Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$F:\Kevin\2007 Case Lists\Currently on web page\District Judges ...$



$\\orion\ChildSupport\Kevin\2007 Case Lists\Currently on web page ...$

medical assistance program under the Medical Assistance Act. Health care coverage cases may be modified within three years of entry of the order. (2) Orders that are not addressed under subsection (1) of this section shall not be reviewed by the department if it has not been three years since the present child support obligation was ordered unless the requesting party demonstrates a substantial change in circumstances that is expected to last for the applicable time period established by subdivision (1)(a) of this section. Such substantial change in circumstances may include, but is not limited to, change in employment, earning capacity, or income or receipt of an ongoing source of income from a pension, gift, or lottery winnings. An order may be reviewed after one year if the department’s determination after the previous review was not to refer to the county attorney or authorized attorney for filing of an application for modification because financial circumstances had not lasted or were not expected to last for the time periods established by subdivision (1)(a) of this section. Source: Laws 2010, LB712, § 25. §43-512.14. Title IV-D child support order; financial information; duty to provide; failure; effect; referral of order; effect. Each parent requesting review shall provide the financial information as provided in section 43-512.17 to the Department of Health and Human Services upon request of the department. The parent requesting review shall also provide an affidavit regarding the financial circumstances of the nonrequesting parent upon the request of the department. Failure by a nonrequesting parent to provide adequate financial information shall create a rebuttable presumption that such parent’s income has changed for purposes of section 43-512.12. …...Referral of an order to a county attorney or authorized attorney under this section shall create a rebuttable presumption that there has been a material change in financial circumstances of one of the parents such that the child support obligation shall be increased at least ten percent if there is inadequate financial information regarding the noncustodial parent or that the child support obligation shall be decreased at least ten percent if there is inadequate financial information regarding the custodial parent. Such referral shall also be sufficient to rebut the presumption specified in section 42-364.16, and the court, after notice and an opportunity to be heard, may order a decrease or an increase of at least ten percent in the child support obligation as provided in this section. Source: Laws 1991, LB 715, § 15; Laws 1993, LB 523, § 9; Laws 1996, LB 1044, § 165; Laws 1997, LB 307, § 66. §43-512.15. Title IV-D child support order; modification; when; procedures. (1) The county attorney or authorized attorney, upon referral from the Department of Health and Human Services, shall file a complaint to modify a child support order unless the attorney determines in the exercise of independent professional judgment that: (a) The variation from the Supreme Court child support guidelines pursuant to section 42-364.16 is based on material misrepresentation of fact concerning any financial information submitted to the attorney; (b) The variation from the guidelines is due to a voluntary reduction in net monthly income. For purposes of this section, a person who has been incarcerated for a period of one year or more in a county or city jail or a federal or state correctional facility shall be considered to have an involuntary reduction of income unless (i) the incarceration is a result of a conviction for criminal nonsupport pursuant to section 28-706 or a conviction for a violation of any federal law or law of another state substantially similar to section 28-706, (ii) the incarcerated individual has a documented record of willfully failing or neglecting to provide proper support which he or she knew or reasonably should have known he or she was legally obligated to provide when he or - 124 -
she had sufficient resources to provide such support; or (iii) the incarceration is a result of a conviction for a crime in which the child who is the subject of the child support order was victimized; or (c) When the amount of the order is considered with all the other undisputed facts in the case, no variation from the criteria set forth in subdivisions (1)(a) and (b) of section 43-512.12 exists. (2) The department, a county attorney, or an authorized attorney shall not in any case be responsible for reviewing or filing an application to modify child support for individuals incarcerated as described in subdivision (1)(b) of this section. (3) The proceedings to modify a child support order shall comply with section 42-364, and the county attorney or authorized attorney shall represent the state in the proceedings. (4) After a complaint to modify a child support order is filed, any party may choose to be represented personally by private counsel. Any party who retains private counsel shall so notify the county