Evolution of mortality worldwide in the age class 75-84 y
Evolution of mortality worldwide in the age class 75-84 y
Evolution of mortality worldwide in the age class 75-84 y
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>mortality</strong><br />
<strong>worldwide</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>age</strong> <strong>class</strong><br />
<strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> y<br />
H. Kesteloot<br />
Dept. <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology, K.U.Leuven<br />
HK2004
Mortality rates (/100.000/yr) mean <strong>of</strong> 3 last available years mostly from <strong>the</strong><br />
years 1997-1999. Age-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> years.<br />
MEN Country All-causes TCV Total cancer AC-TCV-TCA<br />
HK2004<br />
1 Japan 6181 1996 1941 2244<br />
2 France 6497 2260 1955 2282<br />
3 Australia 6688 2940 1886 1863<br />
4 Switzerland 6916 3016 1<strong>84</strong>0 2060<br />
5 USA 6997 3086 1<strong>75</strong>5 2157<br />
6 Canada 7087 2960 1927 2201<br />
7 Italy 7149 3136 2019 1994<br />
8 Spa<strong>in</strong> 7157 2602 1957 2599<br />
9 Sweden 7166 3725 1721 1721<br />
10 Greece 7198 3721 1<strong>75</strong>8 1719<br />
11 Austria 7208 4036 1<strong>84</strong>2 1329<br />
12 New Zealand 7286 3459 1902 1925<br />
13 Norway 7890 3817 1991 2083<br />
14 Germany 7897 4008 1994 1895<br />
15 Luxembourg 8027 3531 2260 2235<br />
16 England & Wales 8067 3580 2051 2437<br />
17 F<strong>in</strong>land 8248 4038 1809 2402<br />
18 Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 8352 3262 2367 2723<br />
19 Belgium <strong>84</strong>82 3306 2427 2749<br />
20 N. Ireland 8559 3963 2034 2562<br />
21 Denmark 8600 3611 2193 2796<br />
22 Argent<strong>in</strong>a 8782 4116 16<strong>75</strong> 2991<br />
23 Scotland 8883 4072 2297 2515<br />
24 Portugal 9080 3896 1805 3378<br />
25 Lithuania 9172 5706 1947 1520<br />
26 Chili 9486 3456 1957 4073<br />
27 Ch<strong>in</strong>a (rural) 9648 3939 1142 4567<br />
28 Ch<strong>in</strong>a (urban) 9660 4465 1821 3374<br />
29 Poland 9835 5570 1900 2365<br />
30 Ireland 9950 4597 2215 3138<br />
31 Latvia 9999 6542 1825 1633<br />
32 Estonia 10078 6511 1947 1620<br />
33 Hungary 10732 6249 2489 1995<br />
34 Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 11238 8296 1154 1788<br />
35 Russian Fed. 11574 7916 1561 2097
Mortality rates (/100.000/yr) mean <strong>of</strong> 3 last available years mostly from <strong>the</strong> years<br />
1997-1999. Age-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> years.<br />
WOMEN Country All-causes TCV Total Cancer AC-TCV-TCA<br />
HK2004<br />
1 Japan 3233 1279 821 1134<br />
2 France 3554 1341 <strong>84</strong>1 1372<br />
3 Switzerland 3981 1<strong>84</strong>1 887 1252<br />
4 Australia 4110 1961 961 1188<br />
5 Spa<strong>in</strong> 4210 1917 796 1497<br />
6 Canada 4241 1823 1058 1360<br />
7 Sweden 4276 2194 948 1134<br />
8 Italy 4365 2189 958 1217<br />
9 Luxembourg 4559 2217 1039 1302<br />
10 Norway 4566 2243 980 1343<br />
11 New Zealand 4573 2189 1126 1258<br />
12 USA 4630 2099 1035 1496<br />
13 Austria 4640 2803 1016 821<br />
14 Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 4689 1934 1052 1703<br />
15 Belgium 4795 2191 1034 1570<br />
16 F<strong>in</strong>land 4942 2498 927 1517<br />
17 Germany 4965 2722 1089 1154<br />
18 England & Wales 5185 2356 1144 1685<br />
19 Denmark 5316 2168 1263 18<strong>84</strong><br />
20 Argent<strong>in</strong>a 5396 2760 896 1741<br />
21 N. Ireland 5508 2696 1145 1667<br />
22 Greece 5514 3389 850 12<strong>75</strong><br />
23 Portugal 5709 2921 835 1954<br />
24 Scotland 5897 2729 1398 1771<br />
25 Chili 6167 2424 1180 2563<br />
26 Lithuania 6190 4624 888 678<br />
