Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$F:\Kevin\2007 Case Lists\Currently on web page\District Judges ...$



$\\orion\ChildSupport\Kevin\2007 Case Lists\Currently on web page ...$

and wife, and whether the question arises directly by petition for an annulment or collaterally in other proceedings. Medicaid Reimbursement/ Medical Support (See also Health Insurance/Cash Medical Support) This area is in a state of flux. Nebraska’s DHHS CSE office released a letter in May 2008 which instructed local offices and CSE attorneys to stop seeking to obtain, or obtaining, new orders requiring Noncustodial Parents to repay Medicaid/medical debts to the state, and further to discontinue enforcement of existing orders for Medicaid reimbursement. This action was precipitated by the Federal HHS CSE office, which has ruled such enforcement activities are outside the Federal IV-D program mandates. Note: In response to a new federal definition of the term “reasonable in cost” as pertains to dependent health insurance or “cash medical support”, which definition was approved in July 2008 in the Federal Child Support Regulations, Nebraska’s HHS agency secured an amendment to our laws that defines “reasonably available” to equate to 3% or less of a parent’s gross monthly income. This change is contained in LB 288, effective 9/30/2009 (see § 42-369). Note: the concept of “cash medical support” only applies to “IV-D” cases at this time. The Feds have a broad view of what constitutes “cash medical support”. It can mean something as simple as ordering a parent to share uncovered medical expenses of the minor child. This is something routinely done in all cases except where the obligated parent has a very low income. Note also that “cash medical” awards cannot have the effect of putting the parent below the poverty guidelines as set forth in state and federal law. See the section on Guidelines Issues and Health Insurance in this outline for further information. State on Behalf of Dunn v. Wiegand, 2 Neb. App. 580, 512 N.W.2d 419 (1994) If action is filed on behalf of minor child by the state, the state cannot seek reimbursement by the father for medical expenses of the mother paid by the state if the child is more than 4 years of age. See also State v. Oglesby, 244 Neb. 880, 510 N.W.2d 53 (1994) “the trial court ordered judgment ‘for medical expenses incurred in relation to the pregnancy, confinement and recovery of [the mother] in the birth of [the child].’ That part of the judgment is not based on the rights of the child, but is in relation to the rights of the child’s mother. As such, it was barred by the applicable 4-year statute of limitations affecting the rights of the mother or the mother’s assignee. Section 43- 1411 does not extend the statute of limitations for anyone other than the minor child involved.” Modification Issues/ Change in Circumstances/Unclean Hands (see also Guidelines, Incarceration, Removal of Children, Unclean Hands) Full Nebraska Child Support Guidelines: - 122 -
Neb. Ct. R. § 4-217 Modification. Application of the child support guidelines which would result in a variation by 10 percent or more, but not less than $25, upward or downward, of the current child support obligation, child care obligation, or health care obligation, due to financial circumstances which have lasted 3 months and can reasonably be expected to last for an additional 6 months, establishes a rebuttable presumption of a material change of circumstances. Paragraph Q amended effective Jan. 1, 1996; Paragraph Q amended effective Sept. 1, 2002. … Neb. Ct. R. § 4-219 Limitation on Increase. Under no circumstances shall there be an increase in support due from an obligor solely because of an increase in the income of the obligee. Paragraph S effective Sept. 1, 2002. Neb. Ct. R. § 4-220 Limitation on Decrease. An obligor shall not be allowed a reduction in an existing support order solely because of the birth, adoption, or acknowledgement of subsequent children of the obligor; however, a duty to provide regular support for subsequent children may be raised as a defense to an action for an upward modification of such existing support order. Paragraph T effective Sept. 1, 2002. § 42-364. Action involving child support, child custody, parenting time, visitation, or other access; parenting plan; legal custody and physical custody determination; rights of parents; child support; termination of parental rights; court; duties; modification proceedings; use of school records as evidence. (1) . . . . . . (6) Modification proceedings relating to support, custody, parenting time, visitation, other access, or