attorney or authorized attorney in writing. Source: Laws 2010, LB712, § 26 Practice Note: §42-358 (3) indicates that where the child support payment history shows that the obligated parent is in arrears, a prima facie case of contempt is made. Arguendo that should be all that is needed to shift the burden to the incarcerated parent to disprove that he or she was acting willfully or neglectfully with regard to their child support obligation at the time they walked (shackled) into prison. (Hat tip to Tyler Jacobsen in the Lancaster Co. Attorney’s office) See the Incarceration section of this outline for an update on changing case law in this area. §43-512.16 Title IV-D child support order; review of health care coverage provisions. The county attorney or authorized attorney shall review the health care coverage provisions contained in any child support order which is subject to review under section 43-512.12 and shall include in any application for modification a request that the court order health care coverage or cash medical support as provided in subsection (2) of section 42-369. Source: Laws 1991, LB 715, § 17; Laws 2009, LB288, § 12. Operative Date: September 30, 2009 §43-512.18. Title IV-D child support order; communication technology; use authorized. A court may use any available technology that would allow the parties to communicate with each other to conduct a hearing or any proceeding required pursuant to sections 43-512.12 to 43- 512.17. Source: Laws 1991, LB 715, § 19. REV. OCTOBER 28, 2008 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT MANUAL LETTER # 83-2008 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 466 NAC 8-000 Nebraska Administrative Code/Child Support > http://www.sos.ne.gov/rules-and-regs/regsearch/Rules/Health_and_Human_Services_System/Title-466/Chapter-08.pdf Note: this is pending modification to bring it in alignment with state law. As of August 2011 this has not occurred. 8-002 Criteria for a Review: All Nebraska IV-D court orders or foreign orders registered under UIFSA or RURESA in Nebraska are eligible for a review for possible modification of the child support amount and inclusion of health insurance if the following criteria are met: 1. The order is for current support; 2. The order is an active Nebraska order; 3. The order is not a tribal order; 4. The order is not an order registered for income withholding only; 5. At least one party resides in Nebraska; 6. Nebraska maintains continuing exclusive jurisdiction under UIFSA or is the proper state to acquire continuing exclusive jurisdiction under UIFSA for the support order; 7. The non-custodial party is not institutionalized or incarcerated; - 125 -
Page 1 and 2:
Have a Wonderful Summer! Child Supp
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents:* * (accessible v
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents (continued): Mult
Page 7 and 8:
A Note for Legal Practitioners: Mem
Page 9 and 10:
Overview/ IV-D Attorney Duty Gangwi
Page 11 and 12:
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-105(2) (Reissu
Page 13 and 14:
See Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248
Page 15 and 16:
their attorney of record and, excep
Page 17 and 18:
State ex rel. Lemon v. Gale, 272 Ne
Page 19 and 20:
disobedience as an essential elemen
Page 21 and 22:
student loan that the noncustodial
Page 23 and 24:
having jurisdiction to compel the s
Page 25 and 26:
Drew on Behalf of Reed v. Reed, 16
Page 27 and 28:
income, is to be considered in dete
Page 29 and 30:
§ 48-802 - Statutes, General Rules
Page 31 and 32:
from arriving on the scene, either
Page 33 and 34:
In equity cases trial judges should
Page 35 and 36:
Similarly, a party who does more th
Page 37 and 38:
Common Law Marriages States that au
Page 39 and 40:
Constitutional Issues/ Statutory In
Page 41 and 42:
Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1, 101
Page 43 and 44:
In re Interest of Thomas M., 282 Ne
Page 45 and 46:
See Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kre
Page 47 and 48:
Because a conditional commitment is
Page 49 and 50:
obligation when he currently has an
Page 51 and 52:
An order modifying child custody wh
Page 53 and 54:
Haynes v. Haynes, 205 Neb. 35, 286
Page 55 and 56:
Stuhr v. Stuhr, 240 Neb. 239, 481 N
Page 57 and 58:
By failing to take the genetic test
Page 59 and 60:
State on behalf of L.L.B. v. Hill,
Page 61 and 62:
Due Process Conn v. Conn, 13 Neb. A
Page 63 and 64:
or court order of emancipation or a
Page 65 and 66:
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 91
Page 67 and 68:
they have income. There is no floor
Page 69 and 70:
Lainson v. Lainson, 219 Neb. 170, 3
Page 71 and 72:
Millatmal v. Millatmal, 272 Neb. 45
Page 73 and 74:
24A Am. Jur. 2d Divorce and Separat
Page 75 and 76:
[T]he fact that [the custodial pare
Page 77 and 78:
The same principles that apply with
Page 79 and 80: “[C]oncerns regarding the stigma
Page 81 and 82: (a) The interpretation of the suppo
Page 83 and 84: make the appointment. In other case
Page 85 and 86: Guidelines Issues (Including suffic
Page 87 and 88: Note: In July 2008 the Federal Chil
Page 89 and 90: Erica J. v. Dewitt, 265 Neb. 728, 6
Page 91 and 92: Morrill County v. Darsaklis, 7 Neb.