27 Ireland 6261 3082 1234 1945<br />
28 Ch<strong>in</strong>a (rural) 6525 2769 608 3148<br />
29 Estonia 6664 4853 907 903<br />
30 Poland 6693 4188 956 1550<br />
31 Ch<strong>in</strong>a (urban) 6801 3395 929 2477<br />
32 Latvia 6834 4910 915 1009<br />
33 Hungary 7332 4772 1316 1244<br />
34 Russian Fed. 8128 6190 741 1197<br />
35 Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 8278 6794 522 962
Ln Mortality rate vs Age (mean <strong>of</strong> 3 LAY (1997-99))<br />
Age range 35-<strong>84</strong> y<br />
Gompertz – Men<br />
Country Intercept Age (y) ML R²<br />
Japan 1.192 0.095 109.0 0.9993<br />
Australia 1.118 0.096 108.1 0.9925<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 1.908 0.087 110.7 0.9932<br />
Canada 1.355 0.094 107.7 0.9969<br />
USA 2.215 0.083 111.4 0.99<strong>84</strong><br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 2.016 0.087 108.6 0.9973<br />
England & Wales 0.924 0.102 104.1 0.9993<br />
Denmark 1.581 0.094 105.5 0.9982<br />
Hungary 3.478 0.073 109.2 0.9943<br />
Russian Fed. 4.291 0.064 112.7 0.9996<br />
R²: determ<strong>in</strong>ation coefficient; ML: extrapolated maximum life expectancy<br />
HK2004
Ln Mortality rate vs Age (mean <strong>of</strong> 3 LAY (1997-99))<br />
Age range 35-<strong>84</strong> y<br />
Gompertz – Women<br />
Country Intercept Age (y) ML R²<br />
Japan 0.565 0.093 117.8 0.9914<br />
Australia 0.512 0.097 113.2 0.9952<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 0.517 0.096 114.6 0.9816<br />
Canada 0.703 0.096 112.7 0.9992<br />
USA 1.344 0.089 114.0 0.9990<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 0.631 0.097 112.1 0.9872<br />
England & Wales 0.532 0.100 109.1 0.9991<br />
Denmark 1.072 0.094 110.0 0.9991<br />
Hungary 1.<strong>84</strong>7 0.088 110.3 0.9939<br />
Russian Fed. 1.966 0.088 108.8 0.9968<br />
R²: determ<strong>in</strong>ation coefficient; ML: extrapolated maximum life expectancy<br />
HK2004
Mortality rates per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr, mean <strong>of</strong> 3 latest<br />
available years (1997-99); MEN<br />
Country AC TCV IHD CVA TCA RES<br />
Japan 6181 1996 499 952 1941 2244<br />
Australia 6688 2940 1726 625 1886 1863<br />
USA 6997 3086 1661 478 1<strong>75</strong>5 2157<br />
Canada 7087 2960 1737 544 1927 2201<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 7157 2602 928 761 1957 2599<br />
England & Wales 8067 3580 2097 7<strong>75</strong> 2051 2437<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 8248 4038 2590 886 1809 2402<br />
Denmark 8600 3611 1877 800 2193 2796<br />
Hungary 10732 6249 2716 1<strong>75</strong>9 2489 1995<br />
Russian Fed. 11574 7916 3819 3076 1561 2097<br />
AC: all causes; TCA: total cancer; RES: AC-TCV-TCA<br />
HK2004
Mortality rates per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr, mean <strong>of</strong> 3 latest<br />
available years (1997-99); WOMEN<br />
Country AC TCV IHD CVA TCA RES<br />
Japan 3233 1279 305 596 821 1134<br />
Australia 4110 1961 998 535 961 1188<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 4210 1917 503 635 796 1497<br />
Canada 4241 1823 961 421 1058 1360<br />
USA 4630 2099 986 421 1035 1496<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 4942 2498 1425 700 927 1517<br />
England & Wales 5185 2356 1152 690 1144 1685<br />
Denmark 5316 2168 986 604 1263 18<strong>84</strong><br />
Hungary 7332 4772 1916 13<strong>84</strong> 1316 1244<br />
Russian Fed. 8128 6190 2676 2700 741 1197<br />
AC: all causes; TCA: total cancer; RES: AC-TCV-TCA<br />
HK2004
Ln Mortality rate vs Age, Age² (mean <strong>of</strong> 3 LAY (1997-99))<br />
Age range 35-<strong>84</strong> y<br />
2 nd degree polynomial – Men<br />
Country Intercept Age (y) Age² R²<br />