removal of children from the jurisdiction of the court shall be commenced by filing a complaint to modify. . . . Service of process and other procedure shall comply with the requirements for a dissolution action. [See § 42-352] (7) . . . Source: Laws 1983, LB 138, § 1; Laws 1985, LB 612, § 1; Laws 1985, Second Spec. Sess., LB 7, § 16; Laws 1991, LB 457, § 3; Laws 1991, LB 715, § 1; Laws 1993, LB 629, § 21; Laws 1994, LB 490, § 1; Laws 1996, LB 1296, § 15; Laws 1997, LB 752, § 96; Laws 2004, LB 1207, § 25; Laws 2006, LB 1113, § 35; Laws 2007, LB554, § 32; Laws 2008, LB1014, § 32; Laws 2009, LB288, § 5; Laws 2010, LB901, § 1. Operative Date: July 1, 2010 §43-512.12 Title IV-D child support order; review by Department of Health and Human Services; when. (Note: LB 712 amends portions of this statute. New language is highlighted) (1) Child support orders in cases in which a party has applied for services under Title IV-D of the federal Social Security Act, as amended, shall be reviewed by the Department of Health and Human Services to determine whether to refer such orders to the county attorney or authorized attorney for filing of an application for modification. An order shall be reviewed by the department upon its own initiative or at the request of either parent when such review is required by Title IV-D of the federal Social Security Act, as amended. After review the department shall refer an order to a county attorney or authorized attorney when the verifiable financial information available to the department indicates: (a) The present child support obligation varies from the Supreme Court child support guidelines pursuant to section 42-364.16 by more than the percentage, amount, or other criteria established by Supreme Court rule, and the variation is due to financial circumstances which have lasted at least three months and can reasonably be expected to last for an additional six months; or (b) Health care coverage meeting the requirements of subsection (2) of section 42-369 is available to either party and the children do not have health insurance coverage other than the - 123 -
Page 1 and 2:
Have a Wonderful Summer! Child Supp
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents:* * (accessible v
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents (continued): Mult
Page 7 and 8:
A Note for Legal Practitioners: Mem
Page 9 and 10:
Overview/ IV-D Attorney Duty Gangwi
Page 11 and 12:
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-105(2) (Reissu
Page 13 and 14:
See Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248
Page 15 and 16:
their attorney of record and, excep
Page 17 and 18:
State ex rel. Lemon v. Gale, 272 Ne
Page 19 and 20:
disobedience as an essential elemen
Page 21 and 22:
student loan that the noncustodial
Page 23 and 24:
having jurisdiction to compel the s
Page 25 and 26:
Drew on Behalf of Reed v. Reed, 16
Page 27 and 28:
income, is to be considered in dete
Page 29 and 30:
§ 48-802 - Statutes, General Rules
Page 31 and 32:
from arriving on the scene, either
Page 33 and 34:
In equity cases trial judges should
Page 35 and 36:
Similarly, a party who does more th
Page 37 and 38:
Common Law Marriages States that au
Page 39 and 40:
Constitutional Issues/ Statutory In
Page 41 and 42:
Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1, 101
Page 43 and 44:
In re Interest of Thomas M., 282 Ne
Page 45 and 46:
See Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kre
Page 47 and 48:
Because a conditional commitment is
Page 49 and 50:
obligation when he currently has an
Page 51 and 52:
An order modifying child custody wh
Page 53 and 54:
Haynes v. Haynes, 205 Neb. 35, 286
Page 55 and 56:
Stuhr v. Stuhr, 240 Neb. 239, 481 N
Page 57 and 58:
By failing to take the genetic test
Page 59 and 60:
State on behalf of L.L.B. v. Hill,
Page 61 and 62:
Due Process Conn v. Conn, 13 Neb. A
Page 63 and 64:
or court order of emancipation or a
Page 65 and 66:
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 91
Page 67 and 68:
they have income. There is no floor
Page 69 and 70:
Lainson v. Lainson, 219 Neb. 170, 3
Page 71 and 72:
Millatmal v. Millatmal, 272 Neb. 45
Page 73 and 74:
24A Am. Jur. 2d Divorce and Separat
Page 75 and 76:
[T]he fact that [the custodial pare
Page 77 and 78: The same principles that apply with
Page 79 and 80: “[C]oncerns regarding the stigma
Page 81 and 82: (a) The interpretation of the suppo
Page 83 and 84: make the appointment. In other case
Page 85 and 86: Guidelines Issues (Including suffic
Page 87 and 88: Note: In July 2008 the Federal Chil
Page 89 and 90: Erica J. v. Dewitt, 265 Neb. 728, 6
Page 91 and 92: Morrill County v. Darsaklis, 7 Neb.