Page 93 and 94: Any deviation from the guidelines m
Page 95 and 96: to also pay reimbursement for reaso
Page 97 and 98: or law of another state substantial
Page 99 and 100: §43-1711 Income, defined. Income s
Page 101 and 102: Simpson v. Simpson, 275 Neb. 152, 7
Page 103 and 104: §42-364.09. Child support; withhol
Page 105 and 106: §43-1709. Employer or other payor,
Page 107 and 108: (6) That the employer or other payo
Page 109 and 110: income withholding for current supp
Page 111 and 112: Title IV-D Division of the Departme
Page 113 and 114: Held: The state was acting beyond i
Page 115 and 116: (3) Any juvenile…whose parent, gu
Page 117 and 118: proceeding or a new action. Since t
Page 119 and 120: State, Dept. of Social Services v.
Page 121 and 122: amount equal to the support due and
Page 123 and 124: Source: Laws 1975, LB 212, § 8; La
Page 125 and 126: The second is used in aid of an exe
Page 127 and 128: Halsted v. Halsted, 169 Neb. 325, 9
Page 129: Neb. Ct. R. § 4-217 Modification.
Page 133 and 134: If applicable, earning capacity may
Page 135 and 136: Gress v. Gress, 274 Neb. 686, 743 N
Page 137 and 138: A district court may modify a regis
Page 139 and 140: Peter v. Peter, 262 Neb. 1017, 637
Page 141 and 142: See also: Wilkins v. Wilkins, 269 N
Page 143 and 144: Under certain circumstances, an ame
Page 145 and 146: A party seeking to modify a dissolu
Page 147 and 148: (2)The department, through its agen
Page 149 and 150: § 43-1408.01 Notarized acknowledgm
Page 151 and 152: §43-1414. Genetic testing; procedu
Page 153 and 154: Carlson v. Bartels, 143 Neb. 680, 1
Page 155 and 156: as to the paternity of the minor ch
Page 157 and 158: Jones v. Paulson, 261 Neb. 327, 622
Page 159 and 160: in loco parentis to the child. See,
Page 161 and 162: (b) If the court orders income with
Page 163 and 164: enforcement, for example, we are fo
Page 165 and 166: ights of visitation. Later mother c
Page 167 and 168: Matchett v. Dunkle, 244 Neb. 639, 5
Page 169 and 170: Connecticut, the District of Columb
Page 171 and 172: In order to stand in loco parentis,
Page 173 and 174: Of particular interest is the requi
Page 175 and 176: Social Security (Also see Equity, E
Page 177 and 178: Calculate support this way: 1. Mom
Page 179 and 180: Spousal support, when used in the c
Page 181 and 182:
punishment for sexual assault in th
Page 183 and 184:
Hall v. Hall, 238 Neb. 686, 472 N.W
Page 185 and 186:
interests of a child are served by
Page 187 and 188:
§42-722. Private counsel. An indiv
Page 189 and 190:
the following three conditions are
Page 191 and 192:
Source: Laws 1993, LB 500, § 43 §
Page 193 and 194:
Despite a basic difference in the n
Page 195 and 196:
Conrad v. Conrad, 208 Neb. 588, 304
Page 197 and 198:
Mace v. Mace, 13 Neb. App. 896, 703
Page 199 and 200:
In re Interest of Chance J., 279 Ne
Page 201 and 202:
per hour, two hour minimum. C. (1)
Page 203 and 204:
(3) If, regardless of whether payme
Page 205 and 206:
Rule 21 adopted April 16, 2008. Ren
Page 207 and 208:
Nebraska Information System (NIS):
Page 209 and 210:
web site: www.usmc-mccs.org/contact
Page 211 and 212:
FIPS FPLS IRG IV-D JUSTICE MSFIDM N
show all

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?