Japan 1.510 0.083 0.935x10 -4 * 0.9994<br />
Australia 2.919 0.032* 0.531x10 -3 0.9973<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 3.701 0.023 0.528x10 -3 0.9991<br />
Canada 2.327 0.060 0.287x10 -3 0.99<strong>84</strong><br />
USA 2.903 0.059 0.203x10 -3 0.9993<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 3.135 0.048 0.330x10 -3 0.9996<br />
England & Wales 1.271 0.089 0.102x10 -3 * 0.9994<br />
Denmark 2.080 0.076 0.147x10 -3 * 0.9986<br />
Hungary 2.592 0.105 -0.261x10 -3 * 0.9963<br />
Russian Fed. 4.147 0.069 -0.424x10 -4 * 0.9996<br />
R²: determ<strong>in</strong>ation coefficient;<br />
*: not significant at <strong>the</strong> p < 0.05 level<br />
HK2004
Ln Mortality rate vs Age, Age² (mean <strong>of</strong> 3 LAY (1997-99))<br />
Age range 35-<strong>84</strong> y<br />
2 nd degree polynomial – Women<br />
Country Intercept Age (y) Age² R²<br />
Japan 2.469 0.025* 0.561x10 -3 0.9972<br />
Australia 2.280 0.035 0.521x10 -3 0.9998<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 3.999 -0.027 0.103x10 -2 0.9996<br />
Canada 1.287 0.0<strong>75</strong> 0.172x10 -3 0.9997<br />
USA 1.913 0.069 0.168x10 -3 0.9996<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 3.083 0.010* 0.723x10 -3 0.9960<br />
England & Wales 1.292 0.074 0.224x10 -3 0.9999<br />
Denmark 0.792 0.105 -0.824x10 -4 * 0.9993<br />
Hungary 3.140 0.042 0.381x10 -3 0.9969<br />
Russian Fed. 3.238 0.043 0.3<strong>75</strong>x10 -3 0.9997<br />
R²: determ<strong>in</strong>ation coefficient;<br />
*: not significant at <strong>the</strong> p < 0.05 level<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> ALL-CAUSE <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); MEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P %Diff/y<br />
Japan 30 0.962 10819 -176.4 -26.57 # -1.63<br />
Australia 30 0.949 11<strong>75</strong>7 -183.7 -22.82 # -1.56<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.930 10669 -143.5 -18.89 # -1.34<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.954 12380 -146.8 -24.01 # -1.19<br />
England&Wales 30 0.965 12182 -143.8 -27.95 # -1.18<br />
USA 29 0.945 9774 -102.2 -21.45 # -1.05<br />
Canada 28 0.962 9493 -91.5 -25.82 # -0.96<br />
Hungary 31 0.607 12897 -64.9 -6.69 # -0.50<br />
Denmark 29 0.421 9586 -27.0 -4.43 *** -0.28<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.001 11889 -3.2 -0.15 NS -0.03<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> ALL-CAUSE <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); WOMEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
Japan 30 0.9<strong>75</strong> 7838 -1<strong>75</strong>.1 -32.87 # -2.23<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.959 8032 -152.1 -25.22 # -1.89<br />
Australia 30 0.915 7323 -121.8 -17.39 # -1.66<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.904 8748 -142.3 -16.21 # -1.63<br />
Canada 28 0.935 5916 -71.4 -19.26 # -1.21<br />
England & Wales 30 0.961 <strong>75</strong>18 -89.9 -26.37 # -1.20<br />
USA 29 0.809 6034 -61.6 -10.70 # -1.02<br />
Hungary 31 0.910 9695 -79.2 -17.10 # -0.82<br />
Denmark 29 0.791 6551 -51.6 -10.11 # -0.79<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.103 7814 18.4 1.40 NS 0.24<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> All-Cause <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> years, MEN<br />
<strong>Evolution</strong> 1970-LAY (1997-2000)<br />
HK2004<br />
Country N R² Intercept Slope T P %Diff/y<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gapore 30 0.878 14349 -267.4 -14.20 # -1.86<br />
Japan 30 0.962 10819 -176.4 -26.57 # -1.63<br />
Australia 30 0.949 11<strong>75</strong>7 -183.7 -22.82 # -1.56<br />
Austria 31 0.960 12<strong>75</strong>7 -186.4 -26.53 # -1.46<br />
Hong Kong 27 0.810 9833 -138.9 -10.31 # -1.41<br />
