support cannot waive the right of the child to support, or remove the obligation of the father to<br />
support the child”<br />
See Modification Issues.<br />
Review & Modification<br />
Same Sex Marriage/ Civil Union Related Issues<br />
§42-117. Marriage contracted out of state; when valid.<br />
All marriages contracted without this state, which would be valid by the laws of the country in<br />
which the same were contracted, shall be valid in all courts and places in this state.<br />
Source: R.S.1866, c. 34, § 17, p. 257; R.S.1913, § 1556; C.S.1922, § 1505; C.S.1929, § 42-117;<br />
R.S.1943, § 42-117.<br />
While many attorneys have long scoffed at child support law as being static and “boring”,<br />
we who practice in the area know that nothing could be further from the truth. Now, with a<br />
growing number of states† adopting same sex marriage laws or policies, including <strong>Nebraska</strong>’s<br />
neighboring State of Iowa, it is becoming clear that a whole new chapter is being written in the<br />
field of child support. This is an exciting time for child support and family law practitioners!<br />
Differences in state laws involving same sex marriages, separations and dissolutions will<br />
have to be addressed by child support offices nationwide, including here in <strong>Nebraska</strong>. The ink<br />
had barely dried on the new marriage rules in Iowa before one of our child support offices got a<br />
call from an attorney who has a client who pays support on a <strong>Nebraska</strong> child support order. He<br />
pays for his minor daughter, who planned on marrying her same sex partner in Iowa after she<br />
turns 18 years old. The inquiry was whether this marriage will serve to terminate the father’s<br />
ongoing child support obligation. Traditionally, when a minor child marries anywhere before<br />
- 161 -