Page 93 and 94: Any deviation from the guidelines m
Page 95 and 96: to also pay reimbursement for reaso
Page 97 and 98: or law of another state substantial
Page 99 and 100: §43-1711 Income, defined. Income s
Page 101 and 102: Simpson v. Simpson, 275 Neb. 152, 7
Page 103 and 104: §42-364.09. Child support; withhol
Page 105 and 106: §43-1709. Employer or other payor,
Page 107 and 108: (6) That the employer or other payo
Page 109 and 110: income withholding for current supp
Page 111 and 112: Title IV-D Division of the Departme
Page 113 and 114: Held: The state was acting beyond i
Page 115 and 116: (3) Any juvenile…whose parent, gu
Page 117 and 118: proceeding or a new action. Since t
Page 119 and 120: State, Dept. of Social Services v.
Page 121 and 122: amount equal to the support due and
Page 123 and 124: Source: Laws 1975, LB 212, § 8; La
Page 125 and 126: The second is used in aid of an exe
Page 127: Halsted v. Halsted, 169 Neb. 325, 9
Page 131 and 132: she had sufficient resources to pro
Page 133 and 134: If applicable, earning capacity may
Page 135 and 136: Gress v. Gress, 274 Neb. 686, 743 N
Page 137 and 138: A district court may modify a regis
Page 139 and 140: Peter v. Peter, 262 Neb. 1017, 637
Page 141 and 142: See also: Wilkins v. Wilkins, 269 N
Page 143 and 144: Under certain circumstances, an ame
Page 145 and 146: A party seeking to modify a dissolu
Page 147 and 148: (2)The department, through its agen
Page 149 and 150: § 43-1408.01 Notarized acknowledgm
Page 151 and 152: §43-1414. Genetic testing; procedu
Page 153 and 154: Carlson v. Bartels, 143 Neb. 680, 1
Page 155 and 156: as to the paternity of the minor ch
Page 157 and 158: Jones v. Paulson, 261 Neb. 327, 622
Page 159 and 160: in loco parentis to the child. See,
Page 161 and 162: (b) If the court orders income with
Page 163 and 164: enforcement, for example, we are fo
Page 165 and 166: ights of visitation. Later mother c
Page 167 and 168: Matchett v. Dunkle, 244 Neb. 639, 5
Page 169 and 170: Connecticut, the District of Columb
Page 171 and 172: In order to stand in loco parentis,
Page 173 and 174: Of particular interest is the requi
Page 175 and 176: Social Security (Also see Equity, E
Page 177 and 178: Calculate support this way: 1. Mom
Page 179 and 180:
Spousal support, when used in the c
Page 181 and 182:
punishment for sexual assault in th
Page 183 and 184:
Hall v. Hall, 238 Neb. 686, 472 N.W
Page 185 and 186:
interests of a child are served by
Page 187 and 188:
§42-722. Private counsel. An indiv
Page 189 and 190:
the following three conditions are
Page 191 and 192:
Source: Laws 1993, LB 500, § 43 §
Page 193 and 194:
Despite a basic difference in the n
Page 195 and 196:
Conrad v. Conrad, 208 Neb. 588, 304
Page 197 and 198:
Mace v. Mace, 13 Neb. App. 896, 703
Page 199 and 200:
In re Interest of Chance J., 279 Ne
Page 201 and 202:
per hour, two hour minimum. C. (1)
Page 203 and 204:
(3) If, regardless of whether payme
Page 205 and 206:
Rule 21 adopted April 16, 2008. Ren
Page 207 and 208:
Nebraska Information System (NIS):
Page 209 and 210:
web site: www.usmc-mccs.org/contact
Page 211 and 212:
FIPS FPLS IRG IV-D JUSTICE MSFIDM N
show all

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?