France 29 0.958 10303 -144.8 -24.68 # -1.41<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.930 10669 -143.5 -18.89 # -1.34<br />
Portugal 30 0.797 13633 -181.8 -10.49 # -1.33<br />
Germany 30 0.940 12617 -156.2 -21.01 # -1.24<br />
Italy 28 0.918 10940 -134.7 -17.11 # -1.23<br />
New Zealand 29 0.893 114<strong>84</strong> -139.8 -14.99 # -1.22<br />
Switzerland 28 0.981 10154 -122.6 -36.52 # -1.21<br />
Luxembourg 31 0.802 12706 -153.3 -10.<strong>84</strong> # -1.21<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.954 12380 -146.8 -24.01 # -1.19<br />
England & Wales 30 0.965 12182 -143.8 -27.95 # -1.18<br />
Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland 30 0.877 12804 -146.0 -14.13 # -1.14<br />
Belgium 31 0.941 119<strong>84</strong> -133.4 -21.58 # -1.11<br />
USA 29 0.945 9774 -102.2 -21.45 # -1.05<br />
Scotland 31 0.906 13001 -134.3 -16.73 # -1.03<br />
Canada 28 0.962 9493 -91.5 -25.82 # -0.96<br />
Sweden 29 0.898 9888 -91.5 -15.42 # -0.93<br />
Estonia 17 0.649 12089 -100.1 -5.27 # -0.83<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a urban 13 0.257 10697 -76.9 -1.95 NS -0.72<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a rural 13 0.235 10524 -74.0 -1.<strong>84</strong> NS -0.70<br />
Chili 24 0.614 11639 -74.4 -5.92 # -0.64<br />
Ireland 28 0.655 12104 -72.7 -7.02 # -0.60<br />
Norway 29 0.861 9546 -52.1 -12.95 # -0.55<br />
Argent<strong>in</strong>a 20 0.360 10162 -52.0 -3.18 ** -0.51<br />
Hungary 31 0.607 12897 -64.9 -6.69 # -0.50<br />
Greece 29 0.774 <strong>84</strong>04 -40.2 -9.61 # -0.48<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 30 0.<strong>75</strong>4 9718 -38.8 -9.26 # -0.40<br />
Poland 30 0.405 11768 -46.5 -4.36 *** -0.40<br />
Latvia 21 0.164 11388 -36.3 -1.93 NS -0.32<br />
Denmark 29 0.421 9586 -27.0 -4.43 *** -0.28<br />
Korea 16 0.029 9888 -27.3 -0.64 NS -0.28<br />
Russian Fed. 19 0.001 11889 -3.2 -0.15 NS -0.03<br />
Lithuania 18 0.001 9328 -2.3 -0.15 NS -0.02<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 18 0.160 11005 36.2 1.<strong>75</strong> NS 0.33<br />
* p
Slope <strong>of</strong> All-Cause <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> years, WOMEN<br />
<strong>Evolution</strong> 1970-LAY (1997-2000)<br />
HK2004<br />
Country N R² Intercept Slope T P %Diff/y<br />
Japan 30 0.9<strong>75</strong> 7838 -1<strong>75</strong>.1 -32.87 # -2.23<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.959 8032 -152.1 -25.22 # -1.89<br />
Switzerland 28 0.962 7094 -130.5 -25.74 # -1.<strong>84</strong><br />
France 29 0.981 6529 -117.4 -36.96 # -1.80<br />
Luxembourg 31 0.936 9136 -164.1 -20.62 # -1.80<br />
Portugal 30 0.895 10366 -182.2 -15.49 # -1.76<br />
Italy 28 0.9<strong>75</strong> 7999 -140.1 -32.12 # -1.<strong>75</strong><br />
Belgium 31 0.980 <strong>84</strong>33 -143.2 -37.27 # -1.69<br />
Austria 31 0.990 8988 -151.2 -53.10 # -1.68<br />
Australia 30 0.915 7323 -121.8 -17.39 # -1.66<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.904 8748 -142.3 -16.21 # -1.63<br />
Germany 30 0.990 8999 -144.8 -52.90 # -1.61<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gapore 30 0.920 8877 -133.0 -17.90 # -1.50<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a urban 13 0.780 8024 -114.8 -6.25 # -1.43<br />
Sweden 29 0.981 6789 -96.0 -37.50 # -1.41<br />
Argent<strong>in</strong>a 20 0.787 7747 -108.1 -8.15 # -1.39<br />
New Zealand 29 0.936 7331 -101.8 -19.80 # -1.39<br />
Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland 30 0.929 8636 -119.2 -19.21 # -1.38<br />
Ireland 28 0.936 9096 -115.0 -19.44 # -1.26<br />
Norway 29 0.955 6801 -85.5 -24.07 # -1.26<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 30 0.<strong>84</strong>5 6710 -<strong>84</strong>.3 -12.34 # -1.26<br />
Hong Kong 27 0.789 6059 -<strong>75</strong>.3 -9.68 # -1.24<br />
Chili 24 0.711 8857 -107.9 -7.36 # -1.21<br />
Canada 28 0.935 5916 -71.4 -19.26 # -1.21<br />
England & Wales 30 0.961 <strong>75</strong>18 -89.9 -26.37 # -1.20<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a rural 13 0.704 7346 -82.9 -5.11 *** -1.13<br />
Estonia 17 0.790 <strong>84</strong>35 -94.5 7.52 # -1.12<br />
USA 29 0.809 6034 -61.6 -10.70 # -1.02<br />
Scotland 31 0.939 8122 -80.5 -21.04 # -0.99<br />
Greece 29 0.883 7258 -61.8 -14.28 # -0.85<br />
Hungary 31 0.910 9695 -79.2 -17.10 # -0.82<br />
Denmark 29 0.791 6551 -51.6 -10.11 # -0.79<br />
Latvia 21 0.625 7997 -53.8 -5.63 # -0.67<br />
Poland 30 0.<strong>75</strong>9 8396 -52.9 -9.38 # -0.63<br />
Lithuania 18 0.297 6659 -23.4 -2.60 * -0.35<br />
Russian Fed. 19 0.103 7814 18.4 1.40 NS 0.24<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 18 0.368 7673 47.9 3.05 ** 0.62<br />
Korea 16 0.208 5426 49.3 1.92 NS 0.91<br />
* p
Slope <strong>of</strong> TCV <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); MEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
Japan 30 0.981 5950 -151.1 -38.32 # -2.54<br />
Australia 30 0.969 7311 -161.3 -29.41 # -2.21<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.979 5676 -118.3 -35.59 # -2.08<br />
USA 29 0.977 6233 -122.3 -33.82 # -1.96<br />
Canada 28 0.983 5742 -112.0 -38.65 # -1.95<br />
England & Wales 30 0.988 6524 -102.5 -47.69 # -1.57<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.969 7225 -108.9 -29.62 # -1.51<br />
Denmark 29 0.916 5822 -71.2 -17.14 # -1.22<br />
Hungary 31 0.839 7994 -55.8 -12.28 # -0.70<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.164 8516 -29.5 -1.83 NS -0.35<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> TCV <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); WOMEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
Japan 30 0.9<strong>84</strong> 4554 -123.0 -40.12 # -2.70<br />
Australia 30 0.960 5252 -123.2 -26.04 # -2.35<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.986 4794 -108.8 -44.11 # -2.27<br />
Canada 28 0.983 3941 -86.9 -39.02 # -2.21<br />
USA 28 0.949 4288 -89.1 -22.53 # -2.08<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.956 5780 -116.9 -24.80 # -2.02<br />
England & Wales 30 0.988 4665 -<strong>84</strong>.5 -48.55 # -1.81<br />
Denmark 29 0.959 4103 -69.4 -25.06 # -1.69<br />
Hungary 31 0.939 6702 -65.3 -21.09 # -0.97<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.130 6456 -17.2 -1.60 NS -0.27<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> IHD <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); MEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
USA 29 0.962 4080 -96.6 -26.24 # -2.37<br />
Canada 28 0.983 3611 -74.7 -39.07 # -2.07<br />
Australia 30 0.971 4047 -82.0 -30.74 # -2.03<br />
Denmark 29 0.893 3951 -65.7 -15.02 # -1.66<br />
Japan 30 0.<strong>84</strong>4 792 -11.7 -12.31 # -1.48<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.671 4717 -55.2 -5.89 *** -1.17<br />
England & Wales 30 0.838 3346 -36.6 -12.02 # -1.09<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.539 3460 -21.1 -5.72 # -0.61<br />
Hungary 31 0.071 2736 -5.5 -1.48 NS -0.20<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.009 940 -0.7 -0.50 NS -0.08<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> IHD <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); WOMEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
USA 29 0.938 2631 -67.6 -20.27 # -2.57<br />
Canada 28 0.986 2266 -52.8 -42.12 # -2.33<br />
Denmark 29 0.969 2448 -50.8 -29.01 # -2.07<br />
Australia 30 0.960 2421 -49.5 -25.87 # -2.04<br />
Japan 30 0.854 554 -9.5 -12.81 # -1.71<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.745 3410 -47.5 -7.04 # -1.39<br />
England & Wales 30 0.898 1945 -24.2 -15.68 # -1.25<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.695 2136 -18.4 -7.99 # -0.86<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.324 619 -4.1 -3.60 ** -0.67<br />
Hungary 31 0.210 2029 -10.8 -2.77 ** -0.53<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> CVA <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); MEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
Japan 30 0.930 3579 -109.7 -19.34 # -3.06<br />
USA 29 0.901 1247 -33.1 -15.71 # -2.66<br />
Australia 30 0.942 1851 -47.5 -21.37 # -2.56<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.945 2223 -54.2 -21.53 # -2.44<br />
Canada 28 0.940 1197 -28.4 -20.17 # -2.37<br />
England & Wales 30 0.976 1710 -33.4 -33.57 # -1.95<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.871 1740 -29.5 -13.73 # -1.70<br />
Denmark 29 0.832 1154 -13.2 -11.57 # -1.14<br />
Hungary 31 0.427 2294 -16.2 -4.65 # -0.71<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.148 2960 8.8 1.72 NS 0.30<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> CVA <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr,<br />
1970-(1997-2000); WOMEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
Japan 30 0.951 2692 -<strong>84</strong>.6 -23.43 # -3.14<br />
Australia 30 0.939 1765 -48.5 -20.83 # -2.<strong>75</strong><br />
USA 29 0.8<strong>84</strong> 1047 -27.7 -14.37 # -2.65<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.942 2018 -50.8 -20.90 # -2.52<br />
Canada 28 0.939 1002 -25.2 -19.96 # -2.52<br />
England & Wales 30 0.982 1541 -31.3 -39.50 # -2.03<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.857 1639 -32.9 -12.93 # -2.01<br />
Denmark 29 0.815 989 -15.1 -10.92 # -1.53<br />
Hungary 31 0.622 2069 -20.5 -6.90 # -0.99<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.401 2443 13.2 3.37 ** 0.54<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> TOTAL CANCER <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted<br />
<strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr, 1970-(1997-2000); MEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.455 2197 -10.4 -4.<strong>84</strong> # -0.47<br />
England & Wales 30 0.032 2170 2.2 0.96 NS 0.10<br />
Australia 30 0.229 1876 4.2 2.88 ** 0.22<br />
Canada 28 0.568 1814 8.2 5.<strong>84</strong> # 0.45<br />
USA 29 0.557 1654 8.2 5.83 # 0.50<br />
Hungary 31 0.647 2138 12.3 7.29 # 0.58<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.477 1448 11.8 3.94 ** 0.81<br />
Denmark 29 0.533 1920 15.9 5.55 # 0.83<br />
Japan 30 0.918 1450 19.2 17.73 # 1.33<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.957 1468 19.7 24.40 # 1.34<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
Slope <strong>of</strong> TOTAL CANCER <strong>mortality</strong> per 100,000/yr, <strong>age</strong>-adjusted<br />
<strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> yr, 1970-(1997-2000); WOMEN<br />
Country N R² A B T P % Diff/y<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 30 0.815 1115 -6.7 -11.10 # -0.60<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 29 0.383 <strong>84</strong>7 -1.8 -4.09 *** -0.22<br />
Japan 30 0.037 828 0.5 1.04 NS 0.06<br />
Denmark 29 0.202 1214 1.8 2.62 * 0.15<br />
Hungary 31 0.198 1252 2.0 2.67 * 0.16<br />
Australia 30 0.307 916 2.1 3.52 ** 0.23<br />
Canada 28 0.621 950 3.9 6.53 # 0.41<br />
England & Wales 30 0.787 1015 6.0 10.19 # 0.59<br />
Russian Fed. (80) 19 0.697 663 6.1 6.25 # 0.92<br />
USA 29 0.922 831 7.8 17.85 # 0.94<br />
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; # p < 0.0001; NS: not significant<br />
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
HK2004
Relationship between <strong>mortality</strong> and <strong>age</strong> (1)<br />
• Age is <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant force <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>mortality</strong> rates with <strong>age</strong> <strong>worldwide</strong>.<br />
• The relationship between ln <strong>mortality</strong> rates and <strong>age</strong> can be<br />
expressed by simple regression equations [Gompertz equations<br />
(r²>0.99)] or second-degree polynomial equations (r² > 0.99).<br />
• The fit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> equations is equally good <strong>in</strong> both sexes and is<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>mortality</strong> between<br />
populations.<br />
• Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>mortality</strong> rates (both decreases and <strong>in</strong>creases) at <strong>the</strong><br />
population level concern <strong>the</strong> whole population <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>age</strong> range 35-<br />
<strong>84</strong> y.<br />
HK2004
Relationship between <strong>mortality</strong> and <strong>age</strong> (2)<br />
• A highly significant correlation exists between <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercept and<br />
<strong>the</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gompertz equations. This po<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong><br />
a cross<strong>in</strong>g-over <strong>age</strong>. Populations with low <strong>mortality</strong> rates have<br />
higher rates above that <strong>age</strong>.<br />
• In polynomial regression <strong>the</strong> <strong>age</strong>² term is always positive, with<br />
one exception for men <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe.<br />
• In countries with a high <strong>mortality</strong> rate <strong>the</strong> Gompertz equations<br />
are characterized by a high <strong>in</strong>tercept and a low slope. In a given<br />
country <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercept is always higher and <strong>the</strong> slope lower <strong>in</strong> men<br />
compared to women.<br />
• Strong evidence po<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a maximum lifespan<br />
for <strong>the</strong> human population (rectangularisation <strong>of</strong> human <strong>mortality</strong>).<br />
HK2004
Causes for <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>mortality</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>age</strong> <strong>class</strong> <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> years.<br />
1. The decl<strong>in</strong>e is strongly related to <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>age</strong> <strong>class</strong><br />
35-74 y.<br />
2. The causes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>age</strong> <strong>class</strong> <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> y are thus essentially similar<br />
to <strong>the</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole population.<br />
3. The population <strong>age</strong>d <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> y is a healthy selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al population.<br />
4. The older <strong>age</strong> <strong>class</strong>es are more conservative and less <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
to change <strong>the</strong>ir lifestyle.<br />
5. The <strong>age</strong> <strong>class</strong> <strong>75</strong>-<strong>84</strong> y has rarely been <strong>the</strong> object <strong>of</strong> special<br />
medical attention.<br />
6. Differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>mortality</strong> between <strong>the</strong> social <strong>class</strong>es decrease<br />
at higher <strong>age</strong>s.<br />
HK2004
7. Many factors <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>mortality</strong> rates at <strong>the</strong> population level:<br />
-genetics<br />
- medical care<br />
- smok<strong>in</strong>g<br />
- nutrition<br />
- pollution<br />
-stress<br />
- obesity<br />
- physical activity<br />
- social <strong>class</strong> a.o.<br />
8. A healthier nutrition (less salt, less saturated fat, more fruit and<br />
vegetables ...) is <strong>the</strong> most plausible explanation for <strong>the</strong><br />
decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>mortality</strong> rates at older <strong>age</strong>s.<br />
HK2004
Ethische en socio-economische<br />
aspecten van de<br />
gezondheidszorg bij ouderen<br />
H. Kesteloot<br />
Dept. Epidemiologie, K.U.Leuven<br />
HK2004
De socio-economische realiteit:<br />
In de wereld (6.2 * 10 9 personen) zijn ongeveer<br />
800 * 10 6 personen ondervoed en<br />
sterven 24.000 p/d door honger.<br />
Een miljard mensen hebben een <strong>in</strong>komen van<br />
m<strong>in</strong>der dan 1.5 Euro per dag.<br />
HK2004
Kernprobleem<br />
Er is geld te kort.<br />
Dit verplicht te kiezen.<br />
Kiezen is verliezen.<br />
HK2004
Verantwoord<strong>in</strong>g voor de beperk<strong>in</strong>g van<br />
uitgaven voor gezondheidszorg<br />
bejaarden.<br />
Deze uitgaven zijn zeer belangrijk<br />
2-3 10 9 € per jaar,<br />
En bijzonder we<strong>in</strong>ig efficient<br />
HK2004
Solidariteit<br />
- Wat is belangrijker: solidariteit van de<br />
jongeren met de ouderen (pensioenen) <strong>of</strong><br />
solidariteit van de ouderen (groter vermogen)<br />
met de jongeren?<br />
- Houdt de solidariteit op aan de landsgrenzen?<br />
HK2004
De uitgaven voor de gezondheidszorg bij ouderen<br />
zi<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>efficient. Ze kunnen de<br />
levensverwacht<strong>in</strong>g nauwelijks beïnvloeden.<br />
Er bestaat bij de mens een genetisch bepaalde<br />
maximumleeftijd berekend op ± 107 j. Hoe<br />
hoger de levensduur, hoe sneller de toename<br />
van de mortaliteit met de leeftijd boven de 80 j.<br />
(rectangularisatie van de mortaliteitscurve –<br />
compressie van de mortaliteit)<br />
HK2004
Ethische problematiek:<br />
Kunnen <strong>in</strong>efficiënte uitgaven voor<br />
gezondheidszorg verantwoord worden gezien<br />
de grote noden op andere, sociaal relevante,<br />
dome<strong>in</strong>en?<br />
Dit geldt <strong>in</strong> het bijzonder voor door de Sociale<br />
Zekerheid vergoede uitgaven.<br />
HK2004
Competitieve doelen voor economisch en sociaal<br />
verantwoorde uitgaven<br />
- Geneeskundige kosten voor bejaarden (>85 j), <strong>in</strong>clusief<br />
dementen<br />
- Uitgaven voor onderwijs (permanente vorm<strong>in</strong>g)<br />
- Uitgaven voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek<br />
- Uitgaven voor technologisch <strong>in</strong>novatieve <strong>in</strong>dustriën<br />
- Uitgaven voor k<strong>in</strong>deropvang<br />
- Uitgaven voor k<strong>in</strong>derbijslag (stimuleren van geboorten)<br />
- Uitgaven voor sociale won<strong>in</strong>gbouw<br />
- Uitgaven voor kultuur<br />
- Uitgaven voor <strong>in</strong>burger<strong>in</strong>g van migranten<br />
- Uitgaven voor ontwikkel<strong>in</strong>gshulp e.a.<br />
Criterium: kosten/baten analyse<br />
HK2004
Aanvullen van Zilverfonds.<br />
Belast<strong>in</strong>g op vermogen na overlijden:<br />
< 70 j 0 %<br />
70-74 j 2 %<br />
<strong>75</strong>-79 j 4 %<br />
80-<strong>84</strong> j 6 %<br />
≥85 j 8 %<br />
Verantwoord<strong>in</strong>g: verschil <strong>in</strong> pensioenontvangsten bij<br />
gelijke arbeidsduur<br />
0 j 20 j arbeidsduur 60 j<br />
70 j<br />
85 j<br />
HK2004<br />
∆ 15 j = ± 225.000 €
